Shashank Nayak
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2017
- Messages
- 5,153
- Likes
- 17,261
India is dependent on Tibetan waters to a much lesser degree than either China or Pakistan..
Tibet's Independence is India's security.
India is dependent on Tibetan waters to a much lesser degree than either China or Pakistan..
Tibet's Independence is India's security.
True.Mostly rain water in NE keeps the brahmputra going for us.India is dependent on Tibetan waters to a much lesser degree than either China or Pakistan..
Irrigation and food security vise .. Sutlej which passes through Punjab and has origin in Tibet matters.. other ones .. not so much...True.Mostly rain water in NE keeps the brahmputra going for us.
Suppose India Captures entire Tibet and then Tibet is independent. Can Tibet stop the Water flowing down into Chinese Rivers ?
Tibet's Independence is India's security.
Capturing Tibet?Suppose India Captures entire Tibet and then Tibet is independent. Can Tibet stop the Water flowing down into Chinese Rivers ?
The answer is No.
Those waters can not even be diverted but Brahmputra Water in Tibet can be diverted to China.
Then what is the "Hullah" about?
Total Tibetan population is about 65 lakhs / 6.5 million.Capturing Tibet?
Not possible.
Enabling Tibet to get freedom - a distant possibility.
just drawing parallel here vis a vis kashmir & Pakistan.
such a decision of PLA translates to - From the frying pan into the fire. I'm sure the Chinese dimwits are glancing at this forum activities. I can confirm they just had a heart attack.How are we placed w.r.t defending a joint PLA+Nepal Army+Maoist thrust into Bihar?
With air advantage, which we have, everything becomes possible.such a decision translates to - From the frying pan into the fire.
Bihar is a very densely populated Indian state with no separatist or "dogla" collaborator tendency. (Barring the obvious Maoists and other such groups)Total Tibetan population is about 65 lakhs / 6.5 million.
Assuming 3-5% or maybe 10% enlist.
Can they defend Tibet against PLA?
Eastern Tibet, where most of the population resides happens to be closer to China.
Western Tibet OTOH has very little to fight unless it is of super strategic importance to you.
Ch4 is junk.How effective are drones like CH-4 or non stealth predator drones for close air support.. in ladakh.. , assuming a contested airspace...?
LMAO...arey nahi ho, was just laying out diversionary tactics for elimination.Bihar is a very densely populated Indian state with no separatist or "dogla" collaborator tendency. (Barring the obvious Maoists and other such groups)
My 70 year old father would happily die for the chance of killing some gooks.
And that's saying something (he's the laziest human on earth).
Heads will roll. Literally.
Aan deyo.
क्या भाई @aditya10r और @Bhumihar , अपना जिहाद का सपना सच होगा क्या?
Pla can't invade Taiwan . Don't make me laugh too hard I've just eaten a lot. LolTotal Tibetan population is about 65 lakhs / 6.5 million.
Assuming 3-5% or maybe 10% enlist.
Can they defend Tibet against PLA?
Eastern Tibet, where most of the population resides happens to be closer to China.
Western Tibet OTOH has very little to fight unless it is of super strategic importance to you.
Ranbir sena ko call lagana agar koi Kommunist dikhe toh.(Barring the obvious Maoists and other such groups)
Absolutely.But india was never a player in HK, india's opinion on HK doesn't matter.
Decimating China and re establishment of tibet as independent buffer is our cause 100%%. We also have to take bake acxai chin and kailash parvat .Absolutely.
When we demanded the rightful ownership of Kashmir from the UNSC, Nobody gave us a damn, said we were violating human rights. China vetoed every time. But when it comes to HK, everybody bats an eye! These G7 doesn't give a damn about us, now they demand support form us? Double standards! We didn't loose our men time and time again to protect what it ours, and surely we don't want our men to fight for something which isn't our god damn cause on the first place.