You first said our troops captured were paraded in front of officers in humiliating fashion.... If that so why the denied capturing any Indian soldiers. Doesn't sound humiliating to me.
Please read that post of mine very clearly. It was reportedly done. Personally, does not matter. We are equally good at giving back.
Initially you also claimed casualties on Chinese side is less then us including death and injured.... But now you are counting 30+.... Please explain.
There were two phases. One, when Col Santosh was lost. We suffered in that.
The second, when the reinforcements from the unit came to avenge. It was not immediate, but it was within a short span.
Figure of 43 killed are based on esitimated heli lifts.
The same is also carried out for critically injured.
My figures, like the time line of crows of our western neighbour who regularly disappear, are based on what can be corroborated and somewhat ascertained.
China will also never reveal it's true casualties. But debrief was insightful.
And when I say our casualties were higher, I stand by it.
A battle casualty is defined as any death/injury (major or minor) sustained in face of enemy irrespective of whether from enemy action or natural (including a rock falling and killing our soldier). Our troops attacked uphill, suffered. But they achieved their aims.