Bhadra
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2011
- Messages
- 11,991
- Likes
- 23,756
Oh My.. corrected.. Thanks..Harish Khare Not Harish Salve..Big difference
Though Harish Salve might also say the same thing..
Oh My.. corrected.. Thanks..Harish Khare Not Harish Salve..Big difference
I doubt Harish Salve has issues with ITBPOh My.. corrected.. Thanks..
Though Harish Salve might also say the same thing..
Thinking of changing the Defence Minister is a panic reaction. We need to keep a few points in mind.The points you made are definitely worth considering. But what will Amit Shah brings to the table? Bureaucracy is deep rooted in Indian defence politics. He certainly though will not become anybody's puppet but his skill set is limited too. Parrikar was best in the business I guess & it is a pity we lost him. He had great analytical skills. Rajnath looks more like a stop gap & the one that PM trusts.
Yes a supporter in Harish Khare who even MMS found to be incompetent & hence fired him. The view is published in The Wire...Is that true what Harish Khare has written and suggested in the wire. I have gained the notoriety in time and again suggesting synergy between all agencies that deal with an external threat - MoD, MEA, MHA etc.
The present circumstance demand that all the lethargic forces connected with LAC be kicked very hard and brought in line to ward off this menace rather than IPS. MEA and MoD running their own empire without unison.
Well, guys, I found a supporter....
The issue is with National Security management architecture and all agencies working on that ... all have issues..I doubt Harish Salve has issues with ITBP
its just provocation strategy, if we did something, we will be targeted as aggressor. Its CCP pulling strings.I seriously feel we should widen Siliguri corridor through Nepal. Time has come now enough of this Commie bulls**t.
So to summariseThe issue is with National Security management architecture and all agencies working on that ... all have issues..
The issue with Army is that it does has not have force matrix to conduct a two front war// The issue with IAF is that it has no aircraft.... The issue with RAW and IB is that they are unable to gather intelligence, the issue with CAPF is that they all want to be commandos in uniform but police in deeds.. They want pay and perks better than Army but are happy guarding bungalows, bridges and stores... the problem with IPS is that they think they can never work under anyone..
There are problems galore and not work, no results..
One boss may bring them together... so far all PMs have failed to do so.
I agree with all your points especially the first one that was bang on (some action needed there). I don't know what is the reason we are so reluctant to take on the Chinese bully regardless of who is in power. In Doklam we took a stand & gave a massive hit to China geopolitically. For all we know China may be plotting a revenge after that & after revocation Article 370 they had to do something. DSDBO is a direct threat to Karakoram Highway besides India is already eyeing GB. I think this is all power posturing & they are trying to keep India in defensive position. The current government has made lot of noise regarding these issues Let's see whether they walk the talk. Because if we give in now then mission PoK will just be a fantasy & rhetoric like all these years.Thinking of changing the Defence Minister is a panic reaction. We need to keep a few points in mind.
1.The main and culpable failure was in intelligence. Military Intelligence, R & AW and possibly IB all failed to anticipate the Chinese taking advantage of an so called military exercise to execute their nefarious plans. They swiftly shifted the forces stationed for the military exercise to the border points of ingression. We did not detect it. Human intelligence/assets in the PLA proved ineffective.
2.The Indo - China border is not manned metre by metre by either the PLA or the Indian Army/CAPF. Unlike the Indo - Pakistan border. So it is very easy at most lengths of the border to make an unexpected assault at platoon or even company level and occupy land belonging to the other side.
In normal conditions the other side has the option of countering the manoeuvre by occupying the opponents land at a place of his choosing. It can be accomplished in a short time frame. The message is - if you can do it, I can also.
But in this instance it seems our Army was not given the permission to do a tit - for - tat. The Army can only be faulted for intelligence failure. What the Chinese did was not any grand success. How difficult is it to occupy a small piece of land by subterfuge. If it were Pakistan our Army would have grabbed twice or even thrice the amount of land on the other side.
We are dealing with the Chinese with velvet gloves. The Government probably has its reasons. No Government( be it the past Congress ones also) has adopted an aggressive posture towards China. If we had a Congress Government today their reaction would not have been very different. Perhaps we are waiting for the right time to take on China as an equal. Right now let's hope tension reduces and the Chinese retreat.
Certainly... IAF has 31 squadrons against 45 sanctioned ... that too for one front scenario ... that certainly is an issue.. Army has almost same structure post 1971 but threat scenarios have completely changed.. that is a major issue..So to summarise
Army / Air force,: tragic heroes with "no aircraft" (20+ squad of sukhoi, mig, mirage) and no "force matrix" (1.1 million troops, 4000 tanks etc)
Non army: "PMs failed...RAW and IB unable to gather intelligence.....CAPF happy guarding bungalows, bridges and stores... IPS can never work under anyone.."
Yup and everyone here would have called the congress traitors etc....We are dealing with the Chinese with velvet gloves. The Government probably has its reasons. No Government( be it the past Congress ones also) has adopted an aggressive posture towards China. If we had a Congress Government today their reaction would not have been very different.
The problem with that is it’s never going to be the right time and why would the Chinese allow you that time? Let’s hope? Why would the Chinese retreat without achieving their aims. Seems like they hold all the cards. You have to have some leverage over an adversary, can’t pin your hope on the adversaries goodwill.Perhaps we are waiting for the right time to take on China as an equal. Right now let's hope tension reduces and the Chinese retreat.
I think to keep military intelligence out of it as they have neither the mandate nor resources for external intelligence.Thinking of changing the Defence Minister is a panic reaction. We need to keep a few points in mind.
1.The main and culpable failure was in intelligence. Military Intelligence, R & AW and possibly IB all failed to anticipate the Chinese taking advantage of an so called military exercise to execute their nefarious plans. They swiftly shifted the forces stationed for the military exercise to the border points of ingression. We did not detect it. Human intelligence/assets in the PLA proved ineffective.
2.The Indo - China border is not manned metre by metre by either the PLA or the Indian Army/CAPF. Unlike the Indo - Pakistan border. So it is very easy at most lengths of the border to make an unexpected assault at platoon or even company level and occupy land belonging to the other side.
In normal conditions the other side has the option of countering the manoeuvre by occupying the opponents land at a place of his choosing. It can be accomplished in a short time frame. The message is - if you can do it, I can also.
But in this instance it seems our Army was not given the permission to do a tit - for - tat. The Army can only be faulted for intelligence failure. What the Chinese did was not any grand success. How difficult is it to occupy a small piece of land by subterfuge. If it were Pakistan our Army would have grabbed twice or even thrice the amount of land on the other side.
Preparations to meet the Chinese threat is under action and visible only in terms of building infrastructure that too due to the personal interest taken by the PM.We are dealing with the Chinese with velvet gloves. The Government probably has its reasons. No Government( be it the past Congress ones also) has adopted an aggressive posture towards China. If we had a Congress Government today their reaction would not have been very different. Perhaps we are waiting for the right time to take on China as an equal. Right now let's hope tension reduces and the Chinese retreat.
Mission PoK? This government couldn’t even buy a 1000 pieces of artillery in 6 years, even when it was available locally. Would have made a lot of difference in the present situation. Tough talk on Pakistan comes easy, we need to have the muscle to deal with things of this nature. A border skirmish should have always been factored in, both with Pakistan and with China and possibly both at the same time.. Where are your big guns if you want to fortify both sides. Even if the Chinese go back, the world will know we didn’t exactly put up. No matter what spin we put on it.The current government has made lot of noise regarding these issues Let's see whether they walk the talk. Because if we give in now then mission PoK will just be a fantasy & rhetoric like all these years.
Sir, poor armed forces of a poor nation sir. They need to figure out best response in the limitations that all of us are under.Certainly... IAF has 31 squadrons against 45 sanctioned ... that too for one front scenario ... that certainly is an issue.. Army has almost same structure post 1971 but threat scenarios have completely changed.. that is a major issue..
CAPF has more than 5oo battalions but not trained for wars... how can that not be an issue..
Why would intelligence failure not occur when entire intelligence setup In the country is used for political intelligence..
And for good reason, since they would have silently backed down giving free territory to Chinese without a peep out of anyone like they had done many times in past,Yup and everyone here would have called the congress traitors etc....
But it still made Chinese virus party tuck its tail between its leg and run off in dokhlam I mean what's their hundreds of tanks, stealth aircraft numerical superiority for?This government couldn’t even buy a 1000 pieces of artillery in 6 years