Missing the Woods for The Trees
The poser or question is - in the context of our National Perspective or in comprehending a long term Vision of a Grand strategy of India China border Issue are we in the forum and in India, in general, missing the Woods for the trees?
Defining the Problem in Narrow Context. The narrow context here implies " "border issue".
*
China has secured its perceived land frontier with India in 1962. In China captured Aksai Chin and is still holding it. They captured Arunachal also but withdrew to a line far from McMahon line. From the Chinese perspective, they have settled their border de facto.
*
Then what is the Problem? Problem now is to convert this de facto line into IB. Force India to accept it as a settled border. Burry 1962 in history and bring stability to Chinese frontiers and Chinese control of Tibet at a low cost.
*
Past Trends. After 1962 War China had made its intention clear and asked India to recognize the Chinese control as the border. Even before War China gave two control/claim lines for India to accept. After some years, China also came up with the concept of a Package deal. That is China will recognize McMahon Line and India should accept the Chinese occupation of Aksaichin. However, that was not accepted by Nehru / India.
*
Concept of LAC. China came up with a concept of LAC and Rajiv Gandhi signed an agreement with China called BPTA in 1993 in which the term and concept of LCA was. Looking deeply into the issue, that was old wine in a new bottle - Make India to accept a line even if it is not a boundary. Once defined
Lines exist for a period that would eventually be accepted as a border. India willy nicely fell for it. The entire mechanism of BPTA is fraudulent that has forced the MEA and Army leaders to speak about LAC and LAC and nothing about the real issue - the border. So Chinese have actually got the Indians bogged down at LAC.
What is India's Perspective?, Indian stand since very beginning was that Aksaichin is Indian territory and the Shimla agreement on Eastern boundry is valid treaty subject to watershed being the border. On the question of LAC India has its own perspective without prejudice to boundry question.
Can Anyone in India Accept Chinese Position? No one can possibly do that- not even Narendra Modi.
What Could be Indian Grand Strategy - Not to accept the Chinese occupation of Aksaichin as part of China, consolidate hold over Arunachal Pradesh as Indian territory? Keep the issue of boundry open to be settled in the future to India's advantage. Accept the concept of LAC to bring in peace and calm over India China boundry issue.
Then What is Current Strategic Issues between India and China ?
* Abolition of the special status of J&K reduces Chinese pronsity to interfare on the status of J&K.
* This further narrows down Chinese dispute to Union Territory of Ladakh.
* Indian military buildup in Ladakh and fast rate infrastructure development has increased Indian capacity and capability to launch a military operation in Aksaichin and threaten Xinjiang - Tibet road.
* Indian infrastructure buildup in DBO threatens status of Shakshagam Velly and Khunjraib Pass through which CPEC road passes.
* India has started making noises about GB thereby threatening Chinese interest directly.
India instead of burying the Ghost of 1962 is keen to reinvigorate and resurrect it thereby further making settlement of Chinese border problematic and costly.
India having developed infrastructure in border areas and having consolidated its hold can pose a greater military threat with efficiency and at a lesser cost.
Forget about Finger 4 or Finger8 and leave that to the Brigade Commander. Chinese want you to get bogged down in Fingers. Think of how to take back Aksaichin. Do not miss woods for the trees.