flanker99
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2019
- Messages
- 2,499
- Likes
- 14,165
wang(wank) yi?....bastards been promotedWhere is the last CCP clown? Gulag'd?I swear they all look alike.
wang(wank) yi?....bastards been promotedWhere is the last CCP clown? Gulag'd?I swear they all look alike.
?
Ah you deleted your post.
AA guns are you fucking kidding me what is this stone ageI am afraid this strategy has been already stolen by the armed forces. We massively improved our air defense cover after the 2019 Balakot strike. Most crucial areas now have a 3-layer AD consisting of AA guns + short-range SAMs + Medium range SAMs.
Also, regarding your vetoing of long-range bombers, we have no need of long-range bombers. We are not looking to invade mainland China, just to protect ourselves from Chinese aggression. Hence, we have no requirement for long-range strikes with massive payload capacity.
It will be wiser if we focus on offensive-defense strategy w.r.t China in Tibet & Indian Ocean.
Nagamese sound very much like Assamese.Ah you deleted your post.
I meant the language being spoken in the SFF video doesn't sound like Tibetan.
I would put my money on Nagamese. It is spoken in Nagaland and has a heavy Assamese base.
The lads in the video could be Nagas or from another area in the NE, not Tibetans.
That's why I said it sounds like Nagamese and not Tibetan.Nagamese sound very much like Assamese.
Lots of Assamese words in the language.
Listen carefully, if you can understand Assamese.
Wrong. We need to go hard after logistic nodes of the PLA and they may be buried deep into Chinese territory.Also, regarding your vetoing of long-range bombers, we have no need of long-range bombers. We are not looking to invade mainland China, just to protect ourselves from Chinese aggression. Hence, we have no requirement for long-range strikes with massive payload capacity.
It will be wiser if we focus on offensive-defense strategy w.r.t China in Tibet & Indian Ocean.
Lol. AA guns are widespread, just called by different names to sound tacticool. One of the best and most cost effective ways of tackling threats that sneak past missile defence.AA guns are you fucking kidding me what is this stone age
The "nodes" that can be advantageous to hit will be factories on the east coast, not feasible to hit without very, very long range missiles (3000 km types). Plus you gotta hope those missiles dont get intercepted in the 5 hours it takes them to get that far.Wrong. We need to go hard after logistic nodes of the PLA and they may be buried deep into Chinese territory.
I really have no patience to babysit gen-Z kids getting into defense. New-gen of DFI please step in kindly.AA guns are you fucking kidding me what is this stone age
Nah I am new man, I have no shame in admitting that you guys probably know way more than what I know. you mean ack ack or like phalynxI really have no patience to babysit gen-Z kids getting into defense. New-gen of DFI please step in kindly.
Ususally, its either very high rate of fire (3000+rounds a minute) of 20mm/30mm, or lower rate (~200-500 per minute) of 40mm programmable ammo. Both have merits and demerits, depends on what you are using for.Nah I am new man, I have no shame in admitting that you guys probably know way more than what I know. you mean ack ack or like phalynx
Clash points resolved with the creation of a buffer zone -Folks I am just asking about the status of that is the clash zones and status whether resolved or to be resolved
Not that what we lost or what we gained
Just where the situation is and what has been resolved and update on buffer zones
The reason I am asking is that I have forgotten the entire thing for atleast 6 months and not getting any source for recalling and condition of buffer zones
If u guys don't want to say it in this thread p.s do me a favor by speaking to me in DM sec
If u want then give me the link of previous posts even that would suffice
@mokoman @mist_consecutive @Jimih @vidhwanshak
He means radar guided defense gunsNah I am new man you mean ack ack or like phalynx
Last doubt what's the status of pp-16Clash points resolved with the creation of a buffer zone -
- North Pangong Tso
- PP15 (Hot Springs)
- PP17A
- Galwan
Clash points resolved without the creation of a buffer zone -
- South Pangong Tso
Clash points still active -
- Depsang
- Demchok (civilian intrusion)
What is the status ?
Everything is calm and peaceful at the border. Both sides are building infrastructure (road, barracks, heliports, bunkers, etc.) at a rapid pace instead of de-escalation. The situation can go south any day if China wants, so Indian Army is maintaining a high level of readiness.
Remind me, which one was PP16 ?Last doubt what's the status of pp-16
Have we withdrawn from there or just temporary adjustments
AhhRemind me, which one was PP16 ?
Wasn't that PP15 ? Whatever, yeah the situation still holds same as what you have written.Ahh
During gogra hotspring disengagement bro
Both sides went back
We left pp-16 during that time to near pp-15 basically we went 37km back compared to 5km by chinese
I hope u remember know
I don't remember exactlyWasn't that PP15 ? Whatever, yeah the situation still holds same as what you have written.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
India shifts 50,000 troops to China border | Indian Army | 2 | ||
India-China 2020 Border conflict | Indian Army | 29497 | ||
India-China 2020 Border Dispute - Military and Strategic Discussion | Indian Army | 19501 | ||
India China LAC & International Border Discussions | Indian Army | 26757 |