i know that GE and Pratt & Whitney are in development to increase the life to 6000+. they might be near. but still they are not going to give it to india to further use and export so continuing kaveri and other engine is only option .
here is another source and this is well known writer
https://bharatkarnad.com/2016/04/23/how-choices-get-made-develop-indigenous-vs-lisc-produce/
"
Another such but slightly different, decision may soon be on MOD’s table. It involves the jet power plant for Tejas. The original General Electric F-404 capable of 80-85 KiloNewtons of thrust equipping Tejas is to be replaced by the GE 414-INS6 engine capable of 98KN or 22,000 lbs of thrust, turbofan, with afterburner. This was an indent for the navalised version. IAF, always the laggard fetched up later to demand the same engine. In 2010, India contracted to buy 99 of the 414s for the Tejas Mk-2 program, with the delivery begun in 2013. With the total requirement of 500-600 engines for the Tejas (with each 414 engine estimated to pull 3,000 hours of flying, and 3.5 engines for the lifetime of each aircraft), HAL is seeking to license produce them in Banglaore, in its well-honed SKD-CKD assembly mode that guarantees HAL continues to learn nothing about ingesting and innovating technology, and even less about designing and making aircraft engines."
and why i am so much sure about it because i have read the latest development in Snecma M88 to increase it life to 4000 hr. and i know that GE and Pratt & Whitney are in development to increase the life to 6000+. they might be near. but still they are not going to give it to india to further use and export so continuing kaveri and other engine is only option .
2032 is time as same as 2022 for lca. the problem we overcome in lca will provide a lot help for amca just let proper funding to be given for prototype. current news show that drdo(ada) and hal has learn a lot from lca project...
If GE does have an extended life engine, why wouldn't they sell it to India??? It sounds a little ridiculous that they would have invested all the money to upgrade the components but will limit their sales only to F18's. The extended life just gets 'priced' in - it's not really a 'nuclear' technology that they need to prevent falling in wrong hands!!!
Bharat Karnad is also blowing a lot of hot air there!!
su-30MKI's airframes have a lifetime of 6,000 hrs
F16's airframes have a lifetime of 8,000 hrs
Rafale's airframes have a lifetime of 8,000 hrs
F18's airframes have a lifetime of 6,000 hrs (recently extended a little)
According to BK, Tejas airframe has a lifetime of 3.5*3000 =
10,500 hours!!!!
REALLY???
(I've heard of Tejas airframe lifetime to be 6000 hours, which sounds more plausible! As the IAF would have required the designers to meet the lifetimes of other successful aircraft. It would be ridiculous to think that IAF would have asked ADA to exceed the global standards by more than 50% in their very first attempt at a fighter jet).
Also, according to Bharat Karnad (in the same article that you referenced) Tejas Mk2 will be fitted with 414-EPE engine delivering 120KN??
REALLY??
He claims that deliveries of those engines had already begun in 2013 (EPE engine already existed then?? it doesn't exist even now!!!!)
Sorry to say, but you're quoting fake news!!!