- Joined
- Jan 14, 2020
- Messages
- 9,609
- Likes
- 84,139
what is nam2.0If there is a chance of WW3 , we will create NAM 2.0 , with some useless small beggar nations and sit in side lines, its basically our destiny .
While china and US nuke each other , MEA will be giving out press release with phrase "peace and tranquality" in them .
But our anti western psyche with nehruvian diplomacy won't let it happen. We also suffer from paralysis of analysis.we also need to join gang bang if NATO is going after china
Bloodly war Bloody warsir, i still believe that china is not going to home empty hand and border tension will escalate which will lead to a bloody war.. the pull back is because they have realized that their position is prone to flooding and the valley is a easy targets for jags.
would you bet differently for a bottle of this?
View attachment 52350
a lot of territory is ambigious trade and strategic Siachen, Gwadar etc...the said territory should have strategic value for trade, only then it becomes a worthy investment for a military conflict.
i don't drink anymore, but i'll take the bet. since it can't be open ended, let's have the upper limit as end of calendar year.sir, i still believe that china is not going to home empty hand and border tension will escalate which will lead to a bloody war.. the pull back is because they have realized that their position is prone to flooding and the valley is a easy targets for jags.
would you bet differently for a bottle of this?
View attachment 52350
what is nam2.0
CPEC.the said territory should have strategic value for trade, only then it becomes a worthy investment for a military conflict.
Was 1962 abt trade .. I think china wanted to teach india a lesson on who is the boss whn india started started showing leadership role in world ... And they wanted to secure tibet..in case you are talking about clash between India & china.
i am sticking to my fundamental assessment, wars are mostly about trade and it's implications. India and china are not competitors in trade.
if you are talking about clash between china & somebody else.
sure, there is a possibility.
Guess... ???Bunch of countries staying neutral in Cold war era , not siding with either US or Soviet Union .Non-Aligned Movement - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
One of its founders was Nehru . So you can guess its a failure .
One would expect that after such humiliation, any half-decent human being would stop the verbal diarrhea, but Ajai Shukla seems to be made of the same material that Rahul Gandhi is. Not only did he not stop, but continued to spin out more lies, each more grotesque than the other. This was especially fascinating as by this time the attempts to frame a narrative had completely failed and it was clear, that it was China, which was trapped, and not India.
I am talking USA-China. Some military clash is likely either in SCS or some other place. It will not be a full-fledged war yet.in case you are talking about clash between India & china.
i am sticking to my fundamental assessment, wars are mostly about trade and it's implications. India and china are not competitors in trade.
if you are talking about clash between china & somebody else.
sure, there is a possibility.
How it will not be feasible? To me it can be a short cut, of course considering the fact that CPEC is fully operational. They are also I heard trying to connect a Thai port for another opening. The article seems to be correct that Arctic route will also come handy in future.gwadar and CPEC both are failed projects just look at the route that China has to follow ultimately it will not be feasible.
I meant that .Guess... ???
It was a failure...