Ar.gaurav28
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2021
- Messages
- 197
- Likes
- 669
yes I understood that but what I’m trying to make you aware about is with more platform being inducted there will also be a increase in upkeep which will also have a strain on overall defence budget!Flying cost is part of opex not capex. My entire post is about capex not opex . So you have misunderstood entire post.
DB= A+B with increase in A there will be an increase in B!
As there is that old proverb
“Hathi kareedna aasan hai but palna mushkil...”
please tell me how much the predator & heron drones costed India??Most of capex burden remain fighter jets , awacs tankers , drones are much cheaper in comparison.
Well I hope that what you are wishing comes true!This year armed forces capex grew 18 %.
If you just take 10 % capex growth per year for iaf than it will double in just 6 year from 6 billion ( effective with extra budgetary spend) to 12 billion usd and then will grow further from there on.
This thing I agree Indian made will be cheap and actually matter in war situation where i can produce as many & as fast as we need not dependent on any other country.As more and more things indigenously built and bought they will be much cheaper and we will be able to buy more for less. For example Astra mk1 costs half as much as comparable foreign missile. So you could buy double the number with same amount of money.
well that leads back to the main discussion...either there will be 110 mmrca fighter or mk2 and as I said early...
Thus,safe approach will still be 38 squadrons with mmrca or 42 squadrons with mk2 !!
less money, no hype, every sect content & we have the deterrence the bigger reason we won’t invest too much, as we always are defensive not offensive!