militarysta
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 2,110
- Likes
- 789
ROTFL.What are you compared with?
TYPE -96A at moving position + 1600-1800m distance
VS
Leopard-2 at fixed position + 1000m distance
You are so smart.
No, you don't understand at all:
Type-96A from tank biathlon on 1600-1800m from FIXED POSITION:
from this video:
Танковый биатлон 2014 - 4 ВыпуÑк 13.09.2014 (HD) - YouTube
since 50:01
first tank had broken FCS so Chineese team put next one Type-96A
and result was like on photo above:
1st -in target
2th - miss the target
3th - in target
----
4th - adittional - in target
on 1600-1800m distance
and for compare MOVING at least 20km/h on 1600-1800m distance Leopard-2A4:
translate:W dniu 01.12.05r.na SBCz 2 kcz została poddana strzelaniu szkolnemu nr 2N tj. strzelanie w ruchu, o charakterze sprawdzającym z czołgu L2A4 osiągając następujące wyniki
1. Strzelanie szkolne nr 2N , strzelaÅ‚o 14 załóg, 12 bardzo dobrych, 2 – dobre. Ocena Å›rednia 4,86 (5)
Skuteczność trafień pierwszym pociskiem 120mm - 100% tj. 14/14
In 1 december of the 2005 on (trening field name) second tank company was examinated from "trening fire no 2N" -so trening during moving, to checkt tank Leopard-2A4 sucht results was achive:
effectivnes to hit target by first round 120mm - 100% 14/14
And for sure offcial MOD reqiurments for sucht trening practise:
=========================================
So:
1) distans was the same 1600-1800m
2) one Type-96 was shooting 4 times from FIXED position and miss ones
3) 14 polish Leopard-2A4 was shooting during moving at least 20km/h and hit in 100% cases (14/14)
We can compare another one think:
Type-96A 1600-1800m ammo disprension on field target and Leo-2 L-44 on the same distance.