Yeah, but some study for it. Which you clearly haven't done.
Awwww. Westoid barbarian not happy when educated people dont agree with him. Boo hoo.
With this sort of knowledge, you wouldn't be asked to teach history to turtles, let alone humans.
Which is still more historically educated than you, kiddo.
We have had experience with multiethnic countries for centuries. Seeing how we largely abandoned it, you might take a look at what went wrong.
WRONG. You have experience with multi-ethnic EMPIRES where one ethnicity was singularly dominant. THAT is why it didn't work out for primitive barbarians like your kind. In Asia, multi-ethnic countries do not have one single dominant ethnicity in political and social life. hence it works for us.
If anything, Serbs are really Orthodox Croats. They took their language and much of their culture from us.
Ah so you DO admit that Serbs and Croats are the same, finally. Only to you they are orthodox croats,while to the rest of the world, you are catholic serbs. See, progress.
Barbarians are barbarians precisely because they are incapable of complex undertakings, and war is the most complex undertaking there is.
LMAO. No. Building a city is far more complex than running around destroying shit. This is why mongols and vikings destroyed far more advanced societies in their path and couldn't build worth shit.
Higher degree of civilisation has yielded higher competence in warfare back since Neolithic.
Seriously, were you thrown out of kindergarten? Because this degree of BS is something I don't remember even in the primary school.
False. If that was true, Romans wouldn't have been thumped by Huns, Chinese by mongols, Indians by turks, Franks by the vikings etc. Clearly, croat education leaves much to be desired.
In your vodka-fuelled la-la world, maybe.
I don't drink vodka.
Look, literally everything you have written so far is either a lie or a bullshit. Europe has not failed at forming multiethnic societies, and we are not Serbs.
Yes, they have. Which is why Europe has ZERO countries like India, China, Myanmar,Iran, Thailand, Indonesia, Phillipines- which are INDEGENOUSLY MULTIETHNIC NATIONS. You primitive barbarians suck at forming mutli-ethnic nations, since you invented racism and love trying to divide up ethnicities over BS nonsense identities, like Scots and English, Serbs and Croats, Austrians and Germans, etc.
Civilization has not developed thanks to multiethnic societies. Rather, multiethnic societies develop thanks to the civilization, which allows the biggest group on the block to conquer their neighbours.
In short, multiethnic societies happen due to barbarity of civilization.
But of course you have no clue what you are talking about.
Absolute hogwash. Civilisation IS created due to mutli-ethnic societies, since Bronze age created civilisation and Brozne age required multi-ethnic societies, as tin and copper deposits in old world occur very far apart, requiring multi-ethnic polities, long distance trade and system of credit ( to fund these long distance trade, which back in the day took YEARS). There's literally oodles and oodles of books on this in academia and its standard accepted historical theory on formation of civilisation. But i don't expect a history illiterate barbarian serb with an identity crisis to know this.
Also, multi-ethnic societies like Iran, India, China have been responsible for FAR LESS warfare, civic genocide and human oppression than mono-ethnic Euro barbarians like Angles, Saxons, Germans, French,Spaniards, etc.
Ah yes, vaunted European primitivity...
With the exception of Israel, China, Japan and South Korea, all top-level patent countries are either in Western Europe, or former European colonies. And those exceptions actively copied everything from Europe they could.
You are a clueless little child, aren't you?
1. What part of SOCIALLY PRIMITIVE did you conflate with technologically primitive, ignorant barbarian ?
2. Europe copied everything from Asia - including calculus, scientific theory, how to count, capitalism, corporatism and as recently as 250 years ago, India alone was as rich as entire Europe combined, with China being almost as rich as India itself. What goes around, comes around, barbarian.
Oh, I am not accusing you of lying. But you are repeating someone else's lies like a brainless little puppet you are.
Says the brainless euro-barbarian primitive from a barbarian nation who's recorded history is shorter than my own family history.
World wars are wars like any other war. And it happened with colonization. If you think world wars wouldn't have happened had India and China become dominant powers instead of Europe, you have no clue... but of course, them becoming so dominant was unlikely.
Except the world was dominated by Asian powers from 2000 BC to 1750 CE and yet Asia had 5x less wars in this period than Euro-barbarians from 500 BC to 1950s.
Ah, yes, successful multi-ethnic nations... China, where all non-Han peoples are second-rate citizens and held in disdain. India, where 70% of deaths of children under 5 years of age happen due to malnutrition. Or Iran, which barely functions. Wondruous!
1. Malnutrition has jack shyte to do with multi-ethnic or mono-ethnic societies, moron. It has everything to do with British barbarity, turning a land that was 25% of the world's GDP in 1750 to 2% in 1940, to build Europe. in fact, there is ZERO difference in wealth between the largest ethnicities and the smallest ones in these nations, while in Euro-primitive barbarian empires, one ethnicity was LEGALLY dominant over the others- english over everyone else, Austrian Germans over the rest ( with Hungarians a close second), etc. Your primitive barbarian europe failed in multi-ethnic nations, precisely because they were NOT multi-ethnic but mono-ethnic domination of other ethnicities. Something we asians do not partake in, which is why we are more socially advanced than you barbarians.
2. All non-Han being second class citizen in China is standard Euro-propaganda. Sorry, zero time for it. China has historically functioned far BETTER than any european empire/kingdom has and has been far more multi-ethnic in the process.
3. Han is an invented ethnicity by Europeans, its as as 'ethnically homogenous' as European ethnicity is. Han itself has greater ethnic and linguistic diversity inside it than the entire primitive balkans do.
4. Same applies for Iran. They are oppressive islamist mullahs, but they are not primitive barbarians like you southern slavs, given that Iran's azeri, Irani, Luri, Balochi, Kurdi and Turkomani ethnicities live happily together, without a whiff of secessionism. This make them more socially advanced than you primitive euro barbarians.
Racism has existed since before humans could be considered humans, so you are again engaging in ignorant prattle... just business as usual with you, I guess.
Nope. Its the classical greeks who invented racism, ie, classifying people on the basis of phenotype and attributing traits to them. prior to Euro-barbarians exporting racism to the whole world, there was ZERO instance of racism in recorded history of the non-european world. This is why in the entire history of pre-euro-primitive contact with India or China, the entire body of literature of these countries regarded each other as their kindred and closer to each other, than they were to the Turks/Mongols : due to shared ideology.
Racism is an invention of europeans, because Europeans are the weakest genotype in humanity, with ALL hall-mark European features :blonde, blue-eyed, white skinned features being inferior ( recessive) genes and thus requiring racism to preserve itself.
THIS is why greeks invented racism exactly 3 minutes after the Doric invasion, which is the first time white people start having presence in Greece.
en.wikipedia.org
