UnderFingy
New Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2021
- Messages
- 1,007
- Likes
- 6,667
who is this fella, the tweet OP?
does India have a project or a roadmap for AMCA's engines?
He’s @Karthiwho is this fella, the tweet OP?
VeryHow reliable is this guy?
Others will know better than me but RR and SAFRAN are the likely candidates to help India bring a 110kN engine into existence in time for it to be used to power AMCA Mk2 (with internal weapons bay) which should follow AMCA Mk1 using GE F414 engines.does India have a project or a roadmap for AMCA's engines?
Is there a timeline for the engine program?Others will know better than me but RR and SAFRAN are the likely candidates to help India bring a 110kN engine into existence in time for it to be used to power AMCA Mk2 (with internal weapons bay) which should follow AMCA Mk1 using GE F414 engines.
Some months ago I read that talks with RR are taking place and are scheduled to finish by the end of 2021. No doubt talks are also going on with SAFRAN. My guess is that the nature of RR's offer will be known by the end of this year. I guess what SAFRAN is offering will also be known soon. How soon is soon? I don't know.Is there a timeline for the engine program?
If my memory is correct, it could take 3-6 years if everything goes smoothly. It also depend on the capacity of the testing facility and experience of the team.How long for dry thrust engine to be finalised for high altitude and flying testbed testing? I wonder if testing Kaveri engine on the Russian airframe used before would involve much work in bolting it on again.
wait isn't DTTI working group on Jet engines dead ??How reliable is this guy?
How reliable is this guy?
I think Jha reported that DTTI on engines was indeed dead. But now that we have some idea that Kaveri might be out of the woods, Americans may now be trying to offer us the same tech they once denied.wait isn't DTTI working group on Jet engines dead ??
does India have a project or a roadmap for AMCA's engines?
Nothing public, other than the fact that they want to get it ready in time for AMCA Mk2 induction in 2035.Is there a timeline for the engine program?
Yep, at least theoretically they have solved it. Will be testing it right now. Maybe we get some good news by next year in DefExpo.Have we solved combustion and screetch issue besides creep in non-dry variant of kaveri?
Not theoretically mate, they proved it experimentally, ofcourse they have to prove it by using the same new flame holders in the AB though. We have to wait for few more years to knowYep, at least theoretically they have solved it. Will be testing it right now. Maybe we get some good news by next year in DefExpo.
If what you said is true, then it may be the indication that Kaveri is close to achieve its full potential. The days for Kaveri are bright again after a looongggg timeI think Jha reported that DTTI on engines was indeed dead. But now that we have some idea that Kaveri might be out of the woods, Americans may now be trying to offer us the same tech they once denied.
Americans always do that. When we are not close enough to achieving a technology in-house, they deny us ToT, but the moment we get close enough they start making offers.
It would be interesting to hear what SAFRAN is up to with FCAS engine development.Conrad Banks, chief engineer for future programs at Rolls-Royce, described the “Integrated Power System” that his company was developing for Tempest, which would combine the gas turbines with aircraft electrical systems. The IPS would serve as a “flying power station” that would provide 10 times more power to sensors and systems compared with the Typhoon, and also enable the use of directed energy. The design would provide for the ingestion of over 100 kg of air per second; combustion chambers operating at 2,000 deg C; and feature vapor cycles, distortion-tolerant fans, and advanced heat exchangers. Rolls-Royce used simulation tools to predict thermal flows and hotspots. AI would help calculate, for instance, how much power goes to charging batteries versus providing a power surge margin. Although the project would still require hardware testing, there would be no need to build eight full-scale development engines as in the case of the Typhoon. “We’re targeting a 50 percent reduction in development time,” Banks added.