Kumaoni
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2022
- Messages
- 8,555
- Likes
- 23,190
China can’t destroy US in night.
China can’t destroy US in night.
I saw his old video replacing china with india and i loved the way he put everythingChina can’t destroy US in night.
Let's be honest. Even if, somehow sense was knocked into the brains of gernails and SF officers, the above setup won't happen. What we can hope for is at least a well-performing AR-style rifle with proper optics and proper night vision goggles and basic PPE. And trust me, even one of the three things I mentioned will be a monumental change at this point.View attachment 211445
This is the type of rifle setup i would like for Indian SF common lower with two uppers one 14.5 inch upper with Elcan 4x and one 16/18 inch upper with lpvo
View attachment 211445
This is the type of rifle setup i would like for Indian SF common lower with two uppers one 14.5 inch upper with Elcan 4x and one 16/18 inch upper with lpvo
War Establishment of an airborne battalion was based on infantry battalions, special forces battalions had a different TO&E that had evolved from their commando days into special forces one.Vineet Koka is from Para airborne.Still hearing from his interview gives a vibe that their probation too is of 6 months and too tough just like SF ie 120 kms speed march,10 days straight sleepless nights and so on.Definitely more tougher than 82nd airborne or VDV.So how does they exactly fit into the orabat or they differ from SF in terms of capability.Is their any merit in the demand of airborne officers for getting parity with SF
The thing is, Para Airborne isn't trained the same as SF but the other way around. In the Indian Army, the same kind of training with the same intensity is provided to Airborne and SF. SF needs to be trained differently and in a wider spectrum of capabilities. So the demand of airborne officers to be treated equally to SF isn't exactly wrong because Para SF is nothing better than Airborne infantry with Balidaan batches on their chest at this point. They are the same in equipment, training, and mission profiles (mostly CI/CT). No point in segregating the two. Might as well make everyone SF at this point.Vineet Koka is from Para airborne.Still hearing from his interview gives a vibe that their probation too is of 6 months and too tough just like SF ie 120 kms speed march,10 days straight sleepless nights and so on.Definitely more tougher than 82nd airborne or VDV.So how does they exactly fit into the orabat or they differ from SF in terms of capability.Is their any merit in the demand of airborne officers for getting parity with SF
Is that a Racal cobra?View attachment 211482
Million dollars worth of comms&electronics right here
most probablyIs that a Racal cobra?
I don't know about 120km speed march though Kamal Sidhu sir or 6th Para told me once that they had to do 60km speed marchWar Establishment of an airborne battalion was based on infantry battalions, special forces battalions had a different TO&E that had evolved from their commando days into special forces one.
Prolonged usage of troops from the regiment in CI led to false sense of equivalence with SF since they conducted similiar operations, you can see this throughout the infantry circles.
I cannot clarify vineet sir's position on probation period since no battalion ever had 120km speed march as standard as far as i know.
I hope im not breaching some security SOPView attachment 211482
Million dollars worth of comms&electronics right here
Any radio in our arsenal with satcom capabilities like Falcon III AN/PRC-117GI hope im not breaching some security SOP
Left to Right
- RF-7800H-MP with TRI KDU
- Racal acoustics RA3185 Modular Cobra Headset with earpad
- RA3710/0431 PTT
- L3Harris RF-7850S SPR secure personal radio
- L3Harris RF-7800M/7850M-HH handheld radio
- portable Battery
- Panasonic Toughbook cf-33
- (??)
- power backup
- (??)
- some sort of tripod (most likely for a laser designator, para SF uses Elbit PLDR-III Serpent and CORAL)
Apparently, yes.Any radio in our arsenal with satcom capabilities like Falcon III AN/PRC-117G
View attachment 211551
Plus the standalone briefcase satcom terminal weve been using since long backApparently, yes.
Every Ghatak troops, para regt and IAF/IN SOF have bought these -
For those wondering, yeah thats an ATAK on panasonic toughbook n1 on the front pageApparently, yes.
Every Ghatak troops, para regt and IAF/IN SOF have bought these -
Again we come back to the same point - need a separate SF division/regiment whatever.Vineet Koka is from Para airborne.Still hearing from his interview gives a vibe that their probation too is of 6 months and too tough just like SF ie 120 kms speed march,10 days straight sleepless nights and so on.Definitely more tougher than 82nd airborne or VDV.So how does they exactly fit into the orabat or they differ from SF in terms of capability.Is their any merit in the demand of airborne officers for getting parity with SF
Just proof that india has not had SF capability perhaps ever, the ‘commando’ mindset never went anywhere nor does the conventional leadership understand strategic nonconventional fightingVineet Koka is from Para airborne.Still hearing from his interview gives a vibe that their probation too is of 6 months and too tough just like SF ie 120 kms speed march,10 days straight sleepless nights and so on.Definitely more tougher than 82nd airborne or VDV.So how does they exactly fit into the orabat or they differ from SF in terms of capability.Is their any merit in the demand of airborne officers for getting parity with SF
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | SSS Defence M72 5.56×45mm carbine which is undergoing trials with the Indian Special Forces | Indian Army | 15 | |
Restructuring of Indian Special Forces | Indian Army | 27 | ||
Indian Armed Forces Special Operations Division (AF-SOD) | Strategic Forces | 106 | ||
H | Modernization of Indian Special Forces | Strategic Forces | 24 |