Doesn't matter. Can you understand the bureaucracy you would need to get an Authorization to pick an encounter site and get approval from new Delhi. Also don't forget the encounter site is not static
It's inside indian territory. One size fits all. Also always the risk of nomads/villagers etc etc somewhere out in the wilderness.
Seems a perverse logic if getting the auth from Delhi is correct
the fact that drones have been used means that auth is there. Once the drones narrowly pinpoint the site and paras landed from helis close to it, then I really do not understand the rationale of current Roe that the helis cannot strafe the site when contact is achieved.
the nomads/villagers have an acute sense of self preservation--will scamper on knowing of an operation
'hearts and minds'---no one gives a f... about that. Never worked and never will. The reasonable one will not object to a terrorist die, the unreasonable one--well, they are unreasonable!!
There was some mention of NE India and helms being used there and not in Kashmir. Considering that both are parts of India--why the double standards.
it all points back to the fact that both our political and military ( because of years of political interference ) hierarchy are letting our braves fight and die with one arm tied behind their backs
Just my 2 pennies worth. I am sure the more knowledgeable members will have their point of view.