India-China Border conflict

Blademaster

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
9,675
Likes
28,005
Rockdog, please don't accept my post as an indication that PLA kicked our Indian ass. Our IA woke up and finally chase your PLA's ass out and even whupped your PLA's ass in 1967.
 

mist_consecutive

Golgappe Expert
New Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
5,163
Likes
42,880
Country flag

Someone forgot to tell Manojwa we've a date with destiny as far as China's concerned. If I didn't know better this seems a replay of the events leading up to 1962.

Artillery modernization is meandering, rocket force is yet to be raised, we're doing somewhat better as far as drones go with micro & minis being sourced locally & the heavier long endurance ones imported, Agniveers gradually taking over, etc.

One would've thought the best way forward in such a grim scenario would be to increase manpower intake or at least leave them at current levels. Sadly not to be.

The top brass seems to be totally out of their depths. This is going to end very badly.
I support this move. We have too much extra flab which is wasted on absolutely nothing actually. Army will be knowing better.

Just FYI, cutting down troops doesn't mean we will be removing active infantry or armour brigades, no. What COAS means is removing all the extra roles & jobs which are not required.


Besides this, we should remember that we have BSF, ITBP, SSB and Assam Rifles as first line of defence. Army is a purely offensive arm which takes over when threat is obvious. CAPFs have participated & will participate in any active conflict in future.

Future of warfare is not infantry wave. It is mechanized, autonomous & man-unmanned teaming.

China has also recently downsized their army.

 

rockdog

New Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
4,249
Likes
3,025
Country flag
Will meet the same fate as the Gwadar port in Pakistan.

Chinese nationals working in this project will be neutralized by the rebels and the locals.
This one is better, half of rebel armies speaks Chinese, if you would google Kokang race.

Half of pipelines goes through rebel areas.

And this deal says there will be 10km extended range China would deploy armed guard from chinese security companies.
 

Azaad

New Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2022
Messages
8,400
Likes
31,090
Country flag
This one is better, half of rebel armies speaks Chinese, if you would google Kokang race.

Half of pipelines goes through rebel areas.

And this deal says there will be 10km extended range China would deploy armed guard from chinese security companies.
Evidently you don't know where are the Kokang or the Wu located do you wumao ? Which is why you think this'd be a cakewalk .
 

Jimih

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2021
Messages
22,994
Likes
134,628
Country flag
This one is better, half of rebel armies speaks Chinese, if you would google Kokang race.
Where there is Kokangs in Rakhine state where the so called "port" is coming?

This project is doomed from the start.
 

Jimih

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2021
Messages
22,994
Likes
134,628
Country flag
Evidently you don't know where are the Kokang or the Wu located do you wumao ? Which is why you think this'd be a cakewalk .
He and all the Chinese members here in DFI main source of info is from heavily moderated Weibo.
 

JBH22

New Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
6,554
Likes
18,090
I support this move. We have too much extra flab which is wasted on absolutely nothing actually. Army will be knowing better.

Just FYI, cutting down troops doesn't mean we will be removing active infantry or armour brigades, no. What COAS means is removing all the extra roles & jobs which are not required.


Besides this, we should remember that we have BSF, ITBP, SSB and Assam Rifles as first line of defence. Army is a purely offensive arm which takes over when threat is obvious. CAPFs have participated & will participate in any active conflict in future.

Future of warfare is not infantry wave. It is mechanized, autonomous & man-unmanned teaming.

China has also recently downsized their army.

Maybe what is not required to cut down troop strength, but instead do away with the tradition of using troops for showpiece role.
Doing away with the sahayak crap can be useful {Can someone confirm if it is on going}
 

another_armchair

New Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
12,096
Likes
54,387
Country flag
Maybe what is not required to cut down troop strength, but instead do away with the tradition of using troops for showpiece role.
Doing away with the sahayak crap can be useful {Can someone confirm if it is on going}
Will Dumbocrats and junior IPS officers(captain rank level) give away their private army of domestic help, gardeners, cook, sweeper etc?

Areyyyy.. aise kaise?
 

Corvus Splendens

New Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2021
Messages
4,185
Likes
27,015
Country flag
u don't have enough knowledge about the J20, even claimes that ws10 was from AL31...

View attachment 235718

And didn't know the latest engine is new type named ws15...

View attachment 235719

Let me recalled u claimed Tibet railway was powered by HSR..

View attachment 235720

Plz, @Azaad for contributing good contents in this thread, stop making false information. Thank you.
Every goddamn engine you have in your fighters are either based on the AL-31 or the RD-33/93. Don't just bullshit whatever you want in a condescending tone. You think we're all idiots here huh ?
 

Azaad

New Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2022
Messages
8,400
Likes
31,090
Country flag
I support this move. We have too much extra flab which is wasted on absolutely nothing actually. Army will be knowing better.

Just FYI, cutting down troops doesn't mean we will be removing active infantry or armour brigades, no. What COAS means is removing all the extra roles & jobs which are not required.

The tweet I quoted mentions 1 lakh troops to be Downsized / Rightsized . The interview you've linked quotes 2 lakhs to be Downsized / Rightsized with elaborate explanations on tooth to tail ratio. Are we to understand that the tooth to tail ratio extends to 2 lakh such personnel in a force of a little over 1 million men ?


Besides this, we should remember that we have BSF, ITBP, SSB and Assam Rifles as first line of defence. Army is a purely offensive arm which takes over when threat is obvious. CAPFs have participated & will participate in any active conflict in future.
Sure they will & by the looks of it we seem to be planning unconsciously towards such an end . But is that the primary mandate of these Border Guards & CAPFs or is deployment of these forces in frontline combat our attempt at last ditch defence ?


Future of warfare is not infantry wave. It is mechanized, autonomous & man-unmanned teaming.
Mountain Warfare eats up your human resources which is why what you've posted doesn't hold relevance to mountain warfare.

Moreover just to cite one example in favour of my argument - with drone warfare becoming ubiquitous including in the mountains we'd require dedicated teams on the frontline ( apart from ones operating the long endurance heavy drones ) to operate such micro & mini drones apart from loitering munitions as well as be part of anti drone warfare teams.

Does that call for more trained personnel or less unless we plan to redeploy those "downsized / rightsized" into drone & counter drone warfare ?

China has also recently downsized their army.


China has downsized its army & most of the excess manpower have been absorbed into the PLAN , PLAAF , People's Armed Police - PAP & their militias which function as supporting arms to the PLAGF (similar to our CAPFs with multiple responsibilities & as per recent reforms are now answerable only to the CMC which is also the supreme decision making body in China as far as the armed forces go , in charge of all the armed forces & their auxiliary arms ) or reorganized into the newly created PLARF & other such units since the theaterization of their armed services began.

 
Top