Nope the CCP dont have the intention to fight, else they wudnt be steeping this low. The sissy minded chinese can resort to such cheap psyops only, they dont dare to pick a gun and face a real combat
No, the CCP does actually have the intention to start a war and gobble up territories and resources now that they are on a decline. They want to establish some major gains before their growth finally peaks and they come crashing down. I had made a post about this a while back.
The only difference is that they are much more cautious now. They do realize that this is not 1962, and they cannot afford to be the aggressors or to look like one. They also cannot afford a losing war, because that will accelerate their collapse even further. Whatever they do, they must win. Hence, they are opting for such tactics to hit the government with a multi-pronged attack.
The most interesting aspect here, is their continued pattern of saying "India was the aggressor". I may not know much about the technical and military aspects of this conflict, but I do know that this is the most classic textbook tactic of initiating a conflict.
And history is proof of this. Just look at the Six Day War.
On 5 June 1967 a cluster of planes flying from Egypt to Israel was seen on King Hussein's radar screen. Convinced by the Egyptians that the planes were theirs, he promptly gave the order to attack - in Jerusalem! In fact the planes were Israel's, returning from their devastating attack against the Egyptian airforce, which surprisingly had been taken by surprise; after taunting Rabin, Egypt was not ready when he came.
Whilst all branches of the service had performed well, the Air Force had, for the first time, played a decisive role: clearing the skies at the outset made all that followed possible.
This is in specific reference to the initial airstrike performed by Israel. Did Egypt deserve getting its shit kicked in? Yes.
But the point still remains that Israel dealt the first strike in the conflict and Israel felt it important to deny this for a decade. Today they themselves admit that they started the war and their official stance is that it was a preemptive strike. The word they use is
"anticipatory self defense".
They
believed that they would be attacked and that Egypt was planning to start a conflict, so they attacked first and "stopped" them. For a long time, they said Egypt was the aggressor, but finally admitted that they started the war.
Today, the Chinks celebrate 1962 as a great achievement too. It's the same modus operandi. They will continue to claim that we are attacking them and trying to start a conflict and so, in "anticipatory self defense", they will launch an actual attack to start a war and gain their objectives. In order to not seem like the aggressors, heralding us as the attackers and poor John Chinaman defending itself is necessary. It is not even a point of contention now.
The Chinks are scared that they have reached their peak and are about to decline and get overtaken by us, which is why they will definitely start a war to regain some power.
and India
events
.
