jai jaganath
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2022
- Messages
- 5,975
- Likes
- 10,474
![India Country flag](https://defenceforumindia.com/misc/flags/shiny/32/India.png)
No I mean reports the GOI publishing those are face saverchina helped India to save face...... kek chomu
No I mean reports the GOI publishing those are face saverchina helped India to save face...... kek chomu
Truth of the matter is India lacks military power to do any offensive against China. Hence, the govt. wants to hush the matter.Yes
But we here recieve reports that they have disengaged bcoz we need a face saver
GOI is publishing reports? RoflmaoNo I mean reports the GOI publishing those are face saver
Original positions? Meaning pre Galwan?Yes
But we here recieve reports that they have disengaged bcoz we need a face saver
They basically went back to original positions
He means pro govt. media obfuscating the fact that we are actually losing some land from our previous positions.GOI is publishing reports? Roflmao
First i am told numerous reports claim that China did not disengage, then I am told that the reports did disengage? Can I get a coherent picture please? Do you have proof if they did or didn’t disengageHe means pro govt. media obfuscating the fact that we are actually losing some land from our previous positions.
But the thing is Chinese will keep pushing us in years to come, they are also heavily building up military infra on their side next to chicken's neck.
Anything published by Ani or govt sources in various news outlets are given by govt intentionallyGOI is publishing reports? Roflmao
No I mean reports the GOI publishing those are face saver
reports the GOI publishing those are face saver has nothing to do with But we here recieve reports that they have disengaged bcoz we need a face saver
Lol wtf? Are you saying that Indian gov is like the Chinese gov in regards to media?Anything published by Ani or govt sources in various news outlets are given by govt intentionally
Things are not absolute they vary depending on situationsLol wtf? Are you saying that Indian gov is like the Chinese gov in regards to media?
You realize most of the reports of india losing land came from Indian media sources rightThings are not absolute they vary depending on situations
We don't know , we bloody dont know it !!!You realize most of the reports of india losing land came from Indian media sources right
I didn’t mean just barren land like that. I meant that it doesn’t mean we are defeated, and said land can be recapturedAlright, enough of me being a mute spectator of this shit-flinging show boosted by misinterpretation and propaganda.
Answering & clearing some wrong notions few members are harvesting -
1. India lost territory:- As it currently stands, we lost no territory except, perhaps in perception at PP17A where they intruded, and thereafter the buffer zone created is to their advantage. People saying we lost territory in Depsang, well we did, just not in 2020, but way back in 2008-2013, so bless your Gandhian leaders.
2. Buffer zone is territory lost:- Wrong notion. The buffer zone is a temporary no patrol zone, made to build trust between both sides so that eye-to-eye confrontation, which can easily melt down into something like Galwan clash, cannot happen.
The buffer zones will be back to normal and patrolling resumed by both sides when things cool down. When it will cool down, well it can be 2 months, or 5 years, nobody knows.
3. It's just barren land:- Barren or not, it is our territory. China is ready to fight a war with India for these barren patches of land, which should show you its importance. Siachen is more hostile and barren, and probably the most dangerous battlefield on the entire earth. Still, we are holding it for the last 40 years.
4. GoI is taking suckers deal to show Ladakh is resolved:- You overestimate the memory of common mango people. They completely forgot about Ladakh within a year. Common people are too busy boycotting Brahmastra.
What's the logic of point 1? Nehru lost 38000 km^2, so until Modi loses 38001 Km^2 he should not be criticized ? And after that if Kejru comes he should not be criticized till he loses 38002 Km^2 ?Alright, enough of me being a mute spectator of this shit-flinging show boosted by misinterpretation and propaganda.
Answering & clearing some wrong notions few members are harvesting -
1. India lost territory:- As it currently stands, we lost no territory except, perhaps in perception at PP17A where they intruded, and thereafter the buffer zone created is to their advantage. People saying we lost territory in Depsang, well we did, just not in 2020, but way back in 2008-2013, so bless your Gandhian leaders.
2. Buffer zone is territory lost:- Wrong notion. The buffer zone is a temporary no patrol zone, made to build trust between both sides so that eye-to-eye confrontation, which can easily melt down into something like Galwan clash, cannot happen.
The buffer zones will be back to normal and patrolling resumed by both sides when things cool down. When it will cool down, well it can be 2 months, or 5 years, nobody knows.
3. It's just barren land:- Barren or not, it is our territory. China is ready to fight a war with India for these barren patches of land, which should show you its importance. Siachen is more hostile and barren, and probably the most dangerous battlefield on the entire earth. Still, we are holding it for the last 40 years.
4. GoI is taking suckers deal to show Ladakh is resolved:- You overestimate the memory of common mango people. They completely forgot about Ladakh within a year. Common people are too busy boycotting Brahmastra.
p2..buffer zones maybe temporary but we dont know when this standoff will end ..so for the locals who use these lands for grazing might not get acess to these lands for god knows how long and if im right then buffer zones are on our side and not much on their side...doesnt that make us net losers here till everything goes back to "normal"...which i doubt it will for a long timeAlright, enough of me being a mute spectator of this shit-flinging show boosted by misinterpretation and propaganda.
Answering & clearing some wrong notions few members are harvesting -
1. India lost territory:- As it currently stands, we lost no territory except, perhaps in perception at PP17A where they intruded, and thereafter the buffer zone created is to their advantage. People saying we lost territory in Depsang, well we did, just not in 2020, but way back in 2008-2013, so bless your Gandhian leaders.
2. Buffer zone is territory lost:- Wrong notion. The buffer zone is a temporary no patrol zone, made to build trust between both sides so that eye-to-eye confrontation, which can easily melt down into something like Galwan clash, cannot happen.
The buffer zones will be back to normal and patrolling resumed by both sides when things cool down. When it will cool down, well it can be 2 months, or 5 years, nobody knows.
3. It's just barren land:- Barren or not, it is our territory. China is ready to fight a war with India for these barren patches of land, which should show you its importance. Siachen is more hostile and barren, and probably the most dangerous battlefield on the entire earth. Still, we are holding it for the last 40 years.
4. GoI is taking suckers deal to show Ladakh is resolved:- You overestimate the memory of common mango people. They completely forgot about Ladakh within a year. Common people are too busy boycotting Brahmastra.
Take your liberty in criticizing Modi. I personally find his ever-growing softness disgusting.What's the logic of point 1? Nehru lost 38000 km^2, so until Modi loses 38001 Km^2 he should not be criticized ? And after that if Kejru comes he should not be criticized till he loses 38002 Km^2 ?
You are correct in doubting things might take some time to be normal, or might even become worse. Locals residing within 2-3 km of LoC, just till last years were regular victims of shelling and CFVs. This is the cost of war the country and locals has to face.p2..buffer zones maybe temporary but we dont know when this standoff will end ..so for the locals who use these lands for grazing might not get acess to these lands for god knows how long and if im right then buffer zones are on our side and not much on their side...doesnt that make us net losers here till everything goes back to "normal"...which i doubt it will for a long time
if im right then buffer zones are on our side and not much on their side
disengagement == troops very close to each other move back from their forward post (what has happened)
mujhe to samjh hi nahi aaya kuch isme
first green dot could be mud . of the 2 arrows u marked in ur earlier image , 1 is def mud. best wait for confirmationTake your liberty in criticizing Modi. I personally find his ever-growing softness disgusting.
As I said, the only area where we agreed on an unfavorable-sized buffer zone is PP17A. Still, the area is vacated, and both sides lay no control over this land currently. Does that mean we "lost" land? No, did China lose F5 at Pangong Tso ? It is not a "no man's land", its a temporary buffer zone.
You are correct in doubting things might take some time to be normal, or might even become worse. Locals residing within 2-3 km of LoC, just till last years were regular victims of shelling and CFVs. This is the cost of war the country and locals has to face.
But do people forget that the Chinese side also has shepherds and nomads ? They also lost access to the buffer zone lands, didn't they ? I
![]()
See the first green dot from top, that is the end of our side buffer zone. The red dot on top is end of China's buffer zone. I think the difference is around ~1 km, if not more.
I mean, yeah it is a bit more, not really not that significant for pasture land. If things get back to normal (red line is LAC) within even 2-3 years, I will consider it as equal.
So you meant to say,Truth of the matter is India lacks military power to do any offensive against China. Hence, the govt. wants to hush the matter.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
India shifts 50,000 troops to China border | Indian Army | 2 | |
![]() |
India-China 2020 Border conflict | Indian Army | 29497 | |
![]() |
India-China 2020 Border Dispute - Military and Strategic Discussion | Indian Army | 19501 | |
![]() |
India China LAC & International Border Discussions | Indian Army | 26757 |