India-China Border conflict

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,663
Likes
151,106
Country flag
came across this tweet.

while the sentiment is in the right place, there should also be discussions on what are the fundamentals based on which "adventurous response" is not being undertaken by Indian security establishment.

problem statements and expectations are a plenty in the country, it's the solutions that are lacking from the civilian sphere.
===============
Russia, with $1.5T economy, forced US/NATO to negotiating table.

What stops India from standing up to China ?
It's NOT about economy but political will.

China's entire game of "salami slicing" is based on the assumption that India won't risk an escalation to a full blown war.

 

Jimih

New Member
Joined
May 20, 2021
Messages
22,994
Likes
134,628
Country flag
came across this tweet.

while the sentiment is in the right place, there should also be discussions on what are the fundamentals based on which "adventurous response" is not being undertaken by Indian security establishment.

problem statements and expectations are a plenty in the country, it's the solutions that are lacking from the civilian sphere.
===============
Russia, with $1.5T economy, forced US/NATO to negotiating table.

What stops India from standing up to China ?
It's NOT about economy but political will.

China's entire game of "salami slicing" is based on the assumption that India won't risk an escalation to a full blown war.


Also one should not forget Russia's own massive domestic Military Industrial Complex.


Does India have?
Answer is NO. We saw how Rajnath Singh flied to and fro to Russia during current Standoff. For what? Everybody knows.
 
Last edited:

Knowitall

New Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2019
Messages
7,930
Likes
35,898
Also one should not forget Russia's own massive domestic Military Industrial Complex.


Does India have?
Answer is NO. We saw how Rajnath Singh flied to and fro to Russia during current Standoff. For what? Everybody knows.
It is a combination of both political will and military power.

What happened during Galwan had already taken place 2 decades back in the form of parliament attacks. Back then too India was unable to initiate the cold start doctrine. What was supposed to take place in a few days dragged on for weeks which resulted in us losing the initiative and surprise.

When Galwan happened we were in a similar position. Our forces were not in position with adequate spare and supplies the Chinese were already deployed in strength through swift deployment. Both the army and intelligence agencies had absolutely failed to gauge the size or motives of their build up.

Back then i remember some members explaining how India will mobilize and a war is imminent or the govt will go for a repeat of balakot or something like that. Back then too i had argued how the very base of both these premises are wrong.

Balakot happened because India knew that we could control the escalation ladder more or less. What happened the next day was not what we expected but we were still in the control of the situation. The same thing could not be replicated against the chinese.

The other premise that the govt was bidding it's time for a eventual war was straight up stupid.

Ever single day that passed after galwan was us moving further away from the conflict due to a lot of factors from diplomatic pressure to the lack of surprise.

My points are further reinforced by the fact that our political leadership flat out denied any incursion and even today simply ignores the issue with both PM and DM not offering any condolences during the Galwan martyrs day. The other point was the insane hype being generated by central agencies on the SSR case a case that fell flat with barely any arrests or leads.

Thanks to heavy media reporting on the pangong tso issue the govt was forced to drastic steps but even then was unwilling to do much. Once that was done and the glare of media gone we pretty much threw other sectors under the bus and that is a arrangement both the sides are okay with considering the resumption in trade and ties.
 

mokoman

New Member
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
6,484
Likes
34,873
Country flag
LOL , swamy's hi IQ brain .




------------------------



It is a combination of both political will and military power.

What happened during Galwan had already taken place 2 decades back in the form of parliament attacks. Back then too India was unable to initiate the cold start doctrine. What was supposed to take place in a few days dragged on for weeks which resulted in us losing the initiative and surprise.

When Galwan happened we were in a similar position. Our forces were not in position with adequate spare and supplies the Chinese were already deployed in strength through swift deployment. Both the army and intelligence agencies had absolutely failed to gauge the size or motives of their build up.

Back then i remember some members explaining how India will mobilize and a war is imminent or the govt will go for a repeat of balakot or something like that. Back then too i had argued how the very base of both these premises are wrong.

Balakot happened because India knew that we could control the escalation ladder more or less. What happened the next day was not what we expected but we were still in the control of the situation. The same thing could not be replicated against the chinese.

The other premise that the govt was bidding it's time for a eventual war was straight up stupid.

Ever single day that passed after galwan was us moving further away from the conflict due to a lot of factors from diplomatic pressure to the lack of surprise.

My points are further reinforced by the fact that our political leadership flat out denied any incursion and even today simply ignores the issue with both PM and DM not offering any condolences during the Galwan martyrs day. The other point was the insane hype being generated by central agencies on the SSR case a case that fell flat with barely any arrests or leads.

Thanks to heavy media reporting on the pangong tso issue the govt was forced to drastic steps but even then was unwilling to do much. Once that was done and the glare of media gone we pretty much threw other sectors under the bus and that is a arrangement both the sides are okay with considering the resumption in trade and ties.


The other premise that the govt was bidding it's time for a eventual war was straight up stupid.

we will do another kailash peak style peacefull realignment some time between tommorow 1 PM and April 30 2022. use that to end chinese occupation of depsang. i did the astrology reading myself.

:scared1:
 

Hari Sud

New Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
3,945
Likes
8,863
Country flag
Chinese and India at LAC and likely outcome

Chinese are unlikely to backdown and retreat only a few miles at LAC knowing fully well that their retreat, the rest of world and India will interpret it as a defeat. Hence they would not retreat.

They prefer not to fight a war, as its outcome in Himalayas is uncertain. But when two armies are facing each other at a short distance away, then a fight (may not be a war) is inevitable. This fight will not prove that Chinese have a superior army or big military budget or much touted military hardware whose performance is uncertain. It will prove that India can hold of its own or even win a few operations. A bigger war on the scale of WW2 is not possible in Himalayas.

Net outcome will be that much touted propaganda of big Chinese rocket force, or stealth fighters or bombers in the vicinity, which the ignorant media keeps telling us all the time, will vanish. India’s respect in the world will get immense improvement. That Chinese resistance to prevent india becoming a permanent member of Security Council or NSG will also vanish. They probably will not vote for against it, but abstain. That is equal to OK.

But to assume that the Issue of McMohan Line in the east or LAC in the west will be solved, then we are dreaming. To make Chinese give up their stupid claims is to drop a Hydrogen Bomb over Shanghai or Peking.

cheers.
 

srevster

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
3,058
Likes
5,675
Country flag
Chinese and India at LAC and likely outcome

Chinese are unlikely to backdown and retreat only a few miles at LAC knowing fully well that their retreat, the rest of world and India will interpret it as a defeat. Hence they would not retreat.

They prefer not to fight a war, as its outcome in Himalayas is uncertain. But when two armies are facing each other at a short distance away, then a fight (may not be a war) is inevitable. This fight will not prove that Chinese have a superior army or big military budget or much touted military hardware whose performance is uncertain. It will prove that India can hold of its own or even win a few operations. A bigger war on the scale of WW2 is not possible in Himalayas.

Net outcome will be that much touted propaganda of big Chinese rocket force, or stealth fighters or bombers in the vicinity, which the ignorant media keeps telling us all the time, will vanish. India’s respect in the world will get immense improvement. That Chinese resistance to prevent india becoming a permanent member of Security Council or NSG will also vanish. They probably will not vote for against it, but abstain. That is equal to OK.

But to assume that the Issue of McMohan Line in the east or LAC in the west will be solved, then we are dreaming. To make Chinese give up their stupid claims is to drop a Hydrogen Bomb over Shanghai or Peking.

cheers.
Sometimes the best strategy is to give a solid punch and worry about consequences later
 

srevster

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
3,058
Likes
5,675
Country flag

India Super Power

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 3, 2020
Messages
2,190
Likes
4,386
Country flag
Top