How have I chosen to be nonsensical? I suggest you read what Lt Gen Panag said. Without Black Top, the whole mission/operations are useless.
"If Black Top not held then you can not hold Gurung Hill. This is reason why we lost it in 62. My assessment is based solely on terrain knowledge."
"The markings on image are wrong. However, believe whatever you want. I have given you what I assess based on terrain analysis and my experience. If we have not taken Black Top&Helmet then we can not hold Gurung Hill or other areas secured north of Spanggur Gap on 29/30 Aug."
Like I said, IF it is true, I'd be very disappointed. I still don't think it is but I'd be very disappointed after reading Lt Gen Syed Ata Hasnain and Panag's analyses.
If on a satellite imagery there are two groups of tents close to each other or even one know apart how does an interpreter make out which is Chinese and which is Indian?
It is only the official interpreter who knows about the actions/operations, location of operations, quantum of troops likely number of tents, routes taken and general disposition.
Satellite imagery is only a tool of confirmation of what is known or anticipated. If not then other sources are required to interpret and confirm what it is. If a tent is detected on Tora Bora the interpreter must know and be sure it is not US SOF or Marines or Pakistani SSG.
Traditionally interpreter would say he can make out two groups of tents. That is all. The commander having all information then turns that into intelligence.
On the contrary, the satellite image is an indication that requires confirmation from other sources.
Do not try to be expert interpreters here and predict what your prejudices and dirt gathered in mind make you write. See things objectively. Unless you have means of confirmation do not predict. There are lives involved - precious lives.
