Hey yo Islam ain't cool man and many people are islamophobic (in the true sense of the word phobia). Christianity was like that at one point in time but it reformed itself out of its barbaric pasts unlike Islam. One ought to notice the fine line of difference between criticizing Islam (a genuinely aggressive religion criticizing which is not islamophobia) and Muslims who may want to genuinely reform the religion if not, do not follow the holy book completely to its fullest in other words are not radical.Islam is radical in nature(sadly) but its followers can choose whether to be radical or not.
Highly OT move further replies to appropriate threads.
islam is not reformable like christianity and that is something people miss.
islam is like a cd -r and chritianity is like cd-rw due to some rules and values and because of jebus figure canbe subverted along certain lines and this continous whataboutery and subversion is what lead to the countries adopting it overcome it.
this is both bad and good in regards to christianity depending upon your perspective and objective.
tell me how are you going to subvert islam without brute force of some kind or the people following it being massively captured and subjected to seculariztion like that of ccp.
you cant refer to mohammed to reform it as he did not want to change it or the muslim to be anything not like him.so that is a non-starter.the qurans words can be disobeyed directly which means no serious muslim can go against invasion and expansion which is the stated aim of the memes in the book.so the book protects itself from change and revision by granting itself the status of god to be protected by any random muslim who can take matters into his own hands.this also has the affect of empowering the natural genetic gundas and coniving types among them and diempowers the natural genetic peacniks and intellectual types.
the peacniks and intellectual types anyway dont have much street power and with these self protection suite of quran and mohammed any chance of reform and change is reduced to almost nil by these groups which happens in other religions.
this is why IF there is an effort to reform islam by a group, it must have a tankie component attached to the intellectual reformer component like the a infantry division given an attachment of heavy armour.
this way the the tankies who are more likely street power/hard power types like warlords/military types/state backed police can protect the soft and squishy reformers.
most of the reforming of islam in the arab world is done by coincidence and is not planned with a purpose and that is why most are unsucceddfula nd if successful,easily unravel.they are usually conducted by the generallismo types who want to gain power and just want to manager islam as it is very chaotic to their new regime(although they are far better than the clusterf**k and self goal inflicting west).the only purpose built and planned efforts till now have been done by atta turk in turkey and modern day ccp.