Correct. My point earlier in response to Bhadra was that skirmishes and localized conflict at the border is never going to solve the border problem. India want's long term peace and that is not going to happen based on the present strategy of "mirror deployments". Fighting the Chinese at the border is like the firemen running from house to house to put out the fire while the person who is setting the fire is always one step ahead. You have to catch the person setting the fire. That necessarily means being able to threaten China from all sides, by land, air and sea, and since India does not have that capability now, it means that India has to re-think it's entire NAM posture and seriously look at entering into some kind of alliance or alliances. That is if India is interested in solving the China problem otherwise it will fester as long as the CCP is running China.the point I think being made is that India should not accept LAC being militarized in that way for years.
either fight a war and establish whatever boundaries come about at the end of it or agree to PLA demands now and establish a boundary.
Given we know PLA doesn't want to establish boundary, fighting a war is the best option and the way to trigger it is to keep reverse salami slicing and calling PLA's bluff.
And by the way the border problem would in all likelihood have been present even if the Nationalists under Chiang Kai Shek were in power in Beijing. In 1914 at the Simla conference it was the Nationalist representative who was non committal and did not sign the final document and in the 1930s and 1940s when Nehru met Chiang Kai Shek, the Nationalist leader insisted that friendly relations between China and India were contingent on India recognizing China's suzerainty over Tibet.