iNorthernerOn9
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2021
- Messages
- 1,478
- Likes
- 16,913
So it offers protection against 5000km class ballistic missiles & not just 1500km class as was being claimed yesterday.
That's A-235... & not S-500(which has TEL cannister like S-400 but only 2 missiles per launcher)
This is reportedly the S-500. WTF are they using as the engine? I have never seen an object accelerate that fast before. How are people claiming AD-1 is on-par/ better than this? Isnt the AD-1 alot slower in comparison?
Reminds me of the Sprint Missile(0 to Mach 10 in 15 seconds):That's not S-500... that A-135.
It is not S-500, this is the Russian A-235 PL-19 Nudol meant to take out satellites, ICBM and hypersonic missiles.
This is reportedly the S-500. WTF are they using as the engine? I have never seen an object accelerate that fast before. How are people claiming AD-1 is on-par/ better than this? Isnt the AD-1 alot slower in comparison?
How come a speed like this would make AD-1 any better?
This is reportedly the S-500. WTF are they using as the engine? I have never seen an object accelerate that fast before. How are people claiming AD-1 is on-par/ better than this? Isnt the AD-1 alot slower in comparison?
Hypersonic targets that are in terminal stage? Although I think the entire don radars are hiding their bigger capabilities....from what I read even during chaotic 90's certain sensitive areas were off limits to american gangs in kremlin and this is one of them along with few other ones. My opinion is anti sats are not as challenging as some of the other aero-ballistic and non baliisitc such as gliding hypersonic ones.How come a speed like this would make AD-1 any better?
L&T Sudarshan Close In Weapon System (CIWS)
Sudarshan CIWS in pic looks to be under some kind of field trials and consists of
1. Search Radar & Command Control Unit (left side)
2. 40mm Air Defence gun with Programmable Ammunition (center)
3. Fire Control Radar (right side)
You are mostly right on the big picture...The IAF may use a similar system. I believe something like this is already in the works which will leverage the Netra and connect it with the IACCS.
Besides all our ground based radars and Sam systems be it E Shorads like Spyder SR or Akash mk1 to MRSAM and the long ranged S-400 are all plugged into the IACCS. So whatever one radar detects and tracks irrespective of the geographical area, the requisite feed is available to the rest of the shooters and sensors plugged into the network.
If totally indigenous then thats a tall accomplishment as navalizing something like this comes with challenging requirements with size and weight restrictions but they do have experience in hitech areas coming from involvement in nuke subs, so who knows. I still think they partnered in the hardware side minus the radars and software.....99% kill rate with one round is a bit unbelievable for me but it depends on target type as rounds are programmable......So Sudarshan or theevra is licensed built Italian 40mm?Leonardo provides latest-generation Marlin 40 naval defence system to Indonesia
The Independent Line of Sight (ILOS) variant of the 40mm turret will equip the Indonesian Navy’s PC60 fast patrol boats and Tank Landing Ship vessels.defence-industry.eu
Russia edited the original footage and deleted a few frames for secrecy, that is why it appears fast. Unedited video have not been released to public yet. But my guess would be it would be quite fast due a-235's size. Us had a kinda similar missile named nike Hercules.How come a speed like this would make AD-1 any better?
So the question is actually the order got for Leonardo or L&T both are claiming the contract.L&T to supply Teevra 40mm naval guns to Indoensian Navy.
So the question is actually the order got for Leonardo or L&T both are claiming the contract.
The gun is surely the l&t built posted on Ig. Most likely a jv thing and these will be made by l&t.According the document, PGAD also known as Programme LRSAM is for both: IAF and IN.
The same with THAAD.
This is reportedly the S-500. WTF are they using as the engine? I have never seen an object accelerate that fast before. How are people claiming AD-1 is on-par/ better than this? Isnt the AD-1 alot slower in comparison?
I wonder how Big is AD-1 missile. Seems like a truncated AAD missile mounted on top of Pralay missile motor
So 12 meter length. Weight total 3.5 tons? Range in anti aircraft SAM role 400-500km and in Anti Ballistic role, say 200km?
Where is the question of Leonardo getting the contract . The gun in question is the L70 40 mm Bofors gun being made by OFB since ages. Even Leonardo is the licensed version of the gun . They have no role in this productSo the question is actually the order got for Leonardo or L&T both are claiming the contract.
JVC ( jet vane control ) is the appropriate terminology instead of guide vanesAs i have mentioned earlier, the 1st stage booster has guide vanes for thrust vectoring.
View attachment 180203
Plus there's the set of four fins for aerodynamic control.
Am pretty sure that the second stage also has guide vanes for TVC. Fine milli second high lateral G maneuvering will be required for a kinetic hit or for a close proximity burst in the absence of a KV. Plus in the less denser air aerodynamic control isn't that effective.
The second stage is hypersonic and has a directed blast warhead. So all those complaining about the lack of speed vis a vis Thaad can sleep peacefully in the knowledge that the missile will get to its intended target in the least possible time.
The first stage is indeed thick. Almost Pralay like . I am not very sure. But what I am sure about us AD-1 having a 400+ km range . 500 ish will be more accurate. This ultra long range will enable it to hit maneuvering RV and HGV with considerable ease since the second stage itself will be having considerable KE to zig zag and maneuver to keep up with the Maneuvering vehicle .
Or the technical thing to say is the second stage has a rather large volume NEZ.