Pure conjecture, nothing else. Tejas Mk1A, LCH, Arjun Mk1A, DRDO AWACS based on AI's Airbus, C-295, AK-103, Predator drones, agreement with the US to develop drones under DTTI to name just a few.
And are you saying that PM Modi is the brains behind this? No, he had given free hand to Gen. Rawat who was his most trusted military officer apart from Ninda Turtle politically speaking. As a member here mentioned in another post, there has to be some really pressing issues for the PM to directly step in.
ever hear about LCA Tejas?
I meant we would have developed
AND operationalized a domestic fighter jet 3 decades ago. Not carried a 3-decade old project till today. In short, AMCA should have been our recent induct right now.
Extracted from Radiance in Indian Skies- The Tejas Saga. Clearly mentioned by Dr VS Arunachalam that the jet engine collab was smooth, FBW was successful- they did not help with CLAWs- so entered our own CLAW man Dr Deodhare.
View attachment 124977
Maybe because jet engines are sold as black boxes with enough IP protection baked in legally & of course the profit margins are fat- so they had no issues ever with engine supply.
Check
this out. There seem to be conflicting reports.
Selected does not mean procured. There is no way the F414 will fit inside either Mk1 or Mk1A.
GE itself mentions the F414-INS6 is still in development- & will probably be the most powerful iteration of F414 when the procurement deal is signed (just like F404 powering Mk1 and its variants).
View attachment 124982
F414Engine
www.geaviation.com
We have only between 2 to a dozen+ F414s (depending on who you believe) delivered as the initial lot (separate from 404s)
View attachment 124998
General Electric or GE has delivered two qualified 414 engines to be tested on the planned homegrown Tejas Mk-2 single engine fighter and is looking to collaborate with India to build engines for the proposed advanced medium combat aircraft (AMCA). The Tejas fighter has been powered by the...
www.business-standard.com
This is really interesting! Thanks for sharing. I wasn't aware that there would be a significant size difference.
Never gonna happen, unfortunately, we are not China, and stealing is not an option. The cure for a sanction-happy regime in America is money- like Predator drones for S-400 without CAATSA.
I have no doubt that the US companies are the best in the world in terms of defense tech and executing contracts. They are the best WHEN they have a green signal from the Pentagon.
You clearly forget that we have been giving them a lot of that since the last 10-12 years, and yet we get harrowed.
My point is, there will come a point where this threesome intimacy is not going to work out in the coming 3-5 years when a lot of stuff we see in development right now will become the mainstay, reducing imports further from any external party altogether. Also 5 years down, we will be a lot closer to looking like what China looks like today in terms of economics (not quite there, that might take 15 years more after that, but closer).
While I'd expect a friendlier/more pragmatic US administration by then, we don't know who would win. Biden may win a second term or not. If the current situation continues, we are looking at more pressure. They'd rather be:
- Buy our Stryker instead of WhAP
- Buy our future transport aircraft instead of Kawasaki C-2/ IL-476 (Gajraj replacement)
- Buy our XYZ instead of your local ABC
The moment we refuse there, the pressure will increase vis-a-vis our equation with Russia, either politically or geostrategically.