SGOperative
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2021
- Messages
- 2,278
- Likes
- 6,606
AK203 which we are getting is the same as original one except the StockPlease elaborate and share your intellectual knowledge Good Sir
AK203 which we are getting is the same as original one except the StockPlease elaborate and share your intellectual knowledge Good Sir
And? What's better in AK 203 that isn't in AK 103(please talk in terms of firing mechanism, moa accuracy, target reacquisition, barrel heat withstanding, extreme condition functionality torture test, recoil control or anything that comes close to these)AK203 which we are getting is the same as original one except the Stock
More PRs, Better Muzzle BrakeAnd? What's better in AK 203 that isn't in AK 103(please talk in terms of firing mechanism, moa accuracy, target reacquisition, barrel heat withstanding, extreme condition functionality torture test, recoil control or anything that comes close to these)
"I was thinking about chopping down that good ol 50 cal AWM's barrel, removing that pesky scope and modifying entire rifle's internals to fire it in S-SA-A mode. Makes more sense seeing a craterlike hole in terrorist's body while the flying chunk falls inside neighbor's soup bowl...should make me sleep better at night"- "7.62x51mm is a bad choice compared to 7.62x39mm. Terrorist don't wear BPJs!. This round will cause over-penetration."
- "Why buying 9mm!? We already have 5.56x30mm SCHV round! Perfect for penetrating the BPJs of terrorists."
Top cover attached to receiver, giving repeatable zero on top rail. Radical innovation in AK design.Please elaborate and share your intellectual knowledge Good Sir
You missed the most crucial part of this utterly intricate and quite delicious soup of yours."I was thinking about chopping down that good ol 50 cal AWM's barrel, removing that pesky scope and modifying entire rifle's internals to fire it in S-SA-A mode. Makes more sense seeing a craterlike hole in terrorist's body while the flying chunk falls inside neighbor's soup bowl...should make me sleep better at night"
Naaa, none of these hi-fi technical jargons.And? What's better in AK 203 that isn't in AK 103(please talk in terms of firing mechanism, moa accuracy, target reacquisition, barrel heat withstanding, extreme condition functionality torture test, recoil control or anything that comes close to these)
Naaa, none of these hi-fi technical jargons.
The answer's pretty simple; cost.
In AK-103 you'll need additional kits from FAB or CAA or SSS.
Why!? I don't know, but it's exactly what army is currently doing, so I said.
And these kits will add cost.
But in case of AK-203 or to be more precise; AK-103M, you won't need such kits.
Top cover attached to receiver, giving repeatable zero on top rail. Radical innovation in AK design.
Extended dust cover, allowing operator to change mode of firing without taking gun off target.
Better handguard. Better magazine. Decent compensator/muzzle brake as well.
This AK is better than all AKs in our country, like it or not. Just adjustable stock would have been better than folding stock.
IDK if you're trying to be sarcastic, because that stock has some jerry rigged up frankenstien setup, folding stock adapter on folding stock. No extended cover either, no epeatable zero- check the button on the top plate, towards rear. traditional ak. Negates point of having rails on top.
That top cover is useless. Just putting a rail on something wont make the rail useful. Top cover will rattle in reciever, Optice will aim in new direction after every shot.View attachment 129842
View attachment 129844
So add best quality pic rail top cover worth 200$ and muzzle brake worth 50$ total 250$ i.e 19-20k for these enhancements on a TAR. I remember it being offered at 45k per piece. It still comes to 60k at max against 80+ k per piece of a 203.
Anyways...no point to discuss this as AK 203 is a reality. Mujhe maaf karo
Also, you edited post afterwards, makes people look like dumbos.And? What's better in AK 203 that isn't in AK 103(please talk in terms of firing mechanism, moa accuracy, target reacquisition, barrel heat withstanding, extreme condition functionality torture test, recoil control or anything that comes close to these)
That top cover is useless. Just putting a rail on something wont make the rail useful. Top cover will rattle in reciever, Optice will aim in new direction after every shot.
AK 203 is NEW design, thats why rail on top can have optics. Top cover is fixed to receiver on one end with rivet, on other end with rotating lever style pin. So Solid connection on both ends.
Top cover is different style. Cant comment unless I know specifics, but your covers were indeed insufficient.View attachment 129849
Oops
View attachment 129850
Imagine adjusting his 4x scope mounted on useless top rail after every shot taken...big oof
Doesn't matter, it's more or less just an AR.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | Russia to supply air defence system and small arms to Pakistan | Pakistan | 3 | |
Gun memes | General Multimedia | 83 | ||
Israeli-Indian JV to make small arms in private sector | Defence & Strategy | 15 | ||
India identifying requirement for small arms fire detection system | Indian Army | 6 |