Skirmishs at LOC, LAC & International Border

[WARREN SS]

No, even surgical strikes happened after 10 days ,so for a big response ,no way it happens in 2-3 days.

So you mean to say if Pakistan army air force or military strikes us today we will wait for ten days for strike them back ??

you mean to say Army GHQ don't have pre-battle contingencies in case War ???

 

[ezsasa]

Imran Khan turns out to be an idiot. By saying Pakistan will retaliate if we take action , he has basically confirmed that all tango attacks after our retaliation is Pakistan’s doing(officially).

 

[WARREN SS]

Imran Khan turns out to be an idiot. By saying Pakistan will retaliate if we take action , he has basically confirmed that all tango attacks after our retaliation is Pakistan’s doing(officially).

this has done with complete strategy

 

[WARREN SS]

so, did Pakistani airforce strike us?
make some sense man, war needs objectives what are the objectives? full blown war will not happen and a short limited war requires way more planning and REAL TIME INTELLIGENCE not the one you had a few months ago . You want us to go RAMBO on them.
If nothing happens in a month I will join your band wagon ,right now I can't.

this is just dumb did you know how it sounds
a country which enjoys so much over reach on Pakistan in conventional terms have no contingencies for such attacks even after Uri ,26/11' pathankot

India have no policy of asymmetric warfare against Pakistan while ISI conducted multiple small attacks on army bases post surgical strikes

Our intelligence agencies combined have budget of 3 billion $ that is almost equal to Pakistan military
and all we are able to do with this not able to create stable Policy of counter offensive

 

[Sikhbrah]

Ok, just watched the speech on PTV and listened to a Maulana making gutteral goat fucking noises for the sake of science.

- He started off by saying Pakis were not involved and what would they have to gain. They are against terrorism.
- Offered cooperation for investigation and offered to talk about terrorism without bringing Kashmir in.
- Said that India is doing it for getting a boost in elections.
- Warned India that if we attack, Pakis are guaranteed to retaliate and though he didn't mention nukes, he strongly hinted at using them eventually.

Yes but I got a feel that he was very cautious from his speech.

He explicitly mentioned where do we go after war, solves nothing - dialogue is the way forward.

 

[WARREN SS]

yes, because we also have a large islamic population ,so a large chunk of our budget goes there ,then there's no Hindus in Pakistan for asymetric warfare and neither are their Hindu countries with oil supporting us , contingency plans changes according to real time intelligence ,as it is already said pakis fortified there positions even before pulwama attack ,now they are well ,trenched , equipped and on high alert .
Contingency plan or rather I say cold start would have happened by now if it was ready ,it clearly isn't and as always NUCLEAR deterrence is the key ,we can't go full war without taking out their nukes first and for limited war ,unless we have clear objectives it will just be dick measuring contest .
I say we grab land but it comes with casaulities.
I am done thank you.

What the fuck is this hindu muslim bullshit.intelligence generated by well placed assets and We had credible intel of pulwama was already there before 7 days prior

 

[Sikhbrah]

What the fuck is this hindu muslim bullshit.intelligence generated by well placed assets and We had credible intel of pulwama was already there before 7 days prior

He has a point - Muslims in India (like the suicide bomber) provide strategic depth for Pakistan ISI to assault India but we don’t have the equivalent Hindu Sikh population in Pakistan to do the same for us.

 

[indus]

@Violent peaceful lets not make this thread another hindu- muslim battleground. Stay on track.
Jai Hind

 

[sorcerer]

After corps commander made it clear to enemies , enemy is trying to diffuse the situation

Another interesting posture is when India sent back the MBD of Saudi Arabia..saying he cant come to india from pakistan...
Crown Prince MBS Flies to Riyadh First as India Objects to Direct Arrival from Pakistan

The Crown Prince, popularly known as MBS, arrived in Islamabad on Sunday at the start of his tour of South Asia, but returned to Saudi Arabia on Monday, PTI quoted sources as saying, adding that New Delhi had reservations over his coming to India from Pakistan.



https://www.news18.com/news/india/c...m-pakistan-amid-pulwama-tensions-2040979.html

Very strong DIPLOMATIC POSTURING by India

 

[cyclops]

BREAKING: Iran says two of the people who carried out attack on Revolutionary Guards were Pakistani.

 

[cyclops]

He has a point - Muslims in India (like the suicide bomber) provide strategic depth for Pakistan ISI to assault India but we don’t have the equivalent Hindu Sikh population in Pakistan to do the same for us.

There's Balochis and Pashtuns.

We are giving these scumbag pakjabis way too much credit; deep down they are the same feudal, racist, warmongers that lost Bangladesh and care for no one but punjabis.

If we end up properly establishing ourselves in Iran and Afghanistan, we can do it again and this time it will be a start to a proper balkanization.

 

[Sikhbrah]

There's Balochis and Pashtuns.

We are giving these scumbag pakjabis way too much credit; deep down they are the same feudal, racist, warmongers that lost Bangladesh and care for no one but punjabis.

If we end up properly establishing ourselves in Iran and Afghanistan, we can do it again and this time it will be a start to a proper balkanization.

View attachment 32140

There is a difference.

While the Balochis and Pashtuns dislike Pakjabis - they would still side with another “musulman” over an Indian.

Our Muslims - given the right recipe of ideological teaching - would side with the Musulman of Pakistani over a Kafir Hindu as prescribed by their holy Quran.

Establishing ourselves in Iran and Afghanistan will be easier said than done.

 

[Immanuel]

I am confident, a vast majority of Muslims in India will always side with India.

 

[sorcerer]

BREAKING: Iran says two of the people who carried out attack on Revolutionary Guards were Pakistani.

AWWWWesome.
Taliban Khan should make another video for the Iranians...

Didnt some pig from pakistan say loooong ago that "pakistan will become a grain of wheat between India and Iran..

There it is now..

 

[Indx TechStyle]

While the Balochis and Pashtuns dislike Pakjabis - they would still side with another “musulman” over an Indian.

Who cares man? What we did in Bangladesh? We just snatched it and handed its control over to Mukti Bahini separatists. No matter what paki supporters inside Bangladesh could say.

Even if just 20% of Balochis and Pashtuns are against Pakistan, doesn't matter. We've to give them power.

In the end, its all about decisive victory. When you win undisputedly and enemy has surrendered its sovereignity, you can do anything to them you want.
Allied powers in world wars did whatever they wanted after WW1 &WW2 to Ottomans, Japanese and Germans.


It's all about winning effectively. Defeat and make them surrender, then do whatever you want.

 

[sorcerer]

Who cares man? What we did in Bangladesh? We just snatched it and handed its control over to Mukti Bahini separatists. No matter what paki supporters inside Bangladesh could say.

Even if just 20% of Balochis and Pashtuns are against Pakistan, doesn't matter. We've to give them power.

In the end, its all about decisive victory. When you win undisputedly and enemy has surrendered its sovereignity, you can do anything to them you want.
Allied powers in world wars did whatever they wanted after WW1 &WW2 to Ottomans, Japanese and Germans.


It's all about winning effectively.

Ofcourse, "terrorism" is an international menace and has to be dealt with. pakis were "terrorizing" the people of then East porkistan ..India went in and sorted it out.
This is not a war against pakistan..its a war against.."terrorism."
India has commitments to the international community..you see.

 

[Sikhbrah]

I am confident, a vast majority of Muslims in India will always side with India.

At this point, yes.

The Pakjabis were also siding India during the pre-partition era.

My grandfather used to tell me - no one in Lahore ever thought they will not be part of India.

All it takes is an increase in population and a reminder of the Quran teachings - you will watch their loyalty switch in a flip.

 

[Sikhbrah]

Who cares man? What we did in Bangladesh? We just snatched it and handed its control over to Mukti Bahini separatists. No matter what paki supporters inside Bangladesh could say.

Even if just 20% of Balochis and Pashtuns are against Pakistan, doesn't matter. We've to give them power.

In the end, its all about decisive victory. When you win undisputedly and enemy has surrendered its sovereignity, you can do anything to them you want.
Allied powers in world wars did whatever they wanted after WW1 &WW2 to Ottomans, Japanese and Germans.


It's all about winning effectively. Defeat and make them surrender, then do whatever you want.

Bangladeshis are a very different animal compared to Baluchis and Pashtuns.

No doubt - it is possible. All I am saying is it will not be as easy as them using disjointed Muslims in our society against us.

 

[cyclops]

There is a difference.

While the Balochis and Pashtuns dislike Pakjabis - they would still side with another “musulman” over an Indian.

Our Muslims - given the right recipe of ideological teaching - would side with the Musulman of Pakistani over a Kafir Hindu as prescribed by their holy Quran.

Establishing ourselves in Iran and Afghanistan will be easier said than done.

That is besides the point.

We balkanize and segregate pakistanis and majority of the job is done right their.
Get them fighting against each other and they'll have lesser energy to fuck with us.
Divide and conquer, the west has been doing it since the 1600s and have perfected this particular tactic into an art form.

If muslims were so into each other they wouldn't be fighting each other all over the world.

As for establishing ourselves in Iran and Afghanistan; imho, it is not the foreign powers but our own lack of aggressive political will that has stopped us from fully utilizing the geopolitics of the region to our advantage, we have missed ample opportunities.

 

[aghamarshana]

Porkis CFV in Nowshera Sector. IK is trying to be a 'no shit guy'. These pigs will learn it the hard way for sure.