GaudaNaresh
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2022
- Messages
- 2,990
- Likes
- 9,498
There is no propaganda from my side. WAR is made up of battles AND occupation. Winning battles and losing wars have happened many times in history - see your favourite westoid guy called Pyrrhus. LOST the war.You're drowning in some propaganda. NATO has consistently proved itself to defeat any sort of enemy with military force in a reasonable time. Occupation after the battle is a separate thing. I am talking about the war-fighting potential, not administration.
NATO has abysmal war fighting potential, since they have abysmal record in winning wars. Its just that simple.
Failure to occupy is a military failure.
Alexander administered 100% of the territory he conquered, for nearly 7 years post conquest- till he died.By the logic you use, even Alexander the Great or Zorawar Singh did not win any wars, because even though they crushed their enemies, they did not effectively administer the areas they won.
He didnt win a battle and then lose the war, with his enemies regaining control of their lands.