Where are arjun fans ?
Discussion has become one sided!!
Even though i like arjun's design seems it has a long way to go to match t-90s.
This really depends on how quickly DRDO is able to grasp newer techniques and utilize them. The 3rd gen is lost to us. We can only hope to better the Arjun in upgrades like the Leo or Abrams to get up to those levels in the next decade and build a whole new tank. Pretty much the biggest advantage we have is that no one is going for a whole new tank which could very well be the edge we need. That apart from a rather unlimited funding from our roaring economy.The fact is that Arjun is Your first MBT, Your country just need time, more data, more experience, but remember that other countries don't stand in one place, it is hard to get up to their level.
what is the point it has been discuss till death, we know what happen at the tanks trial, if Arjun was not won then Votka lobby would have shouted at the top of their lungs.Where are arjun fans ?
Discussion has become one sided!!
Even though i like arjun's design seems it has a long way to go to match t-90s.
Saya, You have to accept that arjun came on top only in accuracy and some other parameters. Overall T-90 is better than Arjun as per the discussion in last few pages. P2p has been saying this, Militarysta and damien have also confirmed that arjun is weaker.what is the point it has been discuss till death, we know what happen at the tanks trial, if Arjun was not won then Votka lobby would have shouted at the top of their lungs.
BTW those 500 Arjun tanks were order after T90 was defeated it was not out of charity for the nation. BTW earlier DGMF is out of office, his dream project FMBT (rusisan T95) was cancelled (not kept alive by private money in order to secure Indian Order).
Where is this mythical space and where is the round? The Indian Army even today, primarily relies on Israeli rounds because they offer far better performance than the Russian BM42 variants peddled to India. Heck, even Russian arms vendors at shows admit that their lack of modern APFSDS is a problem.
Rubbish. The Arjun is a heavy MBT and is overall superior to the T-90 across the board, irrespective of what a bunch of guys quoting Russian vaporware - which BTW is yet to be matured - say!Saya, You have to accept that arjun came on top only in accuracy and some other parameters. Overall T-90 is better than Arjun as per the discussion in last few pages. P2p has been saying this, Militarysta and damien have also confirmed that arjun is weaker.
Lets hope DRDO surprise us with MK-2.
The "many things" about the Arjun armor tests are because the Arjun is an Indian project and regularly tracked by parliamentary audit and national media. The T-90 is ex-import. Less is known about the tests conducted against it, because it was not developed locally & hence manufacturer conducted tests are known only to the user & supplier! BTW, its not as if the Russian side has not revealed details about the T-series armor either.It is interesting, they says many things about Arjun armor tests but T-90 tests are classified... wht they affraid of? That T-90 will have comparabale or better protection?
The Arjun is actually 3 projects rolled into one. The original, circa late 1970s was a reengineered Vijayanta, the one circa 1980s was a modernized derivative, the one finally decided on was an Abrams M1A1 equivalent with specifications picked up from both the Leopard2 A4 and Abrams M1A1. Thereafter, the Army asked for further changes, moving the tank beyond these original goal posts. The point is the Arjun is not just a tank developed yesterday as a beginners effort. It is the culmination of decades worth of engineering effort for a customer which will not accept anything but the best - as it defines it.The fact is that Arjun is Your first MBT, Your country just need time, more data, more experience, but remember that other countries don't stand in one place, it is hard to get up to their level.
So still without open to public armor tests, You statements about Arjun superiority is just pure fanboy'ism.The "many things" about the Arjun armor tests are because the Arjun is an Indian project and regularly tracked by parliamentary audit and national media. The T-90 is ex-import. Less is known about the tests conducted against it, because it was not developed locally & hence manufacturer conducted tests are known only to the user & supplier! BTW, its not as if the Russian side has not revealed details about the T-series armor either.
No such thing as heavy MBT exists, there are only MBT's, maybe You amateurs learn proper nomenclature before You start discussion. ...The Arjun is a heavy MBT
Proove it.and is overall superior to the T-90 across the board,
Really? Any proof of that? And T-90 was not highly tested before Russian Army fielded it? belive me, Russian test standards are much more hard that these of Indian Army.The Arjun in contrast is a highly tested product.
So what he says something? One officer in Poland said that 9M14 ATGM is capabale to destroy any MBT, even hitting front armor, that is absolute BS... but yeah, officer said so, so amateur will belive in anything...Go & look up the latest IA video on the Armoured Corps at NDTV and what the officer says about the Arjun!
Unless you are aware of the Arjuns armor placement, you have just been speculating here. The Leo2A4 was the basis of the original Arjun design. But India moved far ahead later in terms of armor requirements.My, favorite Forum is alive as I see - good
@Blood
8kg for sabot + rod (penetrator)
or
8kg for rod (penetrator)
It's big difference.
Becouse Ajrun Mk.I have enormous, impossible to shield, weak areas. In other tanks there is no such thing. Even old Leo2A4 have smaller and better protected weak areas.
Sorry, but you are looking at yesterdays info and projecting it to the future. The Arjun ammunition - referred to as MK1 120MM was designed to Army requirements projected sometime back & used to validate the gun ammo system. But improved variants are being worked on, and even otherwise, India has the option of using a variety of modern 120mm rounds & even license manufacturing them as it did with other programs.Germany:
[/B][/B]
USA:
India:
As You can see - Indian 120mm AFSDS have smaller L-D ratio. Rather like in DM-33 or at best variant like in M829.
Even if the pressure in the chamber is bigger performance will not be great.
Rather like in Dm-33 or M829 (470-550mm RHA for 2000m) - per analogy to other known projectiles.
It's to little to kill T-80UD "face to face"
Yes we are aware of armor placement.Unless you are aware of the Arjuns armor placement,
Yes, and the rest of world just stop their development and waited for India?But India moved far ahead later in terms of armor requirements.
Really so explain me, how You will manufacture ammunition that can't be fired from Rifled gun? Because all 120mm ammo is for smoothbore guns and British ammunition for rifled guns is 3 piece ammunition. So how You would do that? Magic?India has the option of using a variety of modern 120mm rounds & even license manufacturing them as it did with other programs.
So where are these improved variants? Oh wait, let me guess, DRDO afraid to show them?The Arjun ammunition - referred to as MK1 120MM was designed to Army requirements projected sometime back & used to validate the gun ammo system. But improved variants are being worked on,
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | Pakistan show interest in Ukraine Oplot main battle tank | Pakistan | 0 | |
T-80UD Main Battle Tank - A Pakistani Perspective | Defence Wiki | 0 | ||
W | Taiwan will purchase 108 M1A2 Abrams main battle tanks from U.S. | Land Forces | 6 | |
W | Pakistan Procuring 300 T-90 Main Battle Tanks from Russia. | Pakistan | 68 |