Shredder
Regular Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
- Messages
- 685
- Likes
- 1,857
![India Country flag](https://defenceforumindia.com/misc/flags/shiny/32/India.png)
Chup Madarchod
You're entire existence is an abuse to religion
Nigga we'll smack u back into you're mamas pussy.
![](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.406northlane.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F06%2FInspiring-and-Yet-Savage.jpg&hash=6a5a03e83f6af0e7b03487f3a4c5ff5c)
------------------------------
Chup Madarchod
You're entire existence is an abuse to religion
Nigga we'll smack u back into you're mamas pussy.
No. Just few small subtribes among them.AFAIK balochi tribes like marri, bugti have marathi lineage. Many are the descendents of the slaves captured during wars with marathas. Pashtuns are afghans... right???
https://www.geo.tv/latest/150159-soldier-two-civilians-martyred-in-indian-firing-along-loc-says-isprPakistan Army two soldiers martyred at LoC from Indian fire
https://timesofislamabad.com/pakistan-army-two-soldiers-martyred-at-loc-from-indian-fire/2017/07/19/
this website is run by a paki known for multiple fake Twitter accounts
Good cleansing...More and more porks are being halalled .... Inshallah....more Porkies Died
The incident also critically injured two soldiers and five civilians.
Indian troops targetted Army outposts and the civilian population in Nezapir, Sabzkot and Kayani sectors, added ISPR.
Soldier, two civilians martyred in Indian firing along LoC, says ISPR
I would disagree. We can capture Tibet once we cut down their supplies and destroy their transport infra, and the on-ground infra and troops can be demolished by air attacks, but the question is afterwards, what? We can't maintain Tibet, atleast not now, even if Tibet is our protectorate, we can't station our troops there and support their food and supplies on everyday basis, that is just too costly, and I am not even talking about winters.Frankly speaking Capturing Tibet is almost impossible job specially when some 2-3 lakh soldier in Tibet ...
China able to capture Tibet because India( Nehru) give up protectorate of Tibet and let Tibets defense on hand of 8000 soldier ..Chine army literally have walk in the park..and now we have 300k soldier in opposite site.
The Indo-tibet border are drawn based on highest ridge like..it's make all the slope of Himalaya within Indian border and and give whole Platue to Tibet ... Those media moron and others who comparing India and Chinas border infrastructure difference ,ignore many thing include this fact that China have almost flat land in otherside to build road while India have to cut Goddes Himalaya
We have only hope to liberate Tibetan from Han/CCP control is to manipulating Tibetan in "Inner Tibet" large no. of Tibetan live in Yunna, Sichuan , gansu etc , CCP not merge these Tibetan dominated area with Tibetan autonomous area fearing greter Tibetan nationalism..but it's fact that the Tibetan themselves in these area hate Han, 1911 probably when Tibet first proclaimed independence Tibetan massacre Han in those area and CCP took revenge of it in 50s ..ifour intelligence able to mobile more than 3 crore of tibetan live in Inner Tibet then it would be very good job specially if we at the same time fuel Uygur muslims to cretae Eastern Turkestan .
We need to pass Karakoram then Karatagh Valley , then Kulnun after that Taklaman then we get extended Gobi ....after that we might get Hotan ...It's seems capturing Lasa is easier than that
Tibet has their own food source not depending on mainland ChinaI would disagree. We can capture Tibet once we cut down their supplies and destroy their transport infra, and the on-ground infra and troops can be demolished by air attacks, but the question is afterwards, what? We can't maintain Tibet, atleast not now, even if Tibet is our protectorate, we can't station our troops there and support their food and supplies on everyday basis, that is just too costly, and I am not even talking about winters.
I don't think we can hold the entire Xinjiang as it is 1/5 of our country size just parts of it that have proximity to Kashmir is enough.But that is more beneficial for us..... That area has lots of petroleum and we will become neighbors of Afghanistan, tazakistaan , Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, mamgolia and Russia......and yes goodbye to CPEC.
View attachment 17934
Wrong assumption. They can feed local populace perhaps, but not scores of Military, thus PLA is getting food imported from the mainland.Tibet has their own food source not depending on mainland China
True. The Hingulambika Devi temple is in Balochistan. Hingulambika Devi is deity of Bhawsar kshatriya community, majority living in Maharashtra.AFAIK balochi tribes like marri, bugti have marathi lineage. Many are the descendents of the slaves captured during wars with marathas. Pashtuns are afghans... right???
This is the first time that i find myself in agreement with yadav srhttp://www.ndtv.com/india-news/chin...elp-from-pak-says-mulayam-singh-yadav-1726690
To Attack India, China Readies Nuclear Weapons In Pak: Mulayam Yadav
Depends. All people in South Asia are mixes of certain ancestry to a differing extent. Afghan and Pak Pashtuns as well as Baloch are almost identical to certain Northern Indian tribes like Jatts and Kashmiris basically having 3-4% more Caucasian DNA on average at the cost of ONGE DNA. Rest is pretty identical. So they are like 95% similar..If I'm not wrong only the Baloch and Pasthuns have Iranian ancestry right?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Skirmishs at LOC, LAC & International Border | Indian Army | 13524 | |
H | OSINT compilation thread | Knowledge Repository | 54 | |
![]() |
LOC, LAC & IB warfare | Indian Army | 2005 | |
![]() |
LOC, LAC & IB skirmishs | Indian Army | 1958 |