- Joined
- Dec 24, 2015
- Messages
- 6,510
- Likes
- 7,217
Mig21? It's a joke.HAL makes avionics, engines, helicopters, trainers, Do228, Hawk-i, MiG21 & services all the planes and aircrafts in indian inventory
Mig21? It's a joke.HAL makes avionics, engines, helicopters, trainers, Do228, Hawk-i, MiG21 & services all the planes and aircrafts in indian inventory
We already were speaking of Su30 and hence I did not repeat. MiG21 was made in 1970s-80 and after 2010, Su30 is made. MiG21 is being serviced and overhauled when needed in HAL will it retires. miG21 engine was also made by HAL and even today some of the engine spare parts are made in HAL.Mig21? It's a joke.
A very good news for Rafale !!!
@Sancho @StealthFlanker @smestarz : sorry for you....
With the S400 purchase, and the risk of US sanction, combined to average products (F16, SH18) means that the sole real opponent is EF. And EF don't give any edge, technically or diplomatically.
Su35, ordered by China, and because it is a russian product is out. Just usefull to bargain with west suppliers.
Rafale is in the last track to win.
http://idrw.org/mmrca-2-0-trials-will-be-short-iaf-chief/
A very good news for Rafale !!!
@Sancho @StealthFlanker @smestarz : sorry for you....
With the S400 purchase, and the risk of US sanction, combined to average products (F16, SH18) means that the sole real opponent is EF. And EF don't give any edge, technically or diplomatically.
Su35, ordered by China, and because it is a russian product is out. Just usefull to bargain with west suppliers.
Rafale is in the last track to win.
http://idrw.org/mmrca-2-0-trials-will-be-short-iaf-chief/
India does not trust USA or UK with high end items. EFT is made by UK primarily and other countries are just bodu shops. USA and UK does not agree to give any technology transfers to India. So, EFT was always ruled out except for creeps like @Sancho
The real competition is between Russian MiG35 and Rafale. Russia is willing to give full ToT like it gave for Su30. SO, don't look at fake competitions and laugh at yourself
RCS of rafale is less than 0.1m2 from front sideRCS of rafale is 1m^2. It has lower RCS due to SPECTRA jammer but that jammer can be in any plane.
About Rafale deal, India is getting offsets of around $2 billion which is important for India. Many of this is going into DRDO itself which means it is technology transfer. In addition, India is getting some Jaguars, Mirage2000 etc.
Parrikar had made it clear that India does not need Rafale but can make do with Su30. So, it is clear that the utility of Rafale was in the offsets, not the plane itself
Dassault buit up to date fighters (according to Rand corp. Dassault is the sole to be on par with US ! ), built business jets, Has studied the Hermes shuttle, has studied and built the first deterrence missile for Israel (see below), has studied and built the Mercure liner, A subsidiary od Dassault, called electronic Marcel Dassault, then electronic Serge Dassaut and now merge with Thales studied and produced radars for fighters and missilesDassault does very little job on its own. HAL is like Dasault, Safran and Thales combined together
Indian government and IAF don't want a russian product : the Su30 fllet is wide, there is disponibility problem, the russian planes are affordable but the support and spares parts cost a lot, they want a west plane so as to challenge the russian one and not put all the eggs in the same basket.India does not trust USA or UK with high end items. EFT is made by UK primarily and other countries are just bodu shops. USA and UK does not agree to give any technology transfers to India. So, EFT was always ruled out except for creeps like @Sancho
The real competition is between Russian MiG35 and Rafale. Russia is willing to give full ToT like it gave for Su30. SO, don't look at fake competitions and laugh at yourself
No.Do add Su-35 that might be in the race too
The MMRCA2 document, I have read it carrefully, is strangely perfectly fitted to just one plane.The news does not say anything about Rafale
Now, I do feel sorry for you dear, for the following reasons
a) USA as of now have not sanctioned India, and I doubt they would. We have not gone and told USA ".. we dont give rats @$$ about your sanctions and we are going in .. " We rather tried to explain to USA have critical S-400 deal is for India and we thought we should get a waiver. Also to note is that US Dep official has said "we do not sanction allies " Does that tell anything to you?
Do read this https://www.livemint.com/Politics/U...-sanctions-not-at-the-expense-of-damagin.html
Its in English and maybe you do not fully understand it,,
So, the two players for MMRCA are still there, dream on BP.
b) With all the ruckus about the Rafale deal in public domain about quid pro quo for Anil Ambani (where he gets benefit for India signing deal with France for Rafale) That seems would stay for sometime. Opposition parties have requested CAG and CVC to look into it, So where would that put Dassault?
Sanctions or not, we shall come to know within a week, but whether to do more business with Dassault would (if CAG and CVC get involved) then might take years to get clarity.
Also India signed a deal with Russia that shows that Indo Russia relations are still strong, and that might put Su-35 or maybe an improve version of it with say an AESA version could be available for MRCA.
Also remember, MiG-35 is very capable plane and best value for money among the compeitors Also india uses MiG-299 UPG which has commonality.
So in a way, all this is not really pro Rafale development but development that does not favour Rafale..
Also though IAF would want a plane,, they give their recommendations, but its upto the govt to purchase the plane... IAF is the user, not the decision maker in fact.
The MMRCA deal has the intention of getting rafsle itself. India and France had a strategic deal and the 36 was only first installment. The deal is much more deeper than merely getting some Rafale jets. Why else would India get $1.5 billion dollars offset for DRDO?The MMRCA2 document, I have read it carrefully, is strangely perfectly fitted to just one plane.
It's name starts with "RAF" and ends with 'ALE"
1) I agree for Apache, P8I, drones, MH60. less clear for NASAM.The US won't sanction the S-400 deal, keep dreaming folks, this deal has been done clearly after clarifications with US. COMSACA signing, NASAMs cleared for purchase, 6 more Apaches cleared with more 33 to be ordered later, 12 more P-8Is, 22 Guardians cleared for purchase (armed versions also available), 24 MH-60s.
By the end of 2025, the deal values of most deals with US will be a lot more than any other country. As for MMRCA 2.0, SH Block 3 is a formidable contender specially since they have tied up with HAL for local assembly with TOT (with MKI production slowly coming to an end, there is a lot of capacity becoming available in the timeline)
RCS of rafale is less than 0.1m2 from front side
Dassault buit up to date fighters (according to Rand corp. Dassault is the sole to be on par with US ! ), built business jets, Has studied the Hermes shuttle, has studied and built the first deterrence missile for Israel (see below), has studied and built the Mercure liner, A subsidiary od Dassault, called electronic Marcel Dassault, then electronic Serge Dassaut and now merge with Thales studied and produced radars for fighters and missiles
HAL ? they are do-it-yourselfers on Sunday
https://www.dassault-aviation.com/fr/passion/avions/dassault-militaires/md-620-jericho/
Indian government and IAF don't want a russian product : the Su30 fllet is wide, there is disponibility problem, the russian planes are affordable but the support and spares parts cost a lot, they want a west plane so as to challenge the russian one and not put all the eggs in the same basket.
Mig35 don't have an operationnal AESA radar so far (as Su35), and is too new.
IAF want a west mature up to date medium fighter.
Mig and Su will just be used to bargain the west OEM.
1) I agree for Apache, P8I, drones, MH60. less clear for NASAM.
2) This is why SH3 will not be chosen. Because SH3 is not so impressive, and because the US has already been well served by 1).
Add that Indian govt want to create a new private aerospace champion to move the a** of HAL. They are tired with lazy HAL. HAL will be "punished" through MMRCA2.
India takes the best of all its old and faithfull or newbie and opportunistic suppliers : S400 from Russia, Rafale from France, and some good products from USA (not all the best, but all very good stuff)
The MMRCA deal has the intention of getting rafsle itself. India and France had a strategic deal and the 36 was only first installment. The deal is much more deeper than merely getting some Rafale jets. Why else would India get $1.5 billion dollars offset for DRDO?
The MMRCA2 document, I have read it carrefully, is strangely perfectly fitted to just one plane.
It's name starts with "RAF" and ends with 'ALE"
No.
Far too heavy, already sold to China, too near a Su30, and india don't want a russian product this time.
BJP has the guts and support of people to do that. BJP stands for hindutva and strong behavior of BJP can make people go with it. BIP is playing soft for now but not because of weakness.Would BJP govt risk siding with Rafale the political hot potato? They would have to wait for few years till CAG and CVC will give theirreport, by that time the MMRCA would be over
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rafale in Croatian Air Force | Military Aviation | 10 | ||
W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 | |
Indian Navy more likely to select F 18 than rafales | Indian Navy | 164 | ||
Greek Rafale vs Turkish EF 2000 Who has the Technolocal Edge | Military Aviation | 5 |