Raj Malhotra
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2009
- Messages
- 1,514
- Likes
- 3,382
I am proud of Rafale it is fully 5 legged Cheetah. The fifth leg is used to scratch the right back.
The Typhoons lack of air to ground capacity. only comming.... but postponed year after year....I think Saudi Typhoons will be slightly more advance than Rafales in Asia... I don't know if Indian F3 Rafales are equally good to Saudi Typhoons though
I'm not an expert. Just a guy reading and listening things about fighters until 30+ years (I'm 50)I don't know... may be experts like Bon Plan or Tactical Frog can explain here
I agree 200% with you !Yes not only we can afford 2 different MRCA, it will also make our air force look like a zoo... F-16 and F-18 are out of question and Gripen too will not be selected due to American engine... Okay to buy US choppers, transport planes, artillery but fighter jet is front line offensive system and for that matter I think India will trust France more than US... Its certainly going to be additional Rafales for MII...
ouhhhh..... you are off topic my friend.How flares and chaffs gone a work aganist radar guided missiles and self homing missiles?
Meteor shall be a game changer as for its superior no escape zone and best in class tail chase, thanks to the ramjet.The Typhoons lack of air to ground capacity. only comming.... but postponed year after year....
In Dog fight Rafale usually win against EF.
In Beyond visual range, I don't know. Maybe EF better today. Only Maybe, because Rafale has now an AESA radar, EF not. Biut AMRAAM has a longer range than Mica.... so ????
But the second plane in the world to receive operationaly the Meteor will be Rafale (after Gripen, but before EF).
flares are againt IR missiles, chaffs against radar and radar missiles and there are also the new active espendable decoys as Finmeccanica BriteCloud also againt guided radar missiles that can be fired from standard chaff dispensers (Grippen and RAF Tornado/Typhoon started using them).How flares and chaffs gone a work aganist radar guided missiles and self homing missiles?
The Typhoons lack of air to ground capacity. only comming.... but postponed year after year....
In Dog fight Rafale usually win against EF.
In Beyond visual range, I don't know. Maybe EF better today. Only Maybe, because Rafale has now an AESA radar, EF not. Biut AMRAAM has a longer range than Mica.... so ????
But the second plane in the world to receive operationaly the Meteor will be Rafale (after Gripen, but before EF).
Brimstone is not yet integrated. And where is stormshadow? And anti ship missile, or a nuclear missile? Right now, EFT carries as many weapons as much as LCA which is still waiting for its FOC.
uff... too few... only 56 paveway IV released over the head of ISIS tugs from this thypoon.
Siria/Iraq: Jan-March 2016: Typhoons dropped 252 Paveway IV. Tornados GR4 dropped 147 Paveway IV and fired 42 Brimstone. Reaper: 47 Hellfire and 5 GBU-12.
The only ground attack with the onboard cannon was by a Thypoon that fired 26 rounds.
But overall the Cheese Eater is right ... the EF-2000 substantially lack of air-to-ground capabilities, but it is a political and technical decision: the UK has only integrated the weapons that produces: Paveway IV and Brimstone, so it can continue to suck money from Saudi Arabia & allies, Germany is not much interested in bombing anyone and in any case still has 100 (150) Tornados for that, Italy same as Germany and has about 60 Tornados and 55 AMX for that and the future for bombing are cover by F-35s.
It's not totally true.
uff... too few... only 56 paveway IV released over the head of ISIS tugs from this thypoon.
Siria/Iraq: Jan-March 2016: Typhoons dropped 252 Paveway IV. Tornados GR4 dropped 147 Paveway IV and fired 42 Brimstone. Reaper: 47 Hellfire and 5 GBU-12.
The only ground attack with the onboard cannon was by a Thypoon that fired 26 rounds.
But overall the Cheese Eater is right ... the EF-2000 substantially lack of air-to-ground capabilities, but it is a political and technical decision: the UK has only integrated the weapons that produces: Paveway IV and Brimstone, so it can continue to suck money from Saudi Arabia & allies, Germany is not much interested in bombing anyone and in any case still has 100 (150) Tornados for that, Italy same as Germany and has about 60 Tornados and 55 AMX for that and the future for bombing are cover by F-35s.
once again it's not totally true.
Technically you're right on the integration of the Brimstone, but unofficially they are already integrated at 100%. Then it makes little sense to hit with a little missile with a warhead of only 10 kg (but it costs more than $ 200,000) targets that are worth $ 5,000-10,000 at most.
The about 50 Brimstone launched are just a commercial ads.
The StormShadow?? bah... the few launched in Libya by the British (5?) had a ridiculous low hit percentage, but probable was a Brits fault (moreover the Brits have 900 of them... 900 lemons probable), the French have reduced the stock only to 100 from the original 500 (not sure if was 400 or 500), we Italians have launched in Libya 33 StormShadow: 32 full hit, 1 missing, but since the Italian MoD said that in Libya our Tornados have made their deepest penetration into hostile territory, probably italians stormshadows were used to hit installations and ammunition depots in the desert or not very populated areas, so easy targets (and no reintegration of used missiles)... Dont seems that the main users are very satisfied with the missile.
In any case the range of the stormshadow is too short with the modern Air Defences... in Kossovo war agaist a little nation with a outdated airdefence, NATO warplanes fired 700 HARM missiles (350 from USA F-16 CJ, 235 from German Tornados ECR and 115 from Italian Tornados ECR) to keep down enemy AD... against a real enemy the stormshadows are useless.
You are right BON PLAN, one should also not forget that Rafale can do naval rolls too which Typhoons cannot... and once Meteor is operational both will have equal BVR capacity... so overall one can say that Rafale is better than Typhoons because of the variety of task, strike, naval operations it can perform.The Typhoons lack of air to ground capacity. only comming.... but postponed year after year....
In Dog fight Rafale usually win against EF.
In Beyond visual range, I don't know. Maybe EF better today. Only Maybe, because Rafale has now an AESA radar, EF not. Biut AMRAAM has a longer range than Mica.... so ????
But the second plane in the world to receive operationaly the Meteor will be Rafale (after Gripen, but before EF).
Yes, EF primary actual air to air missile is the US AMRAAM AIM120.You are right BON PLAN, one should also not forget that Rafale can do naval rolls too which Typhoons cannot... and once Meteor is operational both will have equal BVR capacity... so overall one can say that Rafale is better than Typhoons because of the variety of task, strike, naval operations it can perform.
AMARAAM means are Typhoons aremed with AIM 120?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rafale in Croatian Air Force | Military Aviation | 10 | ||
W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 | |
Indian Navy more likely to select F 18 than rafales | Indian Navy | 164 | ||
Greek Rafale vs Turkish EF 2000 Who has the Technolocal Edge | Military Aviation | 5 |