smestarz
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
- Messages
- 1,929
- Likes
- 1,056
Oh stupid froggie, Commonality is a very nice term you use but for a very stupid reason,
I mean because we have 48 planes and in order to have that commonality we buy 36 planes at exorbitant price? What is the use of the commonality? Rafale as such was not going to replace Mirage 2000 thus, buying Rafale which is already too expensive, and we have to buy exorbitantly priced weapons and we have to also build air conditioned hangars for them, No real advantage
To upgrade a late 3rd gen plane and push it as 4th Gen plane and upgrading it as such, and then to buy a 4th Gen plane because it has commonlity with a 3rd gen plane is stupidity.
But on other hand, Su-35 makes sense due to commonality, India already uses 250+ Su-30 MKI hence the advantage of commonlity is better., further, we make most parts and so not an issue for spares at all.
Tejas actually makes best sense, it would be inducted in far bigger numbers than Mirage 2000 or Rafale or even the combined numbers. IT is designed in India and much of its parts are indian made so there should be no issues of spares of maintenance
As far as the Rafale Saga goes, rather than invest in buying a 4th Gen plane that is being marketed as 4.5th Gen plane or even 5th gen plane, it is better to go for a truly 5th Gen plane, It has all the technological goodies that France/Dasssault cannot provide or not even capable of. If IAF is indeed looking at the future then its PAKFA/FGFA and not Rafale. Rafale is thing of past which maybe only Arab countries are comfortable to use.
I mean because we have 48 planes and in order to have that commonality we buy 36 planes at exorbitant price? What is the use of the commonality? Rafale as such was not going to replace Mirage 2000 thus, buying Rafale which is already too expensive, and we have to buy exorbitantly priced weapons and we have to also build air conditioned hangars for them, No real advantage
To upgrade a late 3rd gen plane and push it as 4th Gen plane and upgrading it as such, and then to buy a 4th Gen plane because it has commonlity with a 3rd gen plane is stupidity.
But on other hand, Su-35 makes sense due to commonality, India already uses 250+ Su-30 MKI hence the advantage of commonlity is better., further, we make most parts and so not an issue for spares at all.
Tejas actually makes best sense, it would be inducted in far bigger numbers than Mirage 2000 or Rafale or even the combined numbers. IT is designed in India and much of its parts are indian made so there should be no issues of spares of maintenance
As far as the Rafale Saga goes, rather than invest in buying a 4th Gen plane that is being marketed as 4.5th Gen plane or even 5th gen plane, it is better to go for a truly 5th Gen plane, It has all the technological goodies that France/Dasssault cannot provide or not even capable of. If IAF is indeed looking at the future then its PAKFA/FGFA and not Rafale. Rafale is thing of past which maybe only Arab countries are comfortable to use.
Why pathetic ? Mirage 2000 and Rafale have good commonality regarding weapons. And I am not sure that anyone wants to laugh at this idea given the money IAF invested in Mirage 2000 upgrade.