You should go home and lick your wounds son, The F-35 is just not gonna fly Indian colours. Its probably not gonna fly American colours either if your Air Force has its way.says the idiot who comes into my comments 9 out 10 times to troll with moronic replies.
says that guy who follows every post I make and makes idiotic snide comments. heh. How stupid do you insist on looking by claiming stuff like you did about ranges? You came in to insult me and the American bird but you insulted India in return. genius! ...not.
"Oh we Indians cant use F35 to attack China across our border because of its combat radius , while you americans can come all over from your neck of woods and attack them anywhere with it."- whack that track!
Russia is no longer able to offer hi-tech solutions for India's security needs. The US/UK has history of sanctions so the only other option is France. We will see France grow to India's #1 supplier.French got mirage deal, MICA deal and now even MMRCA. what the hell. it seems after russia it's french time. I though GoI wanted to get better diplomatic leverage by signing deal with four consortium countries.
The Rafale will eventually equip six squadrons of the IAF, each authorised 21 fighters. It is a delta-wing fighter with canards, which make it highly manoeuvrable and also allow it to land at speeds as low as 200 kmph. This makes it suitable for aircraft carrier operations, a key advantage over the Typhoon.
The fighter needs just 1,300-1,400 feet of runway to get airborne, an advantage in operating from air bases close to the border. Two Snecma M88 engines power the Rafale, allowing it to "supercruise" or fly at supersonic speeds without using afterburners. A key system is the Thales Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, which is still under development. The Indian contract demands transfer of technology for the AESA radar.
The order of 126 Rafales caters only to the IAF's requirement. The Indian Navy, too, has expressed interest in the Rafale (amongst several other fighters) for its aircraft carrier fleet. While the INS Vikramaditya (formerly, the Russian Gorshkov) will deploy MiG-29K fighters, the under-construction Indigenous Aircraft Carrier, with another vessel to follow, will also require carrier-borne fighters. A naval version of the indigenous Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) is close to flying. However, there is likely to be an additional requirement for heavy fighters like the Rafale for the naval fleet. Experts have forecast India would eventually acquire about 200 medium multi-role combat aircraft.
The IAF's evaluation and selection processes have won widespread acclaim from aviation watchers worldwide.
Those were indeed harsh comments. If ever conventional war were to occur between Russia and US, i would put my money on US. You are right f35 is a dumb bird what makes you think US is going to use that dumb bird. They have drones, lasers and plenty of money to develop secret projects after the collapse of USSR who knew f117 was a bird until Desert Storm??You should go home and lick your wounds son, The F-35 is just not gonna fly Indian colours. Its probably not gonna fly American colours either if your Air Force has its way.
The fact is, if the SFC wants planes, they will want it for one purpose only - To deliver nuclear weapons or Massive Oranance Bombs - In either case it is stupid to send those weapons on an F35 accompanied by refuelling aircraft. They will simply get shot out of the sky before it can reach its targets. That it why there is a specific type of aircraft for such purposes - They are called Bombers. If the SFC is going to procure a delivery mechanism, it will be bombers not a toy like the F 35 that can hardly reach its targets.
You can cuss and swear as much as you want, ultimately the American planes just did not make the cut. The Hornet was outdated and the F 35 is still not even flight worthy. There was never a thing as American Air Dominance. Russian planes were the big dogs always until avionics and subsystems started playing a big role. Even with that said the raptor has never been tested in combat so your superiority is still on paper and once the FGFA is out, there goes your superiority. The F 35 wont stand a chance, the FGFA will run circles round it and your fat bird wont know wtf is happening. Have fun selling it to your 'allies'
You can kiss NATO air dominance goodbye if the F 35 is ever inducted in numbers. But the USAF is not as stupid as you. So lets see what plane takes the F 35's place in the next 10 years.
The contract was lost despite Government claims that the UK's £1billion aid package to India would help secure the order.
International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell said in December that Britain's controversial foreign aid programme was partly designed to win the bid. Britain is sending £280million to India for each of the next four years, even though the country has more billionaires than Britain and has its own space programme.
The aid package is 15 times larger than the £18million France sent to India in 2009.
Asked to justify Indian aid last year, Mr Mitchell said: 'It's a very important relationship. The focus is also about seeking to sell Typhoon.'
Last night Tory MP Peter Bone questioned the purpose of sending British aid to India at a time when cuts are being made at home. 'It just goes to show that it's a myth that by Britain becoming an aid superpower and doling billions of pounds out to countries like this exerts any influence whatsoever on the decisions made by those governments when purchasing equipment.
'We need to slash the international development money and invest the billions saved to help hard-pressed British families.'
A spokesman for UK Trade and Investments, the branch of the Government that promotes trade deals overseas, said: 'This does not rule out Typhoon for India.
'Today's decision is about who the Indians have assessed as making the lowest bid and therefore asked to enter into further negotiations.
'But the Indians have not yet awarded the contract. We continue to believe Eurofighter Typhoon provides the best capability today and into the future.'
well your govt did not get that memo doc.
I never knew we were partners with china strategically. we may have chosen to ignore them or cajole them on occasion, but till last couple of decades we did not think much about china. and that too not in a postive way over the last two decades.
Btw Doc,regarding holding us to a standard?. Russians, whose GDP you about to surpass- did they always treat their partners well? atleast we did not fvuck up any NATO partners like russians did to some of their old soviet bloc amigos. So how you do figure us treating pakistan that was always a " cost " , a " beggar" to us- equates to how we will treat India.
Personally, I think at this high end level the Eurofighter, Rafale were both evenly matched
The main point seems that the fRench fighters were 5-6 million cheaper or about half a billion dollars cheaper in the overall deal.
The deal itself was suppose to be a strategic deal so in this sense, buying the American jets or the Eurofighter consortium jets would have been better because we would have improved our strategic leverage with either the US or four other European countries rather than just France. And we will be the only buyers of this fighter in the world as well.
Ofcourse, there might be some sweetners like more tech transfer provided by the French than other countries which may have made the deal more attractive. But from a strategic leverage point of view, a deal with the US or the Euro fighter would have been better.
It will take another four to five months for the contract to be inked after the final round of commercial negotiations between the defence ministry and French aviation major Dassault, and the requisite final nod from the Cabinet Committee on Security.
I feel HAL will act as final assembler, with lot of things coming from private industries, hence this time line. Looks realistic"The first MMRCA built in HAL should roll out in 2017-18. Thereafter, HAL will deliver six jets per year, which will go up to 20 per year later. HAL will achieve 85% technology absorption by the end," said a source.
Both MoD and IAF are confident there are "enough safeguards'' built into the project, which includes "performance-based logistics'', to ensure India "gets the best machine, spares and product support".
This is utter rubbish , India govt has no such concerns. There are weapons packages that being brought directly and indirectly from the US. The size and scope of military cooperation and purchasing is growing . The intel sharing has been growing. Can you guys point me out to single concern in this regard espoused by your Def sec or PM?
while you are at it- show me a link to back up your claim about apache being a concern buy due to sanctions.
Indian establishment firmly believes that USA will never forsake Pakistan for India, ergo we can never expect USA to be on our side.This is utter rubbish , India govt has no such concerns. There are weapons packages that being brought directly and indirectly from the US. The size and scope of military cooperation and purchasing is growing . The intel sharing has been growing. Can you guys point me out to single concern in this regard espoused by your Def sec or PM?
while you are at it- show me a link to back up your claim about apache being a concern buy due to sanctions.
Absolutely, this deal wasn't about IAF getting crafts, it had all to do with India getting leverage.Personally, I think at this high end level the Eurofighter, Rafale were both evenly matched
The main point seems that the fRench fighters were 5-6 million cheaper or about half a billion dollars cheaper in the overall deal.
The deal itself was suppose to be a strategic deal so in this sense, buying the American jets or the Eurofighter consortium jets would have been better because we would have improved our strategic leverage with either the US or four other European countries rather than just France. And we will be the only buyers of this fighter in the world as well.
Ofcourse, there might be some sweetners like more tech transfer provided by the French than other countries which may have made the deal more attractive. But from a strategic leverage point of view, a deal with the US or the Euro fighter would have been better.
Pak-fa hello ?Russia is no longer able to offer hi-tech solutions for India's security needs. The US/UK has history of sanctions so the only other option is France. We will see France grow to India's #1 supplier.
Interesting French are advancing their Neuron UCAV program I wonder if some side deals may come from the Rafele victory?Of course. That's why the word modest was used in my post. We will get to it eventually. Once AMCA is made, we will obviously have to look at bigger options. I am guessing ADE may make an AMCA class UCAV while ADA may progress to a heavy UCAV in the class of MKI and PAKFA. Perhaps even a strategic bomber between the two.
U-216 subs??Indian establishment firmly believes that USA will never forsake Pakistan for India, ergo we can never expect USA to be on our side.
Absolutely, this deal wasn't about IAF getting crafts, it had all to do with India getting leverage.
However, France is in a desperate situation probably they gave us an offer that we couldn't refuse.
With Russia we always have Pak-fa, with Israel missiles, and a range of products from US.
But now how do we placate ze germans ?
already getting french subs.U-216 subs??
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rafale in Croatian Air Force | Military Aviation | 10 | ||
W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 | |
Indian Navy more likely to select F 18 than rafales | Indian Navy | 164 | ||
Greek Rafale vs Turkish EF 2000 Who has the Technolocal Edge | Military Aviation | 5 |