They can all match it if needed. What's more important is a 360 degree LWS and MAWS capability.
Existing MAWS and LWS already handle most of what DAS does. The Malaysia MKM is already equipped with 360 deg capability.
This is on the Su-35.
This is on the Su-30MKM.
Both aircraft have 10 such sensors covering roughly 360 degrees depending on function. Rafale is no different.
DAS is simply old stuff packaged into new. Similar systems will be developed if there is a need for it. The only thing extra DAS does is provide a 360 degree video to the pilot, which only helps in dog fights. MAWS and LWS provide an electronic picture only. But this only helps slightly negate the agility disadvantage of the F-35 in comparison to Rafale's excellent agility.
We don't know that, but the technology exists on both aircraft through the IRST sensors. Ground based IRSTs have been used for detecting and tracking missiles from hundreds of Kms away. This is not something that is foreign to either MKI or Rafale.
One major Rafale advantage is that it is nuke ready. F-35 is not. So, we cannot use the F-35 to launch nukes. This is of far higher operational significance to the IAF than the F-35's missile detection, which is something that most probably already exists on Rafale as well, just not advertised.
And it is impossible for the F-35 to detect a missile during launch at max range because there is such a thing called Line Of Sight.
Both MKI and Rafale are required to detect and track cruise missiles, so tracking ballistic missiles isn't any different. In terms of elevation, MKI and Rafale have a much better chance for detection due to the location of the IRST sensors while F-35's sensors are located below the cockpit.
That was for the RBE-2 PESA. AESA came much later and is better than the APG-80. In the world of AESAs, APG-80 is actually obsolete. RBE-2AA is a generation ahead in comparison. In 2002, Rafale was nowhere near ready, quite like Typhoon is today.