Yes I don't dispute that.But we should not defer to Rafale as the one and only solution for us.Which 5th gen ready made platforms is available to us. We just can't keep waiting as technology continues to improve. Its like waiting for a technologically advanced phone. At this moment FGFA and AMCA both are in drawing board and we don't know a thing about there capabilities.
There is more than one way to skin a goose.
We should look at other options available to us at the very least and use it to get the best deal for us.
I don't like the price of rafale compared to other fighters.
Since I am not privy to all the technical details of the contract regarding TOT, I can only hope the sky-high price is due us getting a lot of TOT rather than us getting ripped off yet again.
We manged to deter both PAF and PLAAF even when we had technologically inferior aircrafts to them.No we don't have superiority over PAF. That is a false belief. PAF/PA has to defend a small area. They just have 2 population core areas one near Karachi and other near Lahore and that is what they need to defend. Their ground based AD is very much concentrated. F-16s are very capable planes and JF-17 can hold on their own for some time.
On the other hand we have to defend a large area with population spread across the country. Our Air Defense has gaps and also we need to look out for PLAAF. Currently the situation is not against us but also not in our favor.
Mig-29 was first Indian aircraft that was better than its PAF counterpart (F16)
With MKI inducted, the balance of power has definitively shifted in IAF's favour for now.
Are you denying all this ?
Regarding Lahore and Karachi, cold start doctrine needs us to establish air superiority on a strip of land about 40kms wide on Pak borders with 3-4 separate thrusts in Thar to separate Northern Pakistan from South.
In case of a war, our target will be Bahawalpur, not Lahore or Karachi
Its not in our doctrine to attack Pakistani cities.This doctrine was made considering the capabilities and advantages of MKI
Same way PAF is primed for defense of its air zone, its not oriented to offensive operations over India.
Anyways Rafale,if bought will not be used as interceptor so the point is moot anyways
You are just repeating what I said.With Rafale we do get significant amount of technological advantage. Don't compare MKI to Rafale!!! Rafale does enjoy edge over MKI. Don't even compare Tejas or MiG 29 with Rafale.
Russian ambassador himself stated that India wanted Rafale/Eurofighter for MMRCA because we wanted technologies that Rafale being a small multi role fighter could bring and MKI being a large air dominance fighter could not give.
Cheers
Last edited: