Regardless, FGFA is an air superiority design with focus on supersonic maneuverability while Rafale is a ground attack design with more focus on low speed capability at lower altitudes. Apples and oranges. It was nice if Rafale was a stealth bird, but it is not and there is no other immediate replacement.
Future versions of AMCA or a whole new project will replace start replacing Rafale in the future. As long as Rafale's avionics keeps up with the needs, we will have lesser issues.
Welcome to the 21st century. You need that level of investment to keep your country's military relevant.
That's going to be part of a "huge" F-INSAS deal IA will sign with DRDO and other private and foreign companies. It may end up being as big as the FGFA contract. The program will be a long one spanning this decade and most of the next one too.
Already done and another 1500 Crores was added to manufacture LCAs. LCA Mk2 funding of over $1 Billion already sanctioned.
HAL never asked for a $2 Billion request from govt on AMCA. AMCA is currently an ADA project. So DRDO needs that amount sanctioned. Currently AMCA R&D is on hold, once LCA delivers AMCA will happen. So we will need to wait. ADA cannot spare resources on two major projects at once.
The airframe is old, but the aircraft as a whole is still relevant.
Not enough.
China still beats us in the number of platforms. They have nine types vs our six types and double our numbers for each type. So we are going to need something that gives more capability that offsets their numbers advantage. That's where Rafale comes in.
We need to replace around 600 aircraft between 2015 and 2030 and still maintain squadron numbers. It is not possible with FGFA alone. While FGFA is a decade away, AMCA is still 2 decades away. MKI production is coming to an end, so we will need aircraft inductions during the time before FGFA production starts. That's where Rafale fits in.