halloweene
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2012
- Messages
- 546
- Likes
- 230
AESA Rafale will be present end of June in NATO Tiger meet exercises. Close watch!
Sir You probably have no idea on indian Salins,,,, they are way far dangerous ,,, people who has power in our country (Talking about politicians) they dont have supreme power still they are so much corrupt,,, just imagine if any one of them had supreme power what would he do????India needs a Stalin. That is the only solution.
this deal never be canceled, India needs good ToT and only deal of this magnitude can provide decent ToT, nobody is going to provideThings are going fine...We are talking about billions! Companies are careful...
So cancel Rafale and develop AMCA instead :thumb:Post Edited
.[/COLOR]
Only if the timelines were the same.So cancel Rafale and develop AMCA instead :thumb:
Please !so what in the Jaguar cockpit indicates to the pilot that he is airborne? Is it audio, a glareshield light, a HUD indicator..?
As if it not already is. Anyway, when is M-MRCA coming?Only if the timelines were the same.
never mindhehe wanted to post that
Rafale - 2015-16.As if it not already is. Anyway, when is M-MRCA coming?
You sure it will be here before 2016? As for me i am waiting since before we signed for those extra 10 Mirage 2000s...Rafale - 2015-16.
AMCA - 2030+.
That's 15 years minimum.
Why can't that be addressed by opening another SU-30MKI line?Yes at least we should increase the number of FGFAs to be inducted and speedup the acquisiton process. As For Rafales they can be left for tackling Chinese J 10s & Pakistani F16 Block 54s. Going by the way IAF fighter squardons are shrinking we can't afford to cancel any such deal. Yes, we can still switch to Eurofighter Typhoons if we smack corruption in Rafale deal.
yes.. we still need to get 120+ su-mki's for IAF.... and that number 250+ MKI's will be suffient to take role of attack considering the threat. But rafale will defintely give us good advanatge in many other aspects. it's very good in BVR engaging , faster n smaller compared to MKI's which will make it much more agile (it has higher TWR also) and Maneuverable too.. so it has it's own advantages compared to MKI's.. and more over we still need them as multi role aircrafts not as attck option. who knows , IAF might have good plans for these fighters in coming years.Why can't that be addressed by opening another SU-30MKI line?
A filler is a filler anyway and SU-30MKI scores better on point of quick delivery and operational( no need it already is). In fact this option will address problem of strength depletion at least 2 years earlier than any new design. No?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rafale in Croatian Air Force | Military Aviation | 10 | ||
W | Rafale and F 18 super hornet shortlisted by Indian navy | Indian Navy | 21 | |
Indian Navy more likely to select F 18 than rafales | Indian Navy | 164 | ||
Greek Rafale vs Turkish EF 2000 Who has the Technolocal Edge | Military Aviation | 5 |