rishivashista13
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2016
- Messages
- 721
- Likes
- 655
It is not so common .
Which forces use this ?
Sent from my Micromax Q380 using Tapatalk
It is not so common .
Please correct me if i am wrong but i had no idea about the handling of amogh carbine before these pics but after seeing that pic in which that guy is aiming the cabine towards the fisherman i think this gun is pretty good for our SF, its compact and it deliver rounds with adequate accuracy and energy..
What is that hammer doing out there?These are the photos taken by me on range during 2013, While shooting and taking vid and clicks of newly issued Improved 1B1s, As i didn't wanted them on net immediately for security reasons ..
We have short 50ms and long range 200ms, The rifle were used at long range, Each soldier fires around 40 to 90rnds from each rifle.
Basic introduction to Improved 1B1 : Better metallurgy than 1B and older 1b1 which helps reduce the weight but the outer body metal sheet is thicker than earlier ones insuring higher safety ..
0. Better metallurgy.
1. Comes in Black.
2. Rifle Quality is improved.
3. Sound reduction.
where is this pic taken(i guess near sri lanka to catch fishermen)????
One more on amogh carbine ..
Good drawings .Those are some really cool pictures, the metal is looking awesome but OFB should try out design based on AR for Exculiber and Amogh, it will not only reduce its weight cause that design will force them to use fibre based body but it will allow the sapper to make necessary changes in riffles (they usually do such things)
here are some of the drawings representing most possible and appropriate design option for INSAS AR and INSAS LMG made by one of my friend Sayak Naskar..
View attachment 9632
The design for INSAS, he named it INSAS MKII
View attachment 9633
INSAS LMG
View attachment 9634
And the very interesting Kalantak
i am sure OFB must have more potent designers with knowledge of above field.
What is that hammer doing out there?
This is a reply for many who share similar misunderstanding..
Most of those who have no clue of combat, but a mere individual who acquires knowledge gleaned through glossies that are but publicity material of weapons company, who do their best to sell their weapons with contrived claims, Can come up with such view.
Let me put this whole in a very constructive way : The design of a firearm is around its practicality with respect to training and terrain and that is why every firearm looks different from one another in service with various nations which have capacity to makes its own firearm for its forces around the globe.
For example for any combat illiterate 1B1s 1990 GSQR design looks this way,1. 1B1`s carrying handle, 2 .exposed gas tube over the barrel, 3. stamped receiver with bolts looks very ugly and unattractive, 4. Carry on the 3o3 buttstock, and he get to conclusion as its unnecessary and 'chalta ha' job from designers.
The design is based on prepared requirement of Army or paramilitary, from barrel to butt, 1. That ugly carrying handle sticking out of the rifle is essential in long marches to carry it like suitcase for ease in transport, 2. The exposed gas tube over the barrel is kept exposed so that the solider can remove mud and soil from clogging it in harsh condition without much problems during combat, 3. The stamp receiver with bolt does sure looks ugly but good for mass production to arm an Army whose size is 10 million including Paramilitary, Army and police forces in less than 10 years, 4. The adaptation of outdated 3o3 butt-stock in mordern rifles such as 1B1 is because 3o3 butt stock was used by all types of martial races in India with success from short gorkhas and nagas to tall sikhs.
The service firearm is meant for combat, It does not matter how it looks, It does not matter how it feels personally to you but what matter most it should come out of trails by user and should work at place where it must.
Indian arm export are banned and only open to government to government dealings with friendly nations only..
==============
In case rifle needs a hammer and screw to keep it functional..
They should , a homemade rifle is highly preferable if it can fulfill requirements .I wonder if Army will give a chance to DRDO to develop 7.62 x 51 rifle or its just a pretext to side step Excaliber and MCIWS
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
'It's Good': When US Soldiers Fired INSAS Rifle In Joint Military Drill | Indian Army | 1 | ||
Exclusive: Made in India rifles to replace INSAS | Indian Army | 90 | ||
Insas Excalibur 5.56mm Assault Rifle 3d Art | Military Multimedia | 2 | ||
Regarding replacement of INSAS Rifle | Indian Army | 2 |