My whole family was watching with me Chandrayaan 2 landing. Even my father called me and said to remain awake.Oh maan i literally shred a tear after this setback , but i am glad whole country was awake for ISRO , this organisation has filled Indians with pride. When was the whole country awake at 2am last time??never but ISRO could do it.
We have always succeeded after such setbacks , remember i will call it a setback and not a failure cz 90% mission successful with no glitch.
Successful at
seperating lander from orbiter in 1st attempt
De orbiting maneuver for lander in 1st attempt.
Next time we will achieve it 100% , lets hope this setback propels government to give even more funds to ISRO.
Jai hind
Mission date for Chandrayaan 3 is 2024.Remember this tweet from 2010?
They didn't learn anything from that Two clowns have issued childish statement again.
See ya in 2025....
Source please.........................................................................View attachment 38286
Source @Gautam Sarkar
For a second there DSN Madrid was receiving data from the lander
Now it has disappeared. Madrid has lost LOS and Goldstone is tracking the orbiter.
Note the time stamp
.................
So as i previously alluded lander must have landed , but there was comms failure due to possible malfunction of some comms equipment . Higher that expected G forces might have induced anomalous behaviour in the comms component like displaced linkages or unintended transient voltage transfer shorting out the circuit's. If grounding is established maybe there is a chance to drain off surge voltage if any, unfortunately I have no understanding of the working of the same in space systems. So not 100% sure.but Similar power failures happened with isro satellites power bus.
Anyways sometimes systems can recover if lucky enough. Keeping fingers crossed.
https://eyes.nasa.gov/dsn/dsn.html go thereSource please.........................................................................
Nah, it's good. Simplest way to handle pork trolls is to to upload a meme, or else you have to actually read what they say... or write a reply.This is the thing wrong with some Indians... always looking for boogeymen rather than doing a methodical introspection with a singular desire to improve and achieve its goal.
There's nothing wrong in failing. Fsilure only becomes wrong and shameful if it defeats your spirit and stops your dreams. I ssy to my Indian friends, forget the boogeymen, improve and succeed for the moon is yours for the picking!
I know... That's not what I meant.The orbiter is functional. Very unlikely that the lander survived.
Thanks Man! Lets hope for the best !To add to it
" We have to find out from the communication data whether it is a soft landing or it is a crash landing.In my opinion,it is not a crash landing because the communication channel is on between the lander and the orbiter. It should be intact. ” - Fmr Isro chief
It will be reviewed now. ISRO was supposed to make lander, the most vital part for Japan in this upcoming mission. As it didn't work out as desired, project will come under scrutiny.Mission date for Chandrayaan 3 is 2024.
And scrutiny should come indeed ,this will only help us in our future missions. And ISRO with its record does rectify its mistakes and gets success , hope for the bestIt will be reviewed now. ISRO was supposed to make lander, the most vital part for Japan in this upcoming mission. As it didn't work out as desired, project will come under scrutiny.
If the lander is unable to send data inspite of the having a comm link with the orbiter what will the orbiter do ?Nah, it's good. Simplest way to handle pork trolls is to to upload a meme, or else you have to scraggly read what they say... or write a reply.
I know... That's not what I meant.
Can't the functional orbiter be used to reestablish communication with the lost lander? In which case, we will be sure whether it survived the landing or not...
The lander probably didnt survive the impact because it was tumbling and probably crashed at high velocity. The orbiter has passed over the landing/crash site, I suspect that the pictures are already available.Nah, it's good. Simplest way to handle pork trolls is to to upload a meme, or else you have to scraggly read what they say... or write a reply.
I know... That's not what I meant.
Can't the functional orbiter be used to reestablish communication with the lost lander? In which case, we will be sure whether it survived the landing or not...
sauce..............................................................................If the lander is unable to send data inspite of the having a comm link with the orbiter what will the orbiter do ?
The onboard TX/RX system requires the onboard data processing package to process data and format it for transmission over the same and vice versa after receiving the data. TX/RX system is working but the backend system which processes the data to be sent or be received seems not to be working at the he moment.
Voltage surge or transient leakage might be a reason , however systems can recover if it has the firmware installed to reboot.
Eg in a normal oscilloscope if it is subjected to out of range voltage beyond instrumented range , the output readings flatlines and shuts down to recover and then reboots if the surge voltage is no longer present.
what are the chances it landed on an inclined surface (like edge of crater?) , it might have tumbled down .. causing irregular or weak signals-- as lander might be in shadow and having incorrect orientation(coz of tumbling down)?If the lander is unable to send data inspite of the having a comm link with the orbiter what will the orbiter do ?
The onboard TX/RX system requires the onboard data processing package to process data and format it for transmission over the same and vice versa after receiving the data. TX/RX system is working but the backend system which processes the data to be sent or be received seems not to be working at the he moment.
Voltage surge or transient leakage might be a reason , however systems can recover if it has the firmware installed to reboot.
Eg in a normal oscilloscope if it is subjected to out of range voltage beyond instrumented range , the reading flatlines and shuts down to recover and then reboots if the surge voltage is no longer present.