mcpo117
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
- Messages
- 1,099
- Likes
- 2,270
I'm getting so fat probably Moon's gravity will crush me. So yeah that crater is scary as hell.Very scary,imagine falling in that crater so big
I'm getting so fat probably Moon's gravity will crush me. So yeah that crater is scary as hell.Very scary,imagine falling in that crater so big
Arthur PenroseWorld reknowned scientist? He has no scientific achievements. He is a public speaker with a PhD, that's it. And he's a complete dem establishment shill. Secondly, every serious physicist has turned against string theory, because it was bullshit from day 1. The likes of Michio Kaku and kumrum Vafa have spoilt the name of physics due to string theory, since it has had no shred of experimental evidence for 50 years and is going nowhere. They theorized things like multiverse or strings for decades, and every experiment they did trying to prove components of these things failed. Billions have been wasted in trying to validate insane string theorist claims.
Watch Arthur Penrose's body slamming of string theory. A new generation of physicists like Eric Weinstein are coming out who are exposing the cabal mentality and professional harm string theorists have done to actual physicists.
You're right, it's Roger Penrose. Will edit.Arthur Penrose
Or Roger Penrose
Lmao, WTF is this?? Nuclear Science is Brahmanical Patriarchyconversation that is happening now about 1 MP camera on a Indian rover that has already landed on moon is much better than conversations we used to have twenty years ago .
the infamous "bomb daddy" oped by rajdeep's wife sagarika ghosh.
Science is tough
And there was a time growing up I actually took Michio Kaku seriously. Shit!World reknowned scientist? He has no scientific achievements. He is a public speaker with a PhD, that's it. And he's a complete dem establishment shill. Secondly, every serious physicist has turned against string theory, because it was bullshit from day 1. The likes of Michio Kaku and kumrum Vafa have spoilt the name of physics due to string theory, since it has had no shred of experimental evidence for 50 years and is going nowhere. They theorized things like multiverse or strings for decades, and every experiment they did trying to prove components of these things failed. Billions have been wasted in trying to validate insane string theorist claims.
Watch Roger Penrose's body slamming of string theory. A new generation of physicists like Eric Weinstein are coming out who are exposing the cabal mentality and professional harm string theorists have done to actual physicists.
Spartans are little puppies infront of Emperorβs SpacemarinesAn aging Spartan and his malfunctioning AI
Quite the opposite. You'd weigh 1/6th of what you weigh on earth on the moon. So you'd be able to propel yourself out of that crater better than any world class high jumper.I'm getting so fat probably Moon's gravity will crush me. So yeah that crater is scary as hell.
Take it to appropriate thread and I'll tell you otherwise.Spartas are little puppies infront of Emperorβs Spacemarines
I'm gonna have to fall first to propel out.Quite the opposite. You'd weigh 1/6th of what you weigh on earth on the moon. So you'd be able to propel yourself out of that crater better than any world class high jumper.
Well just imagine your space suits helmet glass is broken as a result of fall and no oxygen,you're far away from moduleQuite the opposite. You'd weigh 1/6th of what you weigh on earth on the moon. So you'd be able to propel yourself out of that crater better than any world class high jumper.
Would be cool to retrieve Pragyan in one of our future manned missions. Or maybe they will let him call Moon home forever.The size of both the front cameras on the rover seems decent.
View attachment 219726
I hope the rover turns around while moving on the lunar surface & takes a picture of Vikram Lander.
I'd let that fuel rest there for any future emergency purpose. Like a manned mission to the same place.It seems due to optimised landing there is around 150 ltr. Of fuel is still remaining in lander just wondering if the lander can be kept alive during the lunar night
Not lander, propulsion module.It seems due to optimised landing there is around 150 ltr. Of fuel is still remaining in lander just wondering if the lander can be kept alive during the lunar night
I don't get why people here think isro scientists are morons. They certainly weighed the pros and cons when deciding video resolution. Higher resolutions and quality require more power to generate video. They want to keep the rover and lander running as long as possible, not shoot the next sequel of Avatar.
Literally nobody said ISRO scientists are morons, and nobody is criticising them for anything. Yes, they are more knowledgeable than all of us here, but that doesn't mean you have to justify each and everyone of their measures. Nobody is asking to record the landing in 4k 60fps, just something that is actually a video instead of interpolating some images. You can't tell me one of the most capable space agencies in the world is incapable of doing that.Scientists are scientists for some reason, not tom-dik-harry like you and me who thinks everything goes in like 4k UHD camera recording. And the mission is not a PR stunt or Bollywood movie.
The rover is at 'dark' side of moon, where little sun ray reaches, try your phone recording videos in that mode and it will drain the battery dry within an hr.
the more data you need to send the more power you consume. Here we have many tasks, little power source be it on board or solar means...
So, be happy and rejoice what our scientists gifted us to boast about, rather complaining like a snowflake .
Is it important for you to show your ignorance with such promptness?Literally nobody said ISRO scientists are morons, and nobody is criticising them for anything. Yes, they are more knowledgeable than all of us here, but that doesn't mean you have to justify each and everyone of their measures. Nobody is asking to record the landing in 4k 60fps, just something that is actually a video instead of interpolating some images. You can't tell me one of the most capable space agencies in the world is incapable of doing that.
One of the biggest achievements in Indian history could have certainly been recorded in a much better quality than some images stitched together. This has nothing to do with weight/cost/power consumption, this is more of a PR failure than anything, and yes, PR is important because this is a government agency with it's responsibility to the citizens.
Kindly tell me what the ignorance is? Just saying that the landing video could have been done better?Is it important for you to show your ignorance with such promptness?
So let me ask you a simple question here.Kindly tell me what the ignorance is? Just saying that the landing video could have been done better?
A video is essentially a bunch of images stacked one after the other. Btw the point is that if data transmission is indeed 1mbps then higher resolution would be a problem.Kindly tell me what the ignorance is? Just saying that the landing video could have been done better?