Dropping by to say- NCO was not a subordinate of my relative but his friend (of the same rank) who just happened to be fond of me.
So keep your mouth shut and don't get personal, because I have more than a few ways of getting personal myself.
Secondly, I asked- Where is the insult? This is where you're supposed to make your chin wag.
And again you tuck tails and run, resorting to ad hominem attacks.
So I ask you.
Go through the entire thread and show me where we insulted a soldier.
You have enough time to bullshit people by saying they're insulting soldiers, you have more than enough time to show where we were insulting soldiers.
View attachment 137794
Jokes aside, the more I read, the more I realize the average IQ of an Indian, while higher than Pakistanis, is a barely a point more.
Everytime there is a mention of something we could learn from the west, people start slinging mud at each other.
When there's no one talking about it, some idiots will gaslight with "well, what do muh western fenboys have to say about this?" or absolute stupid comparisons like "How would a Marine unit do in XYZ extreme environment where Indian Army has been training for years and the Marines will be dropped cold turkey without being acclimatized or trained for it?".
Well, shit dude, how about you give the exam for B.Tech's final year after preparing for MBBS and tell me how that goes?
Another common shit I see, and I think
@abingdonboy pointed it out too, was a very common SOP these absolute donkeys employ- Claiming something to be this super secret gear while we keep talking about it's uses and then, when it actually gets issued out, they turn around and say "See? We always had these!
NOW WHAT DO THE WESTERN FENBOYS HAVE TO SAY?".
The amount of verbal diarrhoea trips up someone into saying something mildly degrading for the soldiers because it's the nature of the discussion and then these 69-IQers say "YOU INSULTED MUH SOLDIERS!".
Seriously man.
Criticism =\= Disrespect
It's the recent spurt after Corona where people who can't write three sentences properly join and raise a hullaboo because they can't understand the nature of what is written (in jest or with seriousness) and then expect a clarification from the OP to compensate for their olympics level nibberism. (No, that's not a real word. Yes, I just made it up. Deal with it.
)
If there is to be a discussion, there will be two sides (for and against).
If there is a single side in a discussion (for+for or against+against), it's not a discussion, it's an echo chamber.
Echo chambers = bad
Discussions = good
69 IQ = Pakistani
Hotel = Trivago
Beat this into your head.