The reality is every country selects their rifle according to their war fighting needs.US army going to 6.8 ,marines with m27,israelis with x95 for urban needs.we are like always DUMB
In USA everyone has a M4A1 pattern assault rifle from Police to the military, we have a clusterfuck.
Why not go for 5.56 as standard? Just because your INSAS round was dumb doesn’t mean it will be the same for every gun, it had a 890m/s muzzle velocity with a fuckin 18.3” of barrel while an M4A1 has a 910m/s muzzle velocity with a 14.5” barrel. Obviously INSAS would’ve been useless. 890m/s is only slightly higher than some 5.56 NATO SBRs.
I don’t get this logic of 7.62 is better, if so why the Russians themselves don’t use it? The Bulgarians use 5.56x45mm NATO AK-47s (their own domestic Arsenal AKs), Poland uses 5.56x45mm NATO AK-47s (their own domestic Beryl AKs), Russians use 5.45x39 Kalashnikovs, Belarusian Army uses 5.45x39mm Kalashnikovs, Ukrainian Army standard is 5.45x39mm Kalashnikovs (ask
@Akim, if I’m wrong, I’ve seen only a few 7.62x39mm AKs in Ukrainian military). THESE ALL ARE SLAVIC COUNTRIES WHO ARE CULTURALLY VERY SIMILAR AND THEIR TERRAINS AND TRAINING ETC ARE SIMILAR).
NATO standard is 5.56x45 NATO cartridge, only the poor countries are using the 7.62x39mm as they don’t have any other choice snd options, most of post soviet states use 5.45x39.