Fine, I'll take the bait and bestow upon you the enlightenment that you seek, even though I'm fairly certain that it will be falling on deaf ears. So, here goes nothing -Lmao if u say so buddy.
You do realize that it's about the only AKM round that's been ever in use in India??!!I’m not sure if 7.62 M47 has been used in india.
Which makes no sense because they are chambered for completely different cartridges!! SLR, which are classified as battle rifles, are chambered in 7.62X51 NATO, which is a full sized rifle round and is far more powerful than the rounds that are used in AK variants, which is of 7.62X39 mm caliber - which is an intermediate cartridge with far less power. You get it now??I’m only comparing the 7.62 slr and AK
which is/was common to RR units and 5.56 ISNAS.
There is no such thing as a 5.56 M47!!You wanna buy the 5.56 M47?
Deserves no reply since it's total nonsense and that's putting it mildly.Sure! Run me the costs on that to standardize it not across the SF but the infantry.
So, sticking to an objective fact that is backed up by peer reviewable evidence is now considered to be fanboying by your generation??!! Wow!! What to say?? I'm in total loss for words.FYI- this heavy 5.56 fanboyism is heavy only in indian circles (which have no clue about combat).
Which 7.62?? If you mean the NATO one, then there is no contest but if you mean the AKM rounds, then the latest 5.56 variants handily beat the latest 7.62X39 variants in about every parameter.Ask any western enthusiast and they acknowledge 5.56 and 7.62 have their strengths and uses. But you know these guys have actual combat experience
Last edited: