Kumaoni
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2022
- Messages
- 8,555
- Likes
- 23,190
Also- this is what seperates paras from SAS and other SF. Paras are basically a damn fine super infantry force (no denying this- they can do disproportionate damage behind enemy lines)- but taking out HVTs, specializing in unconventional warfare (they have good stalking capabilities, but it hasn’t been exploited on to take down real HVTs), and decent assymetrical warfare experience (training NA in early 2000s).I mean professional ethos. No one can argue that Para SF (commandos as they were first called) have the same professional ethos/mandate/outlook as the SAS
paras have always been a raiding/super light infantry type unit, SAS from day 1 literally was conducting strategic operations (in Africa) to create an outsized damage on the entire battlefield. I don’t think Paras have ever aspired to that or even delivered that (71 Ops are maybe close to it but even that is well within the mandate of what conventional units in other militaries would do).
and where Paras are today to where SAS are today in terms of ethos could Not be further apart, I don’t think the SAS would even trust paras to be a blocking force for them
the founder of 9 para, Major Megh Singh, literally created a force to cause as much damage behind enemy lines as possible. The 1965 and 1971 raids had very little strategic outcome, and are thus great tactical actions. A strategic action would be raiding and destroying Pakistani HQs of brigade command and division command, as it would effectively collapse an entire front of the Paki army, thus achieving strategic outcome. SAS has been ruling in Africa and Arabia, although their ops in Afghandustan are subpar (then again- it’snot their war).