The kill ratio of the eagle is mainly due to it only taking on weak, undertrained, and underprepared air forces and ganging up to them with technological and numerical superiority.I want the F-15 to be part of the IAF inventory instead of the MIGs due to the kill ratio of the Eagle.
Doesn't matter, Russian improved their sighting and bombing computation solutions. Their campaign in Syria use old Su 24 with Gefest sight, it is economical and reliable.Is The IAF stockpile majorly made of Dumb bombs or PGBs?
During the first Gulf war the odds were the same. They, the Iraqi Air Force had a morally superior fighter fleet to most. The pilots flying the Iraqi aircraft were the elite and not the regulars. They even had an internal plan that sapped the morale of the opposing forces; even against those odds and some technical internal hostile plans, the Eagle was better, morally and as you mentioned technologically. So why not buy a supersonic air superiority (confirmed) fighter? Therefore before we jump into Fulcrums and get even more depressed, why don't we try for the F - 15 EX?The kill ratio of the eagle is mainly due to it only taking on weak, undertrained, and underprepared air forces and ganging up to them with technological and numerical superiority.
Hand over Eagle to Pakistan and we probably have the same verdict of 27th Feb (vintage Mig-21 owns F-16A)
At odds? The americans dominated the conflict from day one.nearly a 1000 aircraft took to air and crushed iraqi airforce in day one alone.only one fa18 was shot down by an iraqi mig 25.iraqi pilots had zero chance.During the first Gulf war the odds were almost the same. The pilots flying the Iraqi aircraft were the elite and not the regulars. They even had an internal plan that sapped the morale of the opposing forces; even against those odds and some technical internal hostile plans, the Eagle was better, morally and as you mentioned technologically. So why not buy a supersonic air superiority (confirmed) fighter? Therefore before we jump into Fulcrums and get even more depressed, why don't we try for the F - 15 EX?
At odds? The americans dominated the conflict from day one.nearly a 1000 aircraft took to air and crushed iraqi airforce in day one alone.only one fa18 was shot down by an iraqi mig 25.iraqi pilots had zero chance.
What you suggesting mate?
I'm tipping my hat....What you suggesting mate?
This is archiac technology. You should instead be wanting Tejas to be inducted in 18 per year ASAP. Improvements occur incrementally per batch.I want the F-15 to be part of the IAF inventory instead of the MIGs due to the kill ratio of the Eagle.
J7 is gonna be replace by junk fighter 17 according to porks.seems like Bison is more "katuwa" than J-7
20-25 years if left in proper storage.Western missiles last double of russian ones.we have around 200-250 Meteors but i am interested to know what is their shelf life.
In 1v1 always F-7... The cranked wing reduce the span-chord aspect ratio & allows greater sustained turn rate, while at the same time allowing greater low-speed maneuverability due to the frontal half acting like a LERX.just for info
there is a huge discussion happened in past...link hereIn 1v1 always F-7... The cranked wing reduce the span-chord aspect ratio & allows greater sustained turn rate, while at the same time allowing greater low-speed maneuverability due to the frontal half acting like a LERX.
THIS IS HOW YOU TAKE A FOREIGN DESIGN & MAKE IT YOURS.
F-7's aerodynamic performance is higher in almost all flight profiles, it's even lighter & has better visibility as well. Bison individually has better radar & bvr, but I'm talking platform... that's where Chinks introduced changes. Avionics are comparable in latest ones, with latest AIM-9 integrated to F-7.IMHO...bison can F*ck J-7 anytime anywhere... hell, it even f*cked F-16!!!
Again this topicOnly Indian still believe it fucked a F-16 & we still have no concrete evidence, just radar data in a mountainous area. R-73 launched doesn't mean F-16 down (in case you didn't know, R-73 fired from Tejas once failed to hit a dropping flare in training exercise). But that's beside the point here, just like it wouldn't mean Bison is better than F-16.
What is concrete evidence? Ah right, in the era of the camera, we want 4k-footage of a missile hitting the enemy plane and the exact expression of the enemy pilot while he prematurely releases excrement in face of immediate danger.Only Indian still believe it fucked a F-16 & we still have no concrete evidence, just radar data in a mountainous area
R-73s have decent ECCM features which detect and avoids going after flares. Also, the missile passed closed by without denotating. And that is exactly what is supposed to do, as a flare cannot trigger its proximity fuse to detonate.R-73 launched doesn't mean F-16 down (in case you didn't know, R-73 fired from Tejas once failed to hit a dropping flare in training exercise)