This illustrates your limited grasp of facts and the economic dynamics of countries.
I know very well about economic dynamics, industrial diversification (achieved with technological advancement) and law & order.
Latin America is upper middle economy. Richer than India and they are going to remain so for next 30 years at least.
That isn't even however even remotely related to our discussion. You have just showcased your low reasoning ability and you actually judge what people think while giving them arguments as per your perception while they didn't even say so.
I know where India stands in socio economic development with respect to Mexico.
Perhaps because you only hear about Mexican drug cartels and illegal migrants you immediately think that Mexico is a wasteland.
No, I'm not from that group. My PoV about any nation isn't formed by what's in media.
You said
"Mexico is catching up".
I said it isn't. Mexico is trapped in middle income trap and will caught up by South & Southeast Asia while surpassed in miles by East Asia.
And why do you think that despite all the ills plaquing Mexico it's able to maintain a much much higher per capita GDP than the very intelligent and very independent Indians? Because of its closeness, physically and economically, to theQUOT
Had Mexico been a little further from the US border then it would be a failed state by now. But because of its closeness to the US alone, India cannot surpass the per capita GDP of Mexico in the next 30 or even 50 years.
So now you understand the benefits you get from being close to the World's most dominant country?
Mexico is a Latin American country and its socio economic pros cons are same as that of any Latin American country.
It's been a quite interesting thing I've been observing. Economic booms don't happen to a country but an entire region of similar people with few exceptions (like Afghanistan & North Korea).
So is their cultural sphere. Eurpe's poorest countries (who are upper middle income & lower middle income countries) have development indicators far ahead of their counterparts with same income in rest of word. Asian countries with low & lower middle income have lives much better off than Africans despite close income levels.
Similarly, states in proximity to US get benefits from its large and advanced economy. And most obviously a large & strong state would want its neighborhood to be peaceful to guarantee its internal security so that it can take care of its interests in rest of world.
So, the countries who are regionally dominant affect economy & culture of their sphere of influence greatly. Be it US in North Atlantic or Japan & China in East & Southeast Asia.
It's not US alone most obviously.
And by light years I will never exchange closer foreign relations with the US for China, even if China's economy becomes bigger than that of the US.
On the day when China trumps US as most dominant country too?