India China LAC & International Border Discussions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bhadra

New Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,756
Country flag
All are possibel raesons but for a military Operation the aims and obejctive can not be so vast and varied. Military Operations are not looking London seeing Tokiyo. They have to be focused on singular aim. Though the aim itself may have various results.

Item serial 1, Serial 2 and 10 are same. Limited Swift and intense Military Operation to inflict losses to humiliate India and USA.

Item serial 3. 4, 5 and 6 are identical. Gain territories with some view.

Item 8 and 9 are the same....

In order to decipher it one has see where all and in what strength did the Chinese come and what they tried to do. From their actions it is clear they built pressure on DSDBO road and DBO with a view to achieve multiple objectives directly linked to CPEC.
 

garg_bharat

New Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
5,078
Likes
10,138
Country flag
If anybody thinks Chinese put together a 30,000 strong force on the LAC with heavy weapons and moved all kinds of aircraft into Tibet close to Ladakh just to run at the first sight of causalities; he is daydreaming.

All major wars of China involved lot of Chinese losses (even in millions). The stakes have never been higher than they are today.

There is a chinese virus doing the rounds with 550k official deaths (and perhaps close to one million unofficial). There is talk to shut Chinese off from Western trade and investment sphere. And there is military activity to target Chinese influence already.

China is not running away until defeated. India needs to accept the reality and put together a plan to get needed armaments and soldiers.
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
New Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,378
This is a mundane over diagnosing of the obvious.

A week ago I read same kind of eulogy per say of China by a good member.

Nations run like corporations and handle multiple issues at one time with lowest possible denominators bulwarked behind exaggerated targets.

How about Modi and Trump decided at Hyderabad house to pull a rug or two under the feet of Xi and Modi got Indian army start aggressive patrolling to spook PLA. Look at the timing of 2 American aircraft carriers with their respective IBGs at South Vietnam sea to check PLAN.

The habit of Indians seeing the merit in he adversary’s actions is becoming quite boring now.
 

Belagutti

New Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2020
Messages
127
Likes
128
Country flag
chinese are not retreating they’re preparing they’re waiting for right moment to attack India like Indian army waited for right moment to attack Pakistan in 1971
So are we ready to make a graveyard for them, but there ia not enough space's to make the grave of the 20 lakh chinese army in ladakh should make more graves in anuchal pradesh to accommodate their graves.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,609
Likes
25,436
Country flag
Now some people will claim that it was tactic by China but their actual intention was some thing else. But still they got failed

This could be the following intentions of China.
▪To stop infrastructure.
Result- infrastructure will continue to grow on our side now even at faster rate.
obective- failed.
▪To stop formation of quad.
Result- Quad is already operational now only formal announcement has to be made by leaders of 4 countries.
objective- failed.
▪To get trade concessions.
Result- suffered billions in losses.
Objective- failed.
▪To weaken the image of nationalist govt.
Result- modi has become even more popular as first time in history Chinese tactic of salami slicing and then getting concessions has failed.
objective - failed.
  • India LOST in 1962!
  • Nehru died in 1964! Thank God! He died of STD as some reported!
  • China LOST in 1967 at Nathu La/Chola. ~400 PLA Vs ~90 IA
  • China LOST in 1975 when Sikkim became India. Frustrated China could not even start any "skirmish" for massaging it's EEE(Expansionist Everest Ego)
  • China LOST in 1987 when Arunachal became Indian. Same result as above.
  • China LOST in 2017 at Doklam standoff. Shamefully backed off.
  • China LOST in 2020 at Galwan. 40 to 100 PLA Vs 20 IA and then China had to backoff.

As a FACT I see people on international platforms laughing at how China doesn't even accept 1 dead PLA soldier and still Commi Chinese defending it by their weird logic. One Chine said Indian PM didn't visit any of the Indian soldier martyred but not answered why China doesn't even accept 1 dead when ~40 died and some Chinese insiders claim it was ~100 dead! :rofl:

bhai, abhi deescalation ko khatam toh hone doh.. :lawl:
i think china is pulling a fast one on us :pound:
If you irritate way too much then PLA would vacate till Beijing. :troll:

entire kashmir and arunachal has been swallowed.. bc.. :mad2:.. inki G**** mein dandruff hojayega ek din
You would not let poor Chinese save their EEE(Expansionist Everest Ego) by at least making the map of their choice? Be human!

Here is for you so cool down! :playball:

China map 3.jpg


China map 2.jpg


China map.jpg
COVID China.jpg
 
Last edited:

garg_bharat

New Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
5,078
Likes
10,138
Country flag
This is a mundane over diagnosing of the obvious.

A week ago I read same kind of eulogy per say of China by a good member.

Nations run like corporations and handle multiple issues at one time with lowest possible denominators bulwarked behind exaggerated targets.

How about Modi and Trump decided at Hyderabad house to pull a rug or two under the feet of Xi and Modi got Indian army start aggressive patrolling to spook PLA. Look at the timing of 2 American aircraft carriers with their respective IBGs at South Vietnam sea to check PLAN.

The habit of Indians seeing the merit in he adversary’s actions is becoming quite boring now.
Trump is out of loop. Trump is a pacifist. There is no chance there is a secret plan.
China is in the driver seat at the moment. It is China that is causing all the trouble.

Trump did not want Covid19. Trump wanted a peaceful 2020 with stock market soaring.

But there is a deep State in USA that has its own mind.

Iranian oil delivered to Venezuala but the refinery to process that oil has been set on fire. This is how Americans are going to work I think. Iran's Natanz enrichment complex has been partially destroyed.

Turkey is also a target now, starting from its forces in Libya.
 

utubekhiladi

The Preacher
New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
4,768
Likes
10,311
Country flag
  • India LOST in 1962!
  • Nehru died in 1964! Thank God! He died of STD as some reported!
  • China LOST in 1967 at Nathu La/Chola. ~400 PLA Vs ~90 IA
  • China LOST in 1975 when Sikkim became India. Frustrated China could not even start any "skirmish" for massaging it's EEE(Expansionist Everest Ego)
  • China LOST in 1987 when Arunachal became Indian. Same result as above.
  • China LOST in 2017 at Doklam standoff. Shamefully backed off.
  • China LOST in 2020 at Galwan. 40 to 100 PLA Vs 20 IA and then China had to backoff.

As a FACT I see people on international platforms laughing at how China doesn't even accept 1 dead PLA soldier and still Commi Chinese defending it by their weird logic. One Chine said Indian PM didn't visit any of the Indian soldier martyred but not answered why China doesn't even accept 1 dead when ~40 died and some Chinese insiders claim it was ~100 dead! :rofl:



If you irritate way too much then PLA would vacate till Beijing. :troll:



You would not let poor Chinese save their EEE(Expansionist Everest Ego) by at least making the map of their choice? Be human!

Here is for you so cool down! :playball:

View attachment 52283

View attachment 52282

View attachment 52284View attachment 52285

where is china on this map :pound: :pound: :pound: :pound: :pound: :pound: :pound:
 

Bhadra

New Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,756
Country flag
what do u think about the buffer zone.
It has been clarified that :
^ Buffer zones are only "temporary" aimed at avoiding military confrontations during the process of disengagements.
^ The distances the forces will gow away from points of contact will be different for each point.
^ Such buffer zones will be verified for disengagement compliance by both sides jointly.
^ The buffer will have not effect on each others perception of LAC.
^ After disengagement both sides can resume patrolling in normal manner.
 

garg_bharat

New Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
5,078
Likes
10,138
Country flag
Nice analysis by Major Gaurav Arya.
This kind of analysis is for the ignorant public - or what you call vote catchers.

India has a serious situation on the borders and MUST act accordingly.

There is no de-escalation worth the name. There is a tactical move probably due to monsoon. Any chances of 'peace' are remote.

Brahma Chellaney is part of Congress ecosystem. These guys want war badly at this point, and want to see Indian army beaten by the Chinese.

The correct approach is to keep dis-engaged while preparing for war.
 

doreamon

New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
3,007
Likes
15,164
Country flag
This kind of analysis is for the ignorant public - or what you call vote catchers.

India has a serious situation on the borders and MUST act accordingly.

There is no de-escalation worth the name. There is a tactical move probably due to monsoon. Any chances of 'peace' are remote.
Why india agreed to create buffer zone on its own land ? because we want deescalation ... china still saying loudly entire galwan valley is theirs .. nd we agreed to move our troops from there .. china took there troops to their side of LAC .. I want 2 ask people who wants to take back aksai chin , POK and give freedom to Tibet r u living in real world ??
 

abhay rajput

New Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
727
Likes
1,549
Country flag
Why india agreed to create buffer zone on its own land ? because we want deescalation ... china still saying loudly entire galwan valley is theirs .. nd we agreed to move our troops from there .. china took there troops to their side of LAC .. I want 2 ask people who wants to take back aksai chin , POK and give freedom to Tibet r u living in real world ??
The buffer zone is on both sides but it's a little bit more on our side. It's only for 30 days till all disengagement is completed. No patrol till 30 days after that it would be go back to normal patrolling from both sides. Remember that Chinese too come to pp14 as last stop in there patrol just like us. If they move back from finger area back to status quo of April , then all good otherwise we will lost.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Articles

Top