Since when is Om Mani Padme Hun a mantra from Sanatan Dharma ? Are you confusing Buddhism especially esoteric Tantric Buddhism which is Tibetan Buddhism to Sanatan Dharma ? Besides Burma has always been Buddhist with strong Hindu influences not the other way around. Ditto for Thailand.
Nations today where sects of Sanatan Dharma thrived were Indonesia , Malaysia , Western Philippines , Cambodia , South Vietnam & Laos to an extent before they were supplanted by Buddhism. Angkor Wat provides the clearest example of the latter .
Appreciate you replying and also respect your expansion on the topic that deserves its seriousness. You do cover a lot but perhaps it is far more wider and deeper to what you say.
Lets also not forget the Communist Chinese always have a proud (like Panda sovereignty - that only ailuropoda melanoleuca can be born Chinese - not even runaway ones) saying that the "chinese" language can be read by all but spoken differently - Cantonese to Mandarin etc. very touchy on how the language is read.
Like you have used many many many items and allowed the reader to go and read about it and increase the scope -> why Sanskrit.
Lets make it simple and say loudly perhaps one can say that the decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent coincides with the spread of Islam? Is that right ?
on topic of chinese language - why have chinese in such a temple ? wherever it is ... perhaps its buddhism.
Appreciate you replying and also respect your expansion on the topic that deserves its seriousness. You do cover a lot but perhaps it is far more wider and deeper to what you say.
Lets also not forget the Communist Chinese always have a proud (like Panda sovereignty - that only ailuropoda melanoleuca can be born Chinese - not even runaway ones) saying that the "chinese" language can be read by all but spoken differently - Cantonese to Mandarin etc. very touchy on how the language is read.
Like you have used many many many items and allowed the reader to go and read about it and increase the scope -> why Sanskrit.
Lets make it simple and say loudly perhaps one can say that the decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent coincides with the spread of Islam? Is that right ?
on topic of chinese language - why have chinese in such a temple ? wherever it is ... perhaps its buddhism.
And how many such Buddhist temples have you seen with Raja Ravi Varma calendar art in SE Asia or E Asia ( Tibetan monasteries or temples in India don't count ) ?
Lets make it simple and say loudly perhaps one can say that the decline of Buddhism in the Indian subcontinent coincides with the spread of Islam? Is that right ?
The virtual eradication of Buddhism from the subcontinent is attributable to Islam. Though there is a small, vocal tribe of historians( eg D.N Jha) who would like to blame Hinduism for its disappearance. But even these historians would have an enormously difficult time proving that Hindus wiped out Buddhism from Afghanistan, Central Asia and West Asia. What can be said with some veracity is that beginning with the philosopher Shankara in the 8th century, many Buddhists returned to the Hindu fold, and Buddha himself was now accepted as an avatar of Vishnu. There was no violence, or very negligible violence, involved in this process.
China never claimed the whole of Ladakh, even at the height of the Sino-Indian war in 1962, and for decades after that. So by "western border of Ladakh" I hope they mean the current line of demarcation, which India doesn't accept as a permanent arrangement, though India is not aggressively demanding that the border go all the way to the eastern extremities. But if the China actually mean the current area of Ladakh as part of Kashmir and India, they are off their rocker.
China never claimed the whole of Ladakh, even at the height of the Sino-Indian war in 1962, and for decades after that. So by "western border of Ladakh" I hope they mean the current line of demarcation, which India doesn't accept as a permanent arrangement, though India is not aggressively demanding that the border go all the way to the eastern extremities. But if the China actually mean the current area of Ladakh as part of Kashmir and India, they are off their rocker.
It's actually very funny.. It was a master stroke by Modi Government..
Every time there was any problem in JandK or Ladakh with Pakistan, China would preach both conveying a sense of fake neutrality.. China does not recognize the Ladakh border as part of China India border. Hence, China says.. Indo China border is 2000 odd kilometers and not 3500 km .. By creating the Ladakh Union territory, Modi forced China to do away with fake neutrality, and acknowledge the Ladakh Border issue openly.. Now, China must deal with India, or attack and try to capture the Indian part of Ladakh (if it deems it as part of China, just like Arunachal) .. That is why the Chinks are so angry... Their pawn Pakistan is no longer able to deter India, and the master has been forced to come out in the open..
Also, Parveen Swiney, was saying that Modi would not be able to handle the pressure from Galactic superpower China, and would undo Ladakh Union territory decision of 2019, via Supreme Court.. Well, Supreme Court just made the decision permanent..
Since China has declared Ladakh as to be Chinese territory, it is time for India to pull the gloves off its hands and declare Chinese occupation of Tibet to be unlawful and impair the sovereignty of an independent nation and declare Tibet to be an independent nation. And also declare Taiwan as a free independent country and is will to provide consular services to Taiwan.
What is the point of playing to Chinese sensitivities? We literally have nothing to lose now. China is massively arming Pakistan even if Pakistan cannot pay for it. China is fomenting anti-India sentiments in Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma and even in NE states.
We need to stop being passive and go on the fucking offensive.
Since China has declared Ladakh as to be Chinese territory, it is time for India to pull the gloves off its hands and declare Chinese occupation of Tibet to be unlawful and impair the sovereignty of an independent nation and declare Tibet to be an independent nation. And also declare Taiwan as a free independent country and is will to provide consular services to Taiwan.
What is the point of playing to Chinese sensitivities? We literally have nothing to lose now. China is massively arming Pakistan even if Pakistan cannot pay for it. China is fomenting anti-India sentiments in Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma and even in NE states.
We need to stop being passive and go on the fucking offensive.
Since China has declared Ladakh as to be Chinese territory, it is time for India to pull the gloves off its hands and declare Chinese occupation of Tibet to be unlawful and impair the sovereignty of an independent nation and declare Tibet to be an independent nation. And also declare Taiwan as a free independent country and is will to provide consular services to Taiwan.
What is the point of playing to Chinese sensitivities? We literally have nothing to lose now. China is massively arming Pakistan even if Pakistan cannot pay for it. China is fomenting anti-India sentiments in Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma and even in NE states.
We need to stop being passive and go on the fucking offensive.
China is an imperialist land which suffers from a severe inferiority complex as a result of having a period in life where pretty much every single race in the 1800s.
Trying to reason with them would be as foolish as trying to reason with hitler to stop invading russia or europe.
And tbh, China is also occupying Manchu Lands, Uyghur Lands asides from tibet, and is currently bullying south east asia in the south china sea, while trying to intimidate a far smaller taiwan.
China is an imperialist land which suffers from a severe inferiority complex as a result of having a period in life where pretty much every single race in the 1800s.
Trying to reason with them would be as foolish as trying to reason with hitler to stop invading russia or europe.
And tbh, China is also occupying Manchu Lands, Uyghur Lands asides from tibet, and is currently bullying south east asia in the south china sea, while trying to intimidate a far smaller taiwan.
There’s no point in reasoning with them. Just tell them that Tibet is a free country and Taiwan is a separate country and that Uighurs deserve their own state. And provide material support.
There’s no point in reasoning with them. Just tell them that Tibet is a free country and Taiwan is a separate country and that Uighurs deserve their own state. And provide material support.
I think destabilizing china would be an amazing way to go. Considering the fact that china does this numerous times to India be it the Maoists or the NE. The issue is, China is more unified and has more of a firm control. India due to the iron first the CCP wields. Even if we do fund insurgencies, they will go all out in quelling them, using their air force and commiting huge HRVs.
I think destabilizing china would be an amazing way to go. Considering the fact that china does this numerous times to India be it the Maoists or the NE. The issue is, China is more unified and has more of a firm control. India due to the iron first the CCP wields. Even if we do fund insurgencies, they will go all out in quelling them, using their air force and commiting huge HRVs.
Lt. Gen. Raj Shukla engages in a comprehensive discussion on the current global geopolitical landscape, with a particular focus on military challenges, technological advancements, and the need for India to strengthen its defense capabilities. The conversation covers various key points:
1. Global Challenges and Conflicts:
- Describes the current global situation as being on the edge, likening it to a powder keg.
- Mentions the idea that the world entered a pre-war era in 2014, a perspective echoed by military thinkers.
- Highlights ongoing conflicts and threats worldwide, from Europe to Asia.
2. Failure of American Deterrence:
- Points out the failure of American deterrence, citing examples such as China's military coercion and the challenges faced by the U.S. Navy.
- Discusses the impact of China's anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) strategy on American military influence in the Pacific.
- Raises concerns about the mismatch between American defense spending, global commitments, and the actual outcomes in conflicts.
3. Technological Shift and Military Strategy:
- Emphasizes the transformative power of technology in shaping military strategies.
- Highlights China's success in converting economic and technological advantages into hard power.
- Stresses the importance of AI, quantum computing, and other advanced technologies in modern warfare.
4. India's Response and National Security Makeover:
- Advocates for a comprehensive national security makeover in India, integrating advanced technologies into military planning.
- Recommends reducing the power asymmetry with China through technological advancements.
- Discusses the role of AI, quantum computing, and civil-military fusion in strengthening India's defense capabilities.
5. Role of Private Sector and Cultural Transitions:
- Discusses the changing role of the private sector in defense, citing examples like Airbus challenging the monopoly of certain defense technologies.
- Emphasizes the need for cultural transitions within the armed forces to foster innovation, with a focus on joint collaboration between military, academia, and the private sector.
- Advocates for military leaders to be actively involved in the development and understanding of advanced technologies.
6. Ideation, Innovation, and Execution:
- Highlights the importance of ideation coupled with execution, with an emphasis on understanding and embracing new technologies.
- Recommends deep reforms, especially in the areas of unlocking military data and fostering a data-driven and AI-supported military environment.
7. Strategic Reforms and Collaboration:
- Recommends reforms such as involving the private sector at the conceptual stage and changing the career trajectories of military officers to foster strategic thinking.
- Advocates for the creation of think tanks and innovative platforms akin to China's approach.
8. Conclusion:
- Stresses the urgency of scaling up and speeding up technological advancements and collaborations to address evolving security challenges.
- Encourages India to think originally and strategically to compete with China in technological and military innovation.
Overall, Lt. Gen. Raj Shukla's discussion underscores the critical intersection of global geopolitics, technological advancements, and the imperative for India to strengthen its defense capabilities through innovation and strategic reforms.