India-China Border conflict

[asaffronladoftherisingsun]

Unlike you I am born, raised and work in India. I don't need to prove my allegiance to some US based PooTin simp.

Typical of your pajeeta tier deduction.

What has residential status got to do with @Blademaster's eternal Kinship to DHARMA?

 

[Love Charger]

Typical of your pajeeta tier deduction.

What has residential status got to do with @Blademaster's eternal Kinship to DHARMA?

Wo ek purush hain

 

[mokoman]

@mokoman @mist_consecutive
routine or out of ordinary?
======
Many Flights to Lhasa Gonggar are also being cancelled. We have to see if there is an uptick in military air traffic over the Tibetan plateau or not.

Nothing civilian or with its transponder on seems to be flying over TAR at the moment.

Honestly looks like psyops spread by indian gov to mock xi jingping

 

[ezsasa]

Honestly looks like psyops spread by indian gov to mock xi jingping

haven't followed this today, but yesterday my observation was that it was initially amplified by the same U.S/taiwan based folks who posted the "taiwan invasion preparations" by some chini city.

we are in the loop, because our folks get excited with these sort of stories.

 

[flanker99]

Nothing is out of ordinary over chinese airspace I've compared the airspace over a week ago to today no significant change ...or whatever is happening has been happening for over a week
Likely covid related delays

 

[mist_consecutive]

Honestly looks like psyops spread by indian gov to mock xi jingping

Today things seem to be back to normal. Yesterday was almost devoid of flights over mainland China, a phenomenon that cannot be a coincidence given how busy China's economy is.

Possible they were COVID protocols or even some disaster drill. But the cancellation of flights was indeed something suspicious.

 

[omaebakabaka]

Today things seem to be back to normal. Yesterday was almost devoid of flights over mainland China, a phenomenon that cannot be a coincidence given how busy China's economy is.

Possible they were COVID protocols or even some disaster drill. But the cancellation of flights was indeed something suspicious.

It is the opposite of what is being suiggested, Xi is purging heavily and moving pieces to prevent anything like that from occurring. At this point, his loyalists are deeply ingrained, odds are he will go out as Deng.

 

[flanker99]

 

[IndianSpiderman]

Most likely Xi wanted to consolidate power/purge challengers, so he planted a tale about him being dethroned to be spread as a distraction, and our twitterati obliged unwittingly. But, yeah, what's been happening is highly unusual.

 

[Blademaster]

From what I have seen our resident PooTin simp gang tries silencing other that don't adhere to their opnion.
I am just interested in silencing chut***tyas that unnecessarily tag me or respond to me with imaginary BS.
Still haven't responded why you removed US location from your profile.
Unlike you I am born, raised and work in India. I don't need to prove my allegiance to some US based PooTin simp.

And I don't need to prove my allegiance to some India based westoid loving simp either. How did I silence you when your posts didn't adhere to my opinion? You are the one making up imaginary attacks and BS and then trying to blame it on others.

How many times will you make me repeat the bellow statement
It is not about what PRC lost but about status of Indian boundary and problems Indians will face due to this issue.

Newsflash: This issue will not go away and will persist as long as China occupies Tibet. Kumaoni's point was that India did not meekly give up land.

 

[Vikram314]

Mouthpiece of Cheecheep has confirmed that all is well in chyna.

 

[mist_consecutive]

ITBP or Army? Questions arise on who will lead patrolling as LAC-China tensions continue

Defence establishment feels LAC is an active border & hence ITBP should be brought under its control, but MHA feels otherwise citing 'one border, one force' concept.

theprint.in

Print Alert

---------------------------------------------------------------------

If this article is correct, it shows the fundamental thinking problem of Indian babudom.

Sources said the idea behind giving the ITBP a more active role is that it is a police force and sends out the right message that it is the police forces who man the borders and not the Army. “In most countries, it is the paramilitary or specialised border guarding forces which man the borders with the military staying behind,” one of the sources said

Cucked thinking

This is not the first time the Army has expressed this plan. In 2015 when Defence Minister Rajnath Singh was the then Home Minister, the Army had proposed the same. But the proposal was shot down, a decision which had the nod of then defence minister Manohar Parrikar, the sources said.

MHA trying to take control of things clearly out of its apetite

A third source said unlike ITBP, the BDRs are an integral part of the Chinese army and not a central armed police force. These units are equipped and trained in a similar manner to that of PLA battalions unlike the ITBP, the sources said.

Moreover, with the forward deployment of PLA forces, there is no method to distinguish between troops of regular PLA units or of the Border Defence units, the sources argued

Yeah, China can deploy their army for patrolling but we have to use police to "send the correct message".

Explaining why the ITBP should not be brought under the control of the Army, sources argued that the border guarding force acts as the parallel eyes and ears of the government.

‘The government assesses a situation and makes decisions not based on one agency but several others. Even in the current stand-off, ITBP inputs were useful,” said a source in the security establishment.

This is the problem. Govt. does not trust the army. God save this country.

 

[mist_consecutive]

ITBP or Army? Questions arise on who will lead patrolling as LAC-China tensions continue

Defence establishment feels LAC is an active border & hence ITBP should be brought under its control, but MHA feels otherwise citing 'one border, one force' concept.

theprint.in

Print Alert

---------------------------------------------------------------------

If this article is correct, it shows the fundamental thinking problem of Indian babudom.



Cucked thinking



MHA trying to take control of things clearly out of its apetite



Yeah, China can deploy their army for patrolling but we have to use police to "send the correct message".



This is the problem. Govt. does not trust the army. God save this country.

 

[notaname]

ITBP or Army? Questions arise on who will lead patrolling as LAC-China tensions continue

Defence establishment feels LAC is an active border & hence ITBP should be brought under its control, but MHA feels otherwise citing 'one border, one force' concept.

theprint.in

Print Alert

---------------------------------------------------------------------

If this article is correct, it shows the fundamental thinking problem of Indian babudom.



Cucked thinking



MHA trying to take control of things clearly out of its apetite



Yeah, China can deploy their army for patrolling but we have to use police to "send the correct message".



This is the problem. Govt. does not trust the army. God save this country.

Didn't print said this sometime back also??? Now how come again thing is there?

Edit ::: Not print but this one.
_____________

If this is true then govt is bending backwards to appease China. Instead of giving greater control to Army over ITBP for better coordination and swifter response they are going retrograde. They want to deploy a police force against a bully who respects no rules.

The govt really running shit scared of China.

 

[spiritb2]

Too late but nevertheless.

 

[AlphaLegis]

Didn't print said this sometime back also??? Now how come again thing is there?

Edit ::: Not print but this one.
_____________

The government is afraid to escalate, is visible in it's action. Deployment of Army at Chinese border permanently is seen as an escalation hence this stupid formulation from GoI. Untill the govt. defines it's red lines publicly and tries to protect it, there is nothing to bind it's actions. The Chinese have been using this reactionary mindset of us to impose cost at their will and to their advantage. The perceived "fear of loss" is what plagues this government.

 

[Jimih]

It seems that GoI has this notion that having the ITBP on the LAC would reduce the possibility of a conflict.

ITBP should be in IA's operational control, enough of this factional rivalry bakchodi.

 

[mist_consecutive]

Now guess which Corps were moved to Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh for month-long exercise sometime this year ?

 

[fooLIam]

It seems that GoI has this notion that having the ITBP on the LAC would reduce the possibility of a conflict.

ITBP should be in IA's operational control, enough of this factional rivalry bakchodi.

Ek IPS ki kursi kam ho jayegi.

 

[Jimih]

Now guess which Corps were moved to Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh for month-long exercise sometime this year ?

All the four Corps