garg_bharat
New Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 5,078
- Likes
- 10,138
So global times thinks all Indian scholars are anti-China! Quite a statement.GobarTimes should shut the frack up - Experts at DFI opine:-
So global times thinks all Indian scholars are anti-China! Quite a statement.GobarTimes should shut the frack up - Experts at DFI opine:-
i was once banned from a paki forum the only one i ever was on more than a decade ago for asking about this. the answer is usa absolutely will not allow it.
R-37M is essentially an Awacs killer with 600+ kg weight and its replacement Novator missile with around 750 kg weight and 400+ km range around. It's not a meteor equivalent for Sukhoi.On the IR side, ASRAAM will be integrated with the SU-30, Jaguar and LCA. Mica-IR is already on the Mirage 2000 after the upgrade and also on the Rafale. From this it looks likely that the IAF will have 2 IR missiles and the SU-30 test firing was to also enable the huge SU-30 fleet to be able to use Mica-IR stocks. After all when you have 2 IR missiles it makes sense to have as much commonality in terms of platforms as possible. In a war scenario you do not want a situation that you have Mica-IR stocks and are running short on ASRAAMs, but you cannot use the Mica on the SU-30.
While not definite, I don't think the IAF is going for the R-74. They may have tested it, but ASRAAM and Mica-IR will be it's 2 mainstay IR AAMs.
The R-37M may be bought in limited quantities for it's specialized role as an ultra long range AAM for the SU-30, complementing the Meteor on the Rafale.
I doubt that the R-77-1 will be bought in quantities. Just enough to tide over and transition till the Astra becomes available in quantities.
Bigger question what will happen to SAAB AWACS?
First articles clearing way for India Russia China meet without looking like GoI rolled over.Completely contradicting reports, earlier somebody had posted a article that said that talks were useless.
Why the hell was rhe order given to them in the first place.More soft screwing
i was thinking same thing.Why the hell was rhe order given to them in the first place.
Vande bharat is our own design right.
Design yes but imported parts were assembled to manufacture it.Why the hell was rhe order given to them in the first place.
Vande bharat is our own design right.
Vande Bharat's original two trainsets (Train 18 and Train 20) were built at ICF Chennai, but didn't have the blessings (read: upstream bribery) of Rail Bhavan Delhi. So they punished the entire ICF design team, terminated dozens of engineers behind the project (who moved on to foreign jobs), and ran a fresh tender for trainsets, including Chinese participation. This was before Ladakh happened.Why the hell was rhe order given to them in the first place.
Vande bharat is our own design right.
I dont think we need Chinese technology for train engines. Chinese are undercutting everything on price. It is like my cheap washing machine - company refuses to provide warranty service.i was thinking same thing.
https://www.livemint.com/news/india...or-44-vande-bharat-trains-11594510672552.html
CRRC Corporation Ltd with a Gurugram-based company according to its website, is one of the six contenders for the tender for procuring propulsion systems or electric traction kits for 44 trains to function as the Vande Bharat Express or Train 18.
Officials said going by the cost of manufacturing the first Train 18 which was launched last year at an expense of Rs 100 crore out of which Rs 35 crore was for the propulsion system alone, the present tender for 44 such kits would be worth over Rs 1,500 crore.
Its a joint venture , i am guessing the local employees will get fucked.
We could pull a "china" on them , steal their IP and cut them off ,
So china is openly calling for unrest in kashmir which is integral part of india.Oppose 'unilateral' steps: China to Pak on Kashmir
Well what China is saying and what China is doing is absolutely clear.So china is openly calling for unrest in kashmir which is integral part of india.
And what are we doing ?
scared to take position on hongkon, taiwan, tibet, xinjiang ?
Reading this is just sad train 18 and when train 20 came out were both highly promising projects who could have changed the face of railways in this country.Vande Bharat's original two trainsets (Train 18 and Train 20) were built at ICF Chennai, but didn't have the blessings (read: upstream bribery) of Rail Bhavan Delhi. So they punished the entire ICF design team, terminated dozens of engineers behind the project (who moved on to foreign jobs), and ran a fresh tender for trainsets, including Chinese participation. This was before Ladakh happened.
But yeah, that's the absolute state of Indian foreign maal fetish.
Indian Railways is 1000x more foreign addicted than the military, right from the LHB coach design, to the ABB, Alstrom, and GM-EMD locos beating BHEL- and TATA-made locos, and more. They deliberately set parameters to exclude Indian companies, because foreign companies can afford to bribe Railway Board members, and fund their children's American dreams.
Compared to fighter jets, railway locomotives are extremely easy to design, and Indian companies do have the expertise to design and mass produce thousands of them. BHEL used to supply hundreds of electric locos, and was on its way to design the 9-class loco, but some babu decided to take a foreign-funded Swiss vacation. We then got overpriced ABB locos (WAG-9 and WAP-7), which are fast becoming IR's workhorses. DLW came up with many innovative locos in the 2000s, but they were cast aside for American GE and French Alstrom locos.
If journalists start digging, they'll find hundreds of Bofors-level scams in the Railways.
Vocal for local my ass.
Railway is shithole.Reading this is just sad train 18 and when train 20 came out were both highly promising projects who could have changed the face of railways in this country.
But at this point I'm used to such disappointments.
Fresh modified tender will come out in a week.Reading this is just sad train 18 and when train 20 came out were both highly promising projects who could have changed the face of railways in this country.
But at this point I'm used to such disappointments.
Gorkhas do have significant history and traditions in support of their imagined or real qualities in claiming superiority in soldiering..I did not question their valour. As another poster pointed out this entire Martial race concept was brought by British. It is visible even today.
States with most no. Of infantry regiments:
Punjab: 3 (Sikh Regt., Sikh Light Infantry, Punjab Regt.)
J&K: 3 (J&K Light Infantry, J&K Rifles, Dogra Regt.)
NE people are no doubt warlike people. But I guess they don't have that superiority complex like we see with Gorkha Nepalis. They like to boast too much.
Haha if he takes out knife at his neck will be seen dangling from his body and his death will never ever be recognisedQuite intense.. Looks like the PLA guy sh*t himself..
We need to understand the Chinese strategy. Use funds provided by the Chinese state to undercut all domestic producers, keep at it till domestic producers fold up. The market then has no choice but to buy what is being sold by the Chinese, at a price they decide.I dont think we need Chinese technology for train engines. Chinese are undercutting everything on price. It is like my cheap washing machine - company refuses to provide warranty service.
Our tender system has deep flaws. We often buy items at an upfront low price but then pay massively for spares or just lack of aftersales service.
The government needs to stop participation of Chinese companies in our infra tenders. One cannot buy from an enemy country.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
India-China 2020 Border conflict | Indian Army | 29497 | ||
V | Non-Military implications of India-China Standoff 2020 | China | 61 | |
Memes & Jokes India China Standoff 2020 | Members Corner | 334 | ||
India to overtake China in 2020: Swaminathan Aiyar | Economy & Infrastructure | 33 |