- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 32,663
- Likes
- 151,106
Also there would no easy pullback this time because it would be DOKLAM 2.0It is actually the Central Military Commission which is the apex body with Xi Jinping as the Chairman. All of China's armed forces report to Chairman of the CMC. Even the Defense Minister is an errand boy whose primary job is to liaise with the militaries of other countries. He has no input on how and what the Chinese armed forces can or cannot do. Their MEA is a speck on the wall and if they do not want to be sent to re-education camps they do as they are told.
All of these talks with them are pointless because Xi Jinping has made up his mind and the rest of the military and diplomatic apparatus is only following his orders. The Chinese military commanders who show up at the negotiating table are nothing more than messenger boys and with the boss having already made up his mind, they cannot either offer or implement anything substantial to the Indian Army. That is why there has been no implementation of any substantial pull back.
which one will happen first?
Australia has a security treaty with USA.Australia shouldn't bank too much on powerful nations such as US and UK. They have their own issue and distance from china.
Weak nations in South china sea have no intention to go all out war.
as for India we are unreliable with no war attitude we always chikhen out from a tough roar from china. We go for diplomatic channels. Talk and desecration even if we have to loose a chunk of land.
Its better to keep their issue private and let china commite first mistake by attacking Asian nations.
Chinese are coming to table for talk only because they want to gear up their attack. When they will be totally ready they will do as they wish where as we will be too busy with sushant singh rajpoot and political doldrums.It is actually the Central Military Commission which is the apex body with Xi Jinping as the Chairman. All of China's armed forces report to Chairman of the CMC. Even the Defense Minister is an errand boy whose primary job is to liaise with the militaries of other countries. He has no input on how and what the Chinese armed forces can or cannot do. Their MEA is a speck on the wall and if they do not want to be sent to re-education camps they do as they are told.
All of these talks with them are pointless because Xi Jinping has made up his mind and the rest of the military and diplomatic apparatus is only following his orders. The Chinese military commanders who show up at the negotiating table are nothing more than messenger boys and with the boss having already made up his mind, they cannot either offer or implement anything substantial to the Indian Army. That is why there has been no implementation of any substantial pull back.
Remember paltu ram trump has a policy of America first. He doesn't want to loose anything . Unless he gains something out of it.Australia has a security treaty with USA.
Yup, could happen.Remember paltu ram trump has a policy of America first. He doesn't want to loose anything . Unless he gains something out of it.
Trump: Austalia cried so beautifully that it was probably the most beautiful back stab we ever did. I say we finish the china wall and let them yellow people rot there.
He( Lt Gen PC Katoch) spoke my mind... It's a monumental failure on the part of our intelligence agencies along with those who are at helm of enabling such agencies by equipping them with requisite tools & tackles.Can this really happen
China May be Drawing Up Plan to Hit India Around Winters as Floods, Pandemic Make 'Situation Ideal' - News18
In a closed door international seminar in a foreign country eight years back, some speakers opined China could use tactical nukes to force India submit vital territory. In the current scenario, it could even be tactical bio-bomb.www.news18.com
USA does not have enough troops in the Pacific theater to counter China. Without Quad, it does not work.Yup, could happen.
Then again, it’s also his administration policy to shift military assets from Europe to Pacific.
No , this time's Pant Shivering .#Dhotishivering start ho gae kya
Sir please correct me, afaik, the main problem of US EUA is, the buyer won't be able to use those in offensive action against other countries without US approval. there isn't any bar in using those in def.We are assuming things. What's the guarantee that American hardware will not fail. With Russians atleast we have the advantage of them being able to supply us spares and everything at short notice...Machines do fail .. they are bound to .... but who gives u best support when they fail is what matters...
Adn you think we did not tried this ... EUA is non negotiable....
I call it balancing act we did to keep them happy and show that we are serious but in equal partnership...and there is no begging ... it;s pure business.. they have something to sell and we have a need ...
and you need to stop thinking that they are doing us favor......
Do we have any incident with AUSSIES where they back stabbed us that we dont trust them.. I know in world of politics , u dont trust ur own blood but still...Australia has a security treaty with USA.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
India-China 2020 Border conflict | Indian Army | 29497 | ||
V | Non-Military implications of India-China Standoff 2020 | China | 61 | |
Memes & Jokes India China Standoff 2020 | Members Corner | 334 | ||
India to overtake China in 2020: Swaminathan Aiyar | Economy & Infrastructure | 33 |