India-China 2020 Border conflict

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lancer

Bana
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2019
Messages
1,447
Likes
5,876
Country flag
Don't know why Jaichand is touted as a traitor.. It's basically a leftist agenda to target him... To tarnish Rajputs I guess. Take a look at this
Yea, Jaichand being a traitor is likely a fallacy spread due to the Prithviraj Raso (which was filled with such inaccuracies and is basically a work of fantasy/Historical Fiction).

Same with the whole thing about Prithviraj forgiving Ghori 17 times. They fought only twice in total. And Prithviraj didn't shoot any arrow while blinded to kill him either. Even the whole Samyukta story is likely incorrect.
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
Mod
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,133
Likes
149,063
Country flag
Yeah, no. I don't buy that. CSG has been consistent in their view of biding your time, keeping your head down and not angering daddy China, even when the threat is literally on the border.
Without CSG recommendation there wouldn't have been a Infra buildup at LAC & Tibet border either, construction might have been delayed by previous govts but atleast now they have a govt which implements their recommendations.
CSG is not a military think tank, they are a national security think tank, they quite possibly take political and diplomatic inputs as well.

My point is very simple, everything can't be viewed only in military angle.
 

RoaringTigerHiddenDragon

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Messages
4,070
Likes
17,369
Country flag
There was a proposal to have a tunneled road below chicken neck, dont know what happened to that.
Most IA generals have been of the view that China could perhaps ingress into Assam or Arunachal but egress would be impossible.
To get to chicken neck corridor, the PLA has to occupy Bhutan first and then cross. However small, Bhutan has a standing Army. This will be an act of war and will be akin to the Nazis marching into former Czechoslovakia, triggering alliances for ww2.
 

shade

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Messages
15,211
Likes
90,736
Country flag
Can we read this Huawei/ZTE in another way ?

We are not going to have a policy document printed on the bulletin board in the IT ministry that says "XYZ is barred". We will just set up the spces in the RFP in such a way that the chees never win.
The Indian government will not publicly state that they will exclude Huawei,ZTE but I believe privately all the telco players have been told to avoid Chinese telcos. This will be somewhat similar to no IPL team bidding for Pakistan players. There is no rule against that but it does not happen nevertheless

Allowing Huawei is the equivalent of having a Chinese general in the room where our war plans are being made. Huawei's habit of inserting backdoors in router code is public knowledge.
Hope this is true, but with the amount of opportunistic babus and Chinese lobbyists in industry and government you can never be sure.

“India is the child of the British Empire that seeks to preserve the status quo. It no longer identifies with the Mughal Empire, Britain’s predecessor.”
Stopped reading right there.
It is correct though
The current Republic of India( i.e the State, not the Nation ) is a British Left liberal construct, with Institutions like IAS, etc carried over, laws carried over way of thought( the "secularism" they promote all the time ), politicians, Legal system etc all from the time of the British Raj.
It is the reason why up until the Modi era, all Indian institutions and educational policy promoted westernized "secularism", and the top echelons of power were filled with Westernized, deracinated and godless traitors, who only cared for self-interest, and never about national interest beyond their kickbacks and bribes, surrounded by Westernized Liberal academics, journalists etc, all who's sole purpose was to support this un-Indian construct with lies and slander


This is also why you find the Lutyen's establishment regularly crying about the "Idea of India"( by which they imply that India the nation is an artificial construct, created by congress types, without this "idea" there would be no united nation ) and also why the paranoia over Modi creating a Hindu Rashtra, which implicitly means a purge of all Macaulay-putras in the bureaucracy, courts etc.


Sorry for this OT wall of text mods :(
 

daya

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
782
Likes
1,826
Country flag
Don't know why Jaichand is touted as a traitor.. It's basically a leftist agenda to target him... To tarnish Rajputs I guess. Take a look at this
Mujhe ek bade prominent history aur sanskrit ke teacher ne bataya tha ki sanyogita ko ladki bana diya, videshiyon ne.. actually, ye jhagda do state ke beech no men's land ko lekar tha.. jisko sanyukta bola jaata tha.. videshi sanyukta ko sanyogita ek ladki banakar project kar diya... Unhone kaha ki hinduon men rishte ki bahan aur bhanji se shadi hoti hi nahi thi aur to aur isko apradh maana jata tha.. agar sanyogita ki kahani sach maani jaye tab bhi prithiviraj chauhan aur sanyogita ki shaadi hona asambhav tha...
 

neel9821

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
224
Likes
913
Country flag
“India is the child of the British Empire that seeks to preserve the status quo. It no longer identifies with the Mughal Empire, Britain’s predecessor.”
Stopped reading right there.
We do not necessarily need to agree with the author but, to some extend, the author is correct. We are trying to stick to what we got in 1947 from British. Ancient India was composed of the modern-day countries of Afghanistan (some portions), Bangladesh, Bhutan, Myanmar, India, Nepal and Pakistan. Are we even talking about it? With Chinese, our goal is to stick to the MacMohan line.
We are trying to restore the status quo with Chinese
 

Assassin 2.0

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2019
Messages
6,087
Likes
30,705
Country flag
The current Republic of India( i.e the State, not the Nation ) is a British Left liberal construct, with Institutions like IAS, etc carried over, laws carried over way of thought( the "secularism" they promote all the time ), politicians, Legal system etc all from the time of the British Raj.
It is the reason why up until the Modi era, all Indian institutions and educational policy promoted westernized "secularism", and the top echelons of power were filled with Westernized, deracinated and godless traitors, who only cared for self-interest, and never about national interest beyond their kickbacks and bribes, surrounded by Westernized Liberal academics, journalists etc, all who's sole purpose was to support this un-Indian construct with lies and slander
Whitewashing everything.
If india was child of British empire then we would have been having union jack as a flag and would be having photos of queen on the currency.
Most importantly india would have been a Christian majority country with interest which would have been in line with western / british interest but after 60s india and west relationship declined systematically.

Anyway india from time to time have shown that it does have capability to take it's own stand.
Anyway the credit of fuckin up with indian system goes to congress and and Muslim gandhi family to not to anyone else.

Most of the laws ideologies are not copyrighted by anyone. These are free far all values which are being followed by majority of republics but that doesn't mean that they are not sovereign.
The idea of india being a artificial state is so funny first of all this whole subcontinent is indian and india is connected through cultural lines which are hard to break even after decades of suffering.
 

cereal killer

Senior Member
Joined
May 14, 2020
Messages
2,128
Likes
8,394
Country flag
Mujhe ek bade prominent history aur sanskrit ke teacher ne bataya tha ki sanyogita ko ladki bana diya, videshiyon ne.. actually, ye jhagda do state ke beech no men's land ko lekar tha.. jisko sanyukta bola jaata tha.. videshi sanyukta ko sanyogita ek ladki banakar project kar diya... Unhone kaha ki hinduon men rishte ki bahan aur bhanji se shadi hoti hi nahi thi aur to aur isko apradh maana jata tha.. agar sanyogita ki kahani sach maani jaye tab bhi prithiviraj chauhan aur sanyogita ki shaadi hona asambhav tha...
Basically Prithviraj Raso is a work of fiction... Contemporary historians put Jaichandra in high regard. He was most powerful emperor of North India at the time. Local accounts record that he was last Hindu King to perform Rajsuya Yagya.
He had a definite rift with Prithviraj but so did every other emperor in India... Prithviraj's duels with famous Alha Udal bros had basically weakened him just before 2nd battle with Ghori.
Leftist & Marxist historians like to spread Prithviraj Raso by Chandbardai as some gospel truth.
In the battle of Chandwar Jaichandra was about to defeat Ghori but a stray arrow stuck him... And then he was Given Villian title wrongly.
True Indology also busted this myth sometime ago.
 

bajiraopeshwa

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2020
Messages
177
Likes
830
Country flag
Another interesting article. It is written by a person with some ties to China so take with some salt. Nevertheless some interesting takeaways


1. China had the edge in infra and India had the edge in manpower. Now India is closing the gap in infra but the Chinese cannot close the gap in manpower due to their one child policy

2. Many within China are of the opinion that China’s India policy at this juncture is lacking strength and its military deterrence against India is increasingly proving ineffective - quote from article

3. Ratio of troops at LAC favors India (at 4:1 or 5:1)

4. India with average age of 27 is a bigger threat to China than an aging USA is.

On the last point, I think that as India closes the economic and technology gap with China, it will become increasingly difficult and unviable for China to even hold on to Tibet, forget areas in Ladakh. This may ofcourse take 40-50 years but as long as we dont sign some idiotic agreement it is okay. China has every incentive to close the Tibet/Ladakh issue before India becomes strong and this is what India must avoid.

Xinjiang is the puzzle though. We would rather not have another Islamic neighbour on our borders hence have to think what a free Xinjiang would mean.
 

Shashank Nayak

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
5,153
Likes
17,261
Country flag

Micheal & George in Kunming (lol)

Several other traitors might be shitting bricks now, hopefully.
Would be great if Generalfeldmarschall Sawhnstein was connected with this in some way.. It would be nice to see the prick's ass hauled around
 

etantra

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2020
Messages
164
Likes
553
Country flag
Who seriously believes the Global Times anyway. The narrative set by India will be bought by the world.
well when you read articles in India that talk about 20 indians killed by PLA and doesn't even mention the possibility of PLA causualities, you know liberal Indians themselves have bought GT line.. mostly cause the RW was not given the tools to fight GT and liberals..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Replies

New threads

Articles

Top